Suppr超能文献

BRAF 突变转移性黑色素瘤患者不同预后类别中一线靶向治疗与免疫治疗的比较:一项意大利黑色素瘤协作组研究

Comparison Between First Line Target Therapy and Immunotherapy in Different Prognostic Categories of BRAF Mutant Metastatic Melanoma Patients: An Italian Melanoma Intergroup Study.

作者信息

Marconcini Riccardo, Fava Paolo, Nuzzo Amedeo, Manacorda Simona, Ferrari Marco, De Rosa Francesco, De Tursi Michele, Tanda Enrica Teresa, Consoli Francesca, Minisini Alessandro, Pimpinelli Nicola, Morgese Francesca, Bersanelli Melissa, Tucci Marco, Saponara Maristella, Parisi Alessandro, Ocelli Marcella, Bazzurri Serena, Massaro Giulia, Morganti Riccardo, Ciardetti Isabella, Stanganelli Ignazio

机构信息

Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.

Struttura Complessa (S.C.) Dermatologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 15;12:917999. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.917999. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

BRAF and MEK inhibitors target therapies (TT) and AntiPD1 immunotherapies (IT) are available first-line treatments for BRAF v600 mutant metastatic melanoma patients. ECOG PS (E), baseline LDH (L), and baseline number of metastatic sites (N) are well-known clinical prognostic markers that identify different prognostic categories of patients. Direct comparison between first-line TT and IT in different prognostic categories could help in first line treatment decision.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis conducted in 14 Italian centers on about 454 metastatic melanoma patients, divided in 3 groups: group A-patients with E = 0, L within normal range, and N less than 3; group B-patients not included in group A or C; group C-patients with E > 0, L over the normal range, and N more than 3. For each prognostic group, we compared TT and IT in terms of progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

In group A, results in 140 TT and 36 IT-treated patients were, respectively, median PFS 35.5 vs 11.6 months (HR (95% CI) 1.949 (1.180-3.217) value 0.009); median OS not reached vs 55 months (HR (95% CI) 1.195 (0.602-2.373) value 0.610); DCR 99% vs 75% value <0.001). In group B, results in 196 TT and 38 IT-treated patients were, respectively, median PFS 11.5 vs 5 months (HR 1.535 (1.036-2.275) value 0.033); median OS 19 vs 20 months (HR 0.886 (0.546-1.437) value 0.623); DCR 85% vs 47% value <0.001). In group C, results in 41 TT and 3 IT-treated patients were, respectively, median PFS 6.4 vs 1.8 months (HR 4.860 (1.399-16) value 0.013); median OS 9 vs 5 months (HR 3.443 (0.991-11.9) value 0.052); DCR 66% vs 33% value 0.612).

CONCLUSIONS

In good prognosis, group A-TT showed statistically significant better PFS than IT, also in a long-term period, suggesting that TT can be a good first line option for this patient category. It is only in group B that we observed a crossing of the survival curves after the 3rd year of observation in favor of IT. Few patients were enrolled in group C, so few conclusions can be made on it.

摘要

背景

BRAF和MEK抑制剂靶向治疗(TT)以及抗程序性死亡蛋白1(Anti-PD1)免疫治疗(IT)是BRAF V600突变转移性黑色素瘤患者的一线治疗方案。美国东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS,E)、基线乳酸脱氢酶(LDH,L)以及转移部位的基线数量(N)是公认的临床预后标志物,可用于识别不同预后类别的患者。对不同预后类别中一线TT和IT进行直接比较有助于做出一线治疗决策。

方法

这是一项在意大利14个中心对约454例转移性黑色素瘤患者进行的回顾性分析,患者分为3组:A组——ECOG PS = 0、LDH在正常范围内且转移部位数量小于3的患者;B组——不包括在A组或C组的患者;C组——ECOG PS > 0、LDH超过正常范围且转移部位数量大于3的患者。对于每个预后组,我们比较了TT和IT在无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和疾病控制率(DCR)方面的差异。

结果

在A组中,140例接受TT治疗的患者和36例接受IT治疗的患者,其PFS中位数分别为35.5个月和11.6个月(风险比(HR)(95%置信区间)为1.949(1.180 - 3.217),P值为0.009);OS中位数未达到和55个月(HR(95%置信区间)为1.195(0.602 - 2.373),P值为0.610);DCR分别为99%和75%(P值<0.001)。在B组中,196例接受TT治疗的患者和38例接受IT治疗的患者,其PFS中位数分别为11.5个月和5个月(HR为1.535(1.036 - 2.275),P值为0.033);OS中位数分别为19个月和20个月(HR为0.886(0.546 - 1.437),P值为0.623);DCR分别为85%和47%(P值<0.001)。在C组中,41例接受TT治疗的患者和3例接受IT治疗的患者,其PFS中位数分别为6.4个月和1.8个月(HR为4.860(1.399 - 16),P值为0.013);OS中位数分别为9个月和5个月(HR为3.443(0.991 - 11.9),P值为0.052);DCR分别为66%和33%(P值为0.612)。

结论

在预后良好的A组中,TT显示出在PFS方面比IT具有统计学意义上的显著优势,且在长期内也是如此,这表明TT可能是该类患者的良好一线选择。仅在B组中,我们观察到在观察第3年后生存曲线交叉,有利于IT。C组纳入的患者很少,因此对此组很难得出结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d2/9421680/42b15cd98b39/fonc-12-917999-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验