Suppr超能文献

BRAF 突变转移性黑色素瘤的靶向治疗或免疫治疗:西班牙一家中心的十年经验

Targeted therapy or immunotherapy in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a Spanish center's decade of experience.

作者信息

Sun Chen, España Sofia, Richarz Nina, Solé-Blanch Carme, Boada Aram, Martinez-Cardús Anna, Chu Alan, Liu Zongwen, Manzano Jose Luis

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Medical Oncology Department, Institut Catala d´Oncologia Badalona, Universitari Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona-Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 21;14:1322116. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1322116. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies and immunotherapy are currently considered the mainstay first-line treatment for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, the impact of treatment (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) and the prognostic factors are still not clear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of 140 patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to extract demographic, BRAF status, treatment, performance status, and survival data. ORR, PFS, and OS were compared between patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma and treated with first-line IT or BRAF/MEKi. The prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In all patients and those treated with immunotherapy, we did not find any effect of BRAF status on ORR, PFS, or OS. In patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, ORR was 43.8% vs. 70% (P=0.04), PFS was 19.2 vs. 11.5 months (p=0.22), and OS was 33.4 vs. 16.4 months for the immunotherapy and targeted therapy groups, respectively (P=0.04). ECOG, presence of brain metastases, and high LDH level from initiation of first-line treatment were all associated with differences in PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma treated with first-line immunotherapy had a significantly longer PFS and OS than those treated with first-line BRAF/MEKi; however, first-line BRAF/MEKi treatment had a significantly higher ORR than first-line immunotherapy.

摘要

背景

靶向治疗和免疫治疗目前被认为是晚期BRAF突变型黑色素瘤的主要一线治疗方法。然而,治疗(靶向治疗和免疫治疗)的影响以及预后因素仍不明确。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2011年至2021年间140例诊断为晚期黑色素瘤患者的病历,以提取人口统计学、BRAF状态、治疗、体能状态和生存数据。比较诊断为晚期黑色素瘤并接受一线免疫治疗或BRAF/MEKi治疗的患者的客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。使用Cox回归模型评估预后因素。

结果

在所有患者以及接受免疫治疗的患者中,我们未发现BRAF状态对ORR、PFS或OS有任何影响。在BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者中,免疫治疗组和靶向治疗组的ORR分别为43.8%和70%(P = 0.04),PFS分别为19.2个月和11.5个月(p = 0.22),OS分别为33.4个月和16.4个月(P = 0.04)。从一线治疗开始时的东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态、脑转移的存在以及高乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平均与PFS和OS的差异相关。

结论

一线接受免疫治疗的晚期BRAF突变型黑色素瘤患者的PFS和OS明显长于一线接受BRAF/MEKi治疗的患者;然而,一线BRAF/MEKi治疗的ORR明显高于一线免疫治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8829/10915752/71452bb71d69/fonc-14-1322116-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验