Romantseva Eugenia, Alperovich Nina, Ross David, Lund Steven P, Strychalski Elizabeth A
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.
Synth Biol (Oxf). 2022 Aug 13;7(1):ysac015. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysac015. eCollection 2022.
DNA templates for protein production remain an unexplored source of variability in the performance of cell-free expression (CFE) systems. To characterize this variability, we investigated the effects of two common DNA extraction methodologies, a postprocessing step and manual versus automated preparation on protein production using CFE. We assess the concentration of the DNA template, the quality of the DNA template in terms of physical damage and the quality of the DNA solution in terms of purity resulting from eight DNA preparation workflows. We measure the variance in protein titer and rate of protein production in CFE reactions associated with the biological replicate of the DNA template, the technical replicate DNA solution prepared with the same workflow and the measurement replicate of nominally identical CFE reactions. We offer practical guidance for preparing and characterizing DNA templates to achieve acceptable variability in CFE performance.
用于蛋白质生产的DNA模板仍是无细胞表达(CFE)系统性能中一个尚未探索的变异性来源。为了表征这种变异性,我们研究了两种常见DNA提取方法、一个后处理步骤以及手动与自动制备对使用CFE进行蛋白质生产的影响。我们评估了DNA模板的浓度、DNA模板在物理损伤方面的质量以及由八种DNA制备工作流程产生的DNA溶液在纯度方面的质量。我们测量了与DNA模板的生物学重复、使用相同工作流程制备的技术重复DNA溶液以及名义上相同的CFE反应的测量重复相关的CFE反应中蛋白质滴度的方差和蛋白质生产速率。我们为制备和表征DNA模板提供实用指导,以在CFE性能中实现可接受的变异性。