Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Dev Sci. 2023 May;26(3):e13318. doi: 10.1111/desc.13318. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
The development of independent sitting changes everyday opportunities for learning and has cascading effects on cognitive and language development. Prior to independent sitting, infants experience the sitting position with physical support from caregivers. Why does supported sitting not provide the same input for learning that is experienced in independent sitting? This question is especially relevant for infants with gross motor delay, who require support in sitting for many months after typically developing infants sit independently. We observed infants with typical development (n = 34, ages 4-7 months) and infants with gross motor delay (n = 128, ages 7-16 months) in early stages of sitting development, and their caregivers, in a dyadic play observation. We predicted that infants who required caregiver support for sitting would spend more time facing away from the caregiver and less time contacting objects than infants who could sit independently. We also predicted that caregivers of supported sitters would spend less time contacting objects because their hands would be full supporting their infants. Our first two hypotheses were confirmed; however, caregivers spent surprisingly little time using both hands to provide support, and caregivers of supported sitters spent more time contacting objects than caregivers of independent sitters. Similar patterns were seen in the group of typically developing infants and the infants with motor delay. Our findings suggest that independent sitting and supported sitting provide qualitatively distinct experiences with different implications for social interaction and learning opportunities. HIGHLIGHTS: During seated free play, supported sitters spent more time facing away from their caregivers and less time handling objects than independent sitters. Caregivers who spent more time supporting infants with both hands spent less time handling objects; however, caregivers mostly supported infants with one or no hands. A continuous measure of sitting skill did not uniquely contribute to these behaviors beyond the effect of binary sitting support (supported vs. independent sitter). The pattern of results was similar for typically developing infants and infants with gross motor delay, despite differences in age.
独坐的发展改变了日常学习的机会,并对认知和语言发展产生了级联效应。在独立坐之前,婴儿在照顾者的身体支撑下体验坐姿。为什么有支撑的坐姿不能为学习提供与独立坐姿相同的输入?对于那些在通常能独立坐的婴儿之后仍需要数月支撑才能坐的粗大运动发育迟缓的婴儿来说,这个问题尤为重要。我们观察了处于早期坐姿发展阶段的具有典型发育的婴儿(n = 34,年龄 4-7 个月)和具有粗大运动发育迟缓的婴儿(n = 128,年龄 7-16 个月)及其照顾者,进行了双人游戏观察。我们预测,需要照顾者支撑才能坐的婴儿会花更多的时间背对照顾者,而花更少的时间接触物体,而那些能够独立坐的婴儿则会花更多的时间接触物体。我们还预测,支撑坐的婴儿的照顾者会花更少的时间接触物体,因为他们的手会忙于支撑他们的婴儿。我们的前两个假设得到了证实;然而,照顾者用双手提供支撑的时间却少得惊人,而且支撑坐的婴儿的照顾者比独立坐的婴儿的照顾者花更多的时间接触物体。在典型发育的婴儿组和运动迟缓的婴儿组中都观察到了类似的模式。我们的研究结果表明,独立坐姿和支撑坐姿提供了截然不同的体验,对社会互动和学习机会有不同的影响。重点:在自由坐姿游戏中,支撑坐的婴儿比独立坐的婴儿花更多的时间背对照顾者,花更少的时间处理物体。那些用双手更多地支撑婴儿的照顾者花在处理物体上的时间更少;然而,照顾者大多只用一只手或不用手来支撑婴儿。坐姿技能的连续测量值并不能独立于坐姿支持(支撑与独立坐姿)的效果来解释这些行为。这些结果的模式对于典型发育的婴儿和粗大运动发育迟缓的婴儿来说是相似的,尽管年龄存在差异。