J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2022 Aug;70(4):695-728. doi: 10.1177/00030651221113776.
A wide-ranging survey focusing on the experiences of analysts providing telehealth treatment approximately six months into the pandemic was sent to one hundred randomly selected APsaA graduate analysts, one hundred randomly selected APsaA candidate analysts, and then to everyone on the APsaA members' Listserv. Presented both open-ended and closed-ended questions, analysts were invited to quantify and reflect on their experience. Responding analysts in each of the three groups described similar experiences. Each group noted that they have, overall, moved from a neutral to a modestly positive acceptance of telehealth as a means of delivering psychoanalysis. In describing the frame and process of telehealth, the analysts reported wide differences in patient response to the change in format, including positive, negative, and highly specific shifts in the treatment process attributable to the change in format. Telehealth, it appears, is a distinct space in which psychoanalysis can be conducted. In general, respondents minimized the impact of the pandemic itself on the analytic process, though the process may have been more impacted by the pandemic than they were reporting. All three groups almost unanimously reported interest in exploring innovative psychoanalytic techniques.
一项广泛的调查聚焦于分析师提供远程医疗治疗的经验,调查在大流行大约六个月后向一百名随机选择的 APsaA 研究生分析师、一百名随机选择的 APsaA 候选分析师,以及 APsaA 成员名单上的所有人发送。分析师被邀请提出开放式和封闭式问题,以量化和反思他们的经验。在这三个群体中,有回应的分析师描述了类似的经历。每个群体都指出,他们总体上从对远程医疗作为一种提供精神分析的手段的中立态度转变为适度的积极态度。在描述远程医疗的框架和过程时,分析师报告称,患者对格式变化的反应存在很大差异,包括由于格式变化而导致治疗过程中出现积极、消极和高度具体的转变。远程医疗似乎是一个可以进行精神分析的独特空间。总的来说,受访者将大流行本身对分析过程的影响降到最低,尽管这个过程可能比他们报告的受到大流行的影响更大。这三个群体几乎一致表示有兴趣探索创新的精神分析技术。