Chandra Johan, Krügel André, Engbert Ralf
Department of Psychology & Cognitive Science Program, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1230-1240. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01814-4.
During reading, rapid eye movements (saccades) shift the reader's line of sight from one word to another for high-acuity visual information processing. While experimental data and theoretical models show that readers aim at word centers, the eye-movement (oculomotor) accuracy is low compared to other tasks. As a consequence, distributions of saccadic landing positions indicate large (i) random errors and (ii) systematic over- and undershoot of word centers, which additionally depend on saccade lengths (McConkie et al. Visual Research, 28(10), 1107-1118, 1988). Here we show that both error components can be simultaneously reduced by reading texts from right to left in German language (N = 32). We used our experimental data to test a Bayesian model of saccade planning. First, experimental data are consistent with the model. Second, the model makes specific predictions of the effects of the precision of prior and (sensory) likelihood. Our results suggest that it is a more precise sensory likelihood that can explain the reduction of both random and systematic error components.
在阅读过程中,快速眼动(扫视)将读者的视线从一个单词转移到另一个单词,以便进行高敏锐度的视觉信息处理。虽然实验数据和理论模型表明读者的目标是单词中心,但与其他任务相比,眼动(动眼)精度较低。因此,扫视着陆位置的分布表明存在较大的(i)随机误差和(ii)单词中心的系统性超调与欠调,这还取决于扫视长度(麦康基等人,《视觉研究》,28(10),1107 - 1118,1988)。在这里我们表明,通过阅读德语从右到左的文本(N = 32),可以同时减少这两种误差成分。我们使用实验数据来测试一个扫视计划的贝叶斯模型。首先,实验数据与该模型一致。其次,该模型对先验精度和(感官)似然性的影响做出了具体预测。我们的结果表明,更精确的感官似然性可以解释随机和系统误差成分的减少。