Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service.
Department of Psychology.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(6):657-672. doi: 10.1037/ort0000642. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Research has demonstrated that ethnoracially minoritized college students face negative mental health outcomes associated with racism. However, little is known about the intersections between microaggressions and institution-specific racial discrimination, their relationship with psychological distress, and the role of coping in this relationship. An ethnoracially diverse sample of 915 young adults attending an urban minority-serving institution (MSI) completed self-report measures on sociodemographics, microaggressions and institution-specific racial discrimination, coping, anxiety and depression, and perceived stress. Latent class analysis (LCA) determined the number and nature of classes for both forms of racism. Hierarchical linear regressions assessed the association between the LCA classes and anxiety/depression and examined the moderating role of coping in said association. The LCA revealed two classes: "exoticization and environmental microaggressions" (EM), whose members reported experiencing these two types of microaggressions, and "institution-specific racial discrimination and microaggressions" (IRM), whose members reported both institution-specific racial discrimination and microaggressions in multiple domains. Belonging to the IRM group was associated with depression but not anxiety after adjusting for perceived stress. Black students and those reporting lower family income were more likely to belong to the IRM group. Coping moderated the relation between IRM group membership and depression, which was weaker for those who reported active coping in response to racism. College students from MSIs who experience both institution-specific racial discrimination and microaggressions may be at greater risk for depression than those who experience exoticization and environmental microaggressions alone. Active coping may ameliorate depression risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
研究表明,少数民族大学生面临与种族主义相关的负面心理健康后果。然而,人们对微侵犯和特定机构的种族歧视之间的交叉点、它们与心理困扰的关系以及应对在这种关系中的作用知之甚少。一个由 915 名在城市少数民族服务机构 (MSI) 就读的种族多样化的年轻人样本完成了社会人口统计学、微侵犯和特定机构的种族歧视、应对、焦虑和抑郁以及感知压力的自我报告测量。潜在类别分析 (LCA) 确定了这两种形式的种族主义的类别数量和性质。分层线性回归评估了 LCA 类别与焦虑/抑郁之间的关联,并检验了应对在这种关联中的调节作用。LCA 揭示了两个类别:“异国情调化和环境微侵犯”(EM),其成员报告经历了这两种类型的微侵犯,以及“特定机构的种族歧视和微侵犯”(IRM),其成员报告了多个领域的特定机构的种族歧视和微侵犯。在调整感知压力后,属于 IRM 组与抑郁有关,但与焦虑无关。黑人学生和报告家庭收入较低的学生更有可能属于 IRM 组。应对调节了 IRM 组成员与抑郁之间的关系,对于那些因种族主义而报告积极应对的人来说,这种关系较弱。来自 MSI 的大学生如果经历特定机构的种族歧视和微侵犯,可能比仅经历异国情调化和环境微侵犯的学生更容易患上抑郁症。积极应对可能会减轻抑郁风险。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。