• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the Development of Information Needs Assessment Questionnaires in Oncology: Protocol for a Scoping Review.审视肿瘤学中信息需求评估问卷的发展:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):e35639. doi: 10.2196/35639.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Impact of Telemedicine Use by Oncology Physicians on the Patient and Informal Caregiver Experience of Receiving Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review in the Context of COVID-19.肿瘤内科医生使用远程医疗对患者及非正式照护者就医体验的影响:COVID-19背景下的范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(12):e25501. doi: 10.2196/25501.
5
Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review.初级保健中成人健康筛查工具的社会决定因素:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 19;14:e68668. doi: 10.2196/68668.
6
Data Visualization Support for Tumor Boards and Clinical Oncology: Protocol for a Scoping Review.肿瘤病例讨论会和临床肿瘤学的数据可视化支持:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 5;13:e53627. doi: 10.2196/53627.
7
Natural Language Processing for Work-Related Stress Detection Among Health Professionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.自然语言处理在医疗卫生专业人员工作相关压力检测中的应用:方案设计型综述研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 15;13:e56267. doi: 10.2196/56267.
8
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.
9
Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review.老年人健康促进和疾病预防的数字技术:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 21;11(7):e37729. doi: 10.2196/37729.
10
Strategies for Alleviating the Burden Experienced by Informal Caregivers of Persons With Severe Mental Disorders in Transitional Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review.减轻转型国家严重精神障碍患者非正式照料者负担的策略:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 24;12:e44268. doi: 10.2196/44268.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the Cancer Journey Using Web-Based Information: Grounded Theory Emerging From the Lived Experience of Cancer Patients and Informal Caregivers With Implications for Web-Based Content Design.利用网络信息应对癌症历程:基于癌症患者及非正式护理者生活经历的扎根理论及其对网络内容设计的启示
JMIR Cancer. 2023 May 17;9:e41740. doi: 10.2196/41740.

本文引用的文献

1
Information Access and Use by Patients With Cancer and Their Friends and Family: Development of a Grounded Theory.癌症患者及其朋友和家人的信息获取和使用:扎根理论的发展。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e20510. doi: 10.2196/20510.
2
Patient-reported symptom burden and supportive care needs at cancer diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.患者报告的癌症诊断时的症状负担和支持性护理需求:一项回顾性队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):5889-5899. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05415-y. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
Patient-reported outcomes in Alberta: rationale, scope, and design of a database initiative.艾伯塔省患者报告结局:数据库计划的基本原理、范围和设计。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):e503-e509. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4919. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Assessment of patient information needs: A systematic review of measures.患者信息需求评估:测量方法的系统评价
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0209165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209165. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluation of psychometric properties of needs assessment tools in cancer patients: A systematic literature review.癌症患者需求评估工具的心理测量学特性评价:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0210242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210242. eCollection 2019.
6
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
7
Best Practices in Oncology Distress Management: Beyond the Screen.肿瘤应激管理的最佳实践:超越屏幕。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:813-821. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201307.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
A model of identity grounded in the acute season of survivorship.基于生存急性期的认同模式。
Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2412-2418. doi: 10.1002/pon.4842. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
10
Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trials.全球范围内随机对照试验已发表方案的数量及质量趋势。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173042. eCollection 2017.

审视肿瘤学中信息需求评估问卷的发展:一项范围综述方案

Examining the Development of Information Needs Assessment Questionnaires in Oncology: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

作者信息

Thiessen Maclean, Harris Daranne, Tang Patricia, Raffin Bouchal Shelley, Sinclair Shane

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):e35639. doi: 10.2196/35639.

DOI:10.2196/35639
PMID:36048517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9478820/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information needs are one of the most prevalent unmet supportive care needs of those living with cancer, including patients and their informal caregivers. Understanding how existing questionnaires for evaluating information needs have been developed is important for guiding appropriate use and informing future research. A literature review examining how information needs assessment questionnaires for use in the cancer context have been developed, with a specific focus on how questionnaire items have been identified, does not exist.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review will examine how questionnaires for assessing the information needs of those living with cancer have been developed with special focus on how patients, informal caregivers, and health care professionals have been involved in the selection and identification of questionnaire items.

METHODS

This review will include published studies describing the development and validation of information needs assessment questionnaires for use in the oncology context. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PsycInfo will be searched. Articles published at any point up to the date of the search will be eligible for inclusion. One person will screen titles and abstracts, and 2 people will screen and extract data from full-text articles.

RESULTS

Results are expected to be available in early 2023. Summary tables and a narrative summary will be used to describe results.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review will assist in identifying appropriate information needs assessment tools to incorporate into clinical and research contexts in oncology. It will also identify if additional information needs assessment tools are needed.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/35639.

摘要

背景

信息需求是癌症患者(包括患者及其非正式照护者)最普遍未得到满足的支持性护理需求之一。了解现有用于评估信息需求的问卷是如何制定的,对于指导合理使用和为未来研究提供信息非常重要。目前尚无文献综述探讨用于癌症背景下的信息需求评估问卷是如何制定的,尤其未关注问卷条目是如何确定的。

目的

本范围综述将探讨用于评估癌症患者信息需求的问卷是如何制定的,特别关注患者、非正式照护者和医疗保健专业人员如何参与问卷条目的选择和确定。

方法

本综述将纳入已发表的描述用于肿瘤学背景下的信息需求评估问卷的开发和验证的研究。将检索MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase(Ovid)、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane系统评价数据库和PsycInfo。截至检索日期之前任何时间发表的文章均符合纳入条件。一人将筛选标题和摘要,两人将从全文文章中筛选并提取数据。

结果

预计结果将于2023年初公布。将使用汇总表和叙述性总结来描述结果。

结论

本范围综述将有助于确定适合纳入肿瘤学临床和研究背景的信息需求评估工具。它还将确定是否需要额外的信息需求评估工具。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/35639。