• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索居民对邻里发展和振兴以促进积极生活机会的看法。

Exploring Residents' Perceptions of Neighborhood Development and Revitalization for Active Living Opportunities.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Nesbitt Hall, 3215 Market St NW, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Email:

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Sep 1;19:E56. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.220033.

DOI:10.5888/pcd19.220033
PMID:36048735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9480840/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community fears of gentrification have created concerns about building active living infrastructure in neighborhoods with low-income populations. However, little empirical research exists related to these concerns. This work describes characteristics of residents who reported 1) concerns about increased cost of living caused by neighborhood development and 2) support for infrastructural improvements even if the changes lead to a higher cost of living.

METHODS

Data on concerns about or support for transportation-related and land use-related improvements and sociodemographic characteristics were obtained from the 2018 SummerStyles survey, an online panel survey conducted on a nationwide sample of US adults (n = 3,782). Descriptive statistics characterized the sample, and χ tests examined associations among variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 19.1% of study respondents agreed that development had caused concerns about higher cost of living. Approximately half (50.7%) supported neighborhood changes for active living opportunities even if they lead to higher costs of living. Prevalences of both concern and support were higher among respondents who were younger and who had higher levels of education than their counterparts. Support did not differ between racial or ethnic groups, but concern was reported more often by Hispanic/Latino (28.9%) and other non-Hispanic (including multiracial) respondents (25.5%) than by non-Hispanic White respondents (15.6%). Respondents who reported concerns were more likely to express support (65.3%) than respondents who did not report concerns (47.3%).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that that low-income, racial, or ethnic minority populations support environmental changes to improve active living despite cost of living concerns associated with community revitalization.

摘要

简介

社区对高档化的担忧引发了人们对低收入人群社区建设活跃生活基础设施的关注。然而,关于这些担忧的实证研究很少。这项工作描述了报告以下两种情况的居民的特征:1)对社区发展导致生活成本增加的担忧,2)即使这些变化导致生活成本上升,仍支持基础设施改善。

方法

2018 年夏季风尚调查(一项针对美国成年人的全国性在线小组调查)收集了与交通和土地使用相关改善措施的担忧或支持以及社会人口统计学特征的数据。描述性统计方法对样本进行了描述,χ 检验分析了变量之间的关联。

结果

总体而言,19.1%的研究受访者认为发展导致了对生活成本上升的担忧。大约一半(50.7%)的人支持改善邻里环境以提供更多的活跃生活机会,即使这会导致更高的生活成本。与同龄人相比,年轻和受教育程度较高的受访者对这两种情况的担忧和支持的比例更高。不同种族或族裔群体之间的支持率没有差异,但西班牙裔/拉丁裔(28.9%)和其他非西班牙裔(包括多种族)受访者(25.5%)比非西班牙裔白人受访者(15.6%)报告的担忧更为常见。表示担忧的受访者比未报告担忧的受访者更有可能表示支持(65.3%比 47.3%)。

结论

研究表明,尽管与社区振兴相关的生活成本担忧,但低收入、少数族裔或少数民族群体支持通过环境变化来改善活跃生活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4051/9480840/d2e12ac2a29f/PCD-19-E56s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4051/9480840/d2e12ac2a29f/PCD-19-E56s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4051/9480840/d2e12ac2a29f/PCD-19-E56s01.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Residents' Perceptions of Neighborhood Development and Revitalization for Active Living Opportunities.探索居民对邻里发展和振兴以促进积极生活机会的看法。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Sep 1;19:E56. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.220033.
2
Examining the Relationship Between Racial, Ethnic, and Economic Residential Segregation and Cigarette Smoking Among a Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults.在全国代表性的年轻成年人样本中,研究种族、族裔和经济居住隔离与吸烟之间的关系。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):1016-1024. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae277.
3
Racial and Ethnic Digital Divides in Posting COVID-19 Content on Social Media Among US Adults: Secondary Survey Analysis.美国成年人在社交媒体上发布新冠疫情相关内容时的种族和族裔数字鸿沟:二次调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 3;22(7):e20472. doi: 10.2196/20472.
4
Impact of gentrification on adult mental health.中产阶级化对成年人心理健康的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):432-444. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13264. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Neighborhoods with Greater Prevalence of Minority Residents Have Lower Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence.少数民族居民比例较高的社区,持续气道正压通气治疗依从性较低。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;204(3):339-346. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3685OC.
6
The role of neighborhood characteristics in racial/ethnic disparities in type 2 diabetes: results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey.社区特征在2型糖尿病种族/民族差异中的作用:来自波士顿地区社区健康(BACH)调查的结果
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
Racial/ethnic neighborhood concentration and self-reported health in New York City.纽约市的种族/族裔社区集中度与自我报告的健康状况
Ethn Dis. 2006 Autumn;16(4):900-8.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Usage and Death by Neighborhood Poverty Among Individuals With Congenital Heart Defects, 4 US Surveillance Sites, 2011 to 2013.先天性心脏病患者的医疗使用和因邻里贫困导致的死亡的种族和民族差异,美国 4 个监测点,2011 年至 2013 年。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e033937. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033937. Epub 2024 May 23.
9
Do health trajectories predict neighborhood outcomes? Evidence of health selection in a diverse sample of U.S. adults.健康轨迹是否能预测社区结果?美国成年人多样化样本中的健康选择证据。
Health Place. 2022 Jan;73:102713. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102713. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
10
Hispanic Ethnic Density May Be Protective for Older Black/African American and Non-Hispanic White Populations for Some Health Conditions: An Exploration of Support and Neighborhood Mechanisms.西班牙裔聚居密度可能对某些健康状况下的老年黑人和非西班牙裔白人具有保护作用:对支持和邻里机制的探索。
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):21-34. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab014.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in the association of physical activity patterns with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a prospective cohort study from NHANES 2007-2018.身体活动模式与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率关联中的性别差异:一项基于2007 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查的前瞻性队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06056-z.
2
"Creating communities that care:" reflections from community leaders on Livability Academy, a neighborhood quality-of-life training program in Philadelphia.“创建关怀社区”:社区领袖对宜居学院的反思,这是费城一项邻里生活质量培训项目。
Cities Health. 2023;7(6):964-972. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2023.2228962. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2020 更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告》。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Understanding the Demographic Differences in Neighborhood Walking Supports.了解邻里步行支持方面的人口统计学差异。
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Apr;14(4):253-264. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0273. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Promoting physical activity interventions in communities with poor health and socio-economic profiles: A process evaluation of the implementation of a new walking group scheme.
Perspectives From Public Health Practitioners and Advocates on Community Development for Active Living: What are the Lasting Impacts?
公共卫生从业者和倡导者对积极生活社区发展的观点:有哪些持久影响?
Am J Health Promot. 2024 Jan;38(1):80-89. doi: 10.1177/08901171231198403. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Physical Activity-Friendly Policies and Community Design Features in the US, 2014 and 2021.2014 年和 2021 年美国的促进身体活动的政策和社区设计特点
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Aug 17;20:E72. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220397.
5
Development of an instrument to measure perceived gentrification for health research: Perceptions about changes in environments and residents (PACER).开发一种用于健康研究的测量感知到的绅士化程度的工具:对环境和居民变化的认知(PACER)。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Aug 23;15:100900. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100900. eCollection 2021 Sep.
在健康状况和社会经济状况较差的社区推广体育活动干预措施:一项新步行小组计划实施情况的过程评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;169:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.035. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
4
A simplified framework for incorporating health into community development initiatives.将健康纳入社区发展倡议的简化框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):1939-47. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0632.
5
Support for physical activity policies and perceptions of work and neighborhood environments: variance by BMI and activity status at the county and individual levels.对体育活动政策的支持以及对工作和邻里环境的认知:按县和个人层面的体重指数和活动状况的差异
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3 Suppl):S33-43. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130430-QUAN-216.
6
Active living collaboratives in the United States: understanding characteristics, activities, and achievement of environmental and policy change.美国的积极生活合作组织:了解环境和政策变化的特征、活动和成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E19. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120162.
7
Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes.感知邻里建成环境和社会环境属性的收入差距。
Health Place. 2011 Nov;17(6):1274-83. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
8
A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning.一项有关与体力活动和肥胖风险相关的建筑环境因素的系统评价:对智能增长城市规划的启示。
Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e173-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
9
Validation of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) items using geographic information systems.利用地理信息系统验证邻里环境步行性量表(NEWS)项目。
J Phys Act Health. 2009;6 Suppl 1:S113-23. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.s1.s113.
10
The Active Living by Design national program: community initiatives and lessons learned.《主动生活设计国家计划:社区举措和经验教训》
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6 Suppl 2):S313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.027.