Waitematā Endoscopy, Henderson, Auckland; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2022 Sep 2;135(1561):22-30. doi: 10.26635/6965.5807.
Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) has gained attention as a tool to assist with polyp detection during colonoscopy. Uncertainty remains as to the clinical benefit, given limited publications using different modules.
A single-centre retrospective study was performed at Waitematā Endoscopy, a private endoscopy centre in Auckland, New Zealand. An Olympus Endo-AID module was utilised for the first time by 13 experienced endoscopists. Outcomes from AIAC between 10 March 2021 to 23 April 2021 were compared to a subsequent non-AI conventional colonoscopy (CC) control group from 27/4/21 to 20/6/21.
A total of 213 AIACs were compared with 213 CCs. Baseline patient age, gender, indication for procedure, bowel preparation scores and specialty of proceduralist (gastroenterologist or surgeon) were well matched (p>0.05). The withdrawal time was significantly longer in the AIAC group compared to CC controls (15 vs 13 minutes; p<0.001). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was significantly higher in the AIAC group compared to CC group (47.9% vs 38.5%; odds ratio 1.59; 95% CI [1.05-2.41]; p=0.03). The overall polyp detection rate (PDR) was similar between groups (70% vs 70%; p=0.79). Analysis by polyp size, location and other histology was not significant between groups.
AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR compared with conventional colonoscopy. Further research is required to understand its utility and impact on long-term clinical outcomes.
人工智能辅助结肠镜检查(AIAC)作为一种在结肠镜检查中辅助息肉检测的工具受到了关注。由于使用不同模块的出版物有限,其临床获益仍存在不确定性。
这是一项在新西兰奥克兰私人内镜中心 Waitematā 内镜进行的单中心回顾性研究。13 名经验丰富的内镜医生首次使用奥林巴斯 Endo-AID 模块。比较了 2021 年 3 月 10 日至 2021 年 4 月 23 日首次使用 AIAC 的结果,以及 2021 年 4 月 27 日至 6 月 20 日随后进行的非 AI 常规结肠镜检查(CC)对照组的结果。
共比较了 213 例 AIAC 与 213 例 CC。患者年龄、性别、手术指征、肠道准备评分和操作医生的专业(胃肠病学家或外科医生)等基线特征均匹配良好(p>0.05)。AIAC 组的退镜时间明显长于 CC 对照组(15 分钟比 13 分钟;p<0.001)。AIAC 组的腺瘤检出率(ADR)明显高于 CC 组(47.9%比 38.5%;比值比 1.59;95%CI[1.05-2.41];p=0.03)。两组的总体息肉检出率(PDR)相似(70%比 70%;p=0.79)。组间对息肉大小、位置和其他组织学的分析无显著差异。
与常规结肠镜检查相比,AI 辅助结肠镜检查显著提高了 ADR。需要进一步研究以了解其效用及其对长期临床结果的影响。