Suppr超能文献

实时人工智能(AI)辅助内镜性能的一年回顾。

One-year review of real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy performance.

机构信息

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308232, Singapore.

Colorectal Service, Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, SingHealth, 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore, 544886, Singapore.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6402-6407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09979-8. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopies have long been the gold standard for detection of pre-malignant neoplastic lesions of the colon. Our previous study tried real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided colonoscopy over a three-month period and found significant improvements in collective and individual endoscopist's adenoma detection rates compared to baseline. As an expansion, this study evaluates the 1-year performance of AI-aided colonoscopy in the same institution.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a single institution in Singapore. The AI software used was GI Genius™ Intelligent Endoscopy Module, US-DG-2000309 © 2021 Medtronic. Between July 2021 and June 2022, polypectomy rates in non-AI-aided colonoscopies and AI-aided colonoscopies were calculated and compared. Some of the AI-aided colonoscopies were recorded and video reviewed. A "hit" was defined as a sustained detection of an area by the AI. If a polypectomy was performed for a "hit," its histology was reviewed. Additional calculations for polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and adenoma detection per colonoscopy (ADPC) were performed. Cost analysis was performed to determine cost effectiveness of subscription to the AI program.

RESULTS

2433 AI-aided colonoscopies were performed between July 2021 and June 2022 and compared against 1770 non-AI-aided colonoscopies. AI-aided colonoscopies yielded significantly higher rates of polypectomies (33.6%) as compared with non-AI-aided colonoscopies (28.4%) (p < 0.001). Among the AI-aided colonoscopies, 1050 were reviewed and a final 843 were included for additional analysis. The polypectomy to "hit" ratio was 57.4%, PDR = 45.6%, ADR = 32.4%, and ADPC = 2.08. Histological review showed that 25 polyps (3.13%) were sessile-serrated adenomas. Cost analysis found that the increased polypectomy rates in AI-aided colonoscopes led to an increase in revenue, which covered the subscription cost with an excess of USD 20,000.

CONCLUSION

AI-aided colonoscopy is a cost effective means of improving colonoscopy quality and may help advance colorectal cancer screening in Singapore.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查长期以来一直是检测结肠前恶性肿瘤病变的金标准。我们之前的研究在三个月的时间内尝试了实时人工智能(AI)辅助结肠镜检查,发现与基线相比,集体和个体内镜医师的腺瘤检测率均有显著提高。在此基础上,本研究评估了同一机构中 AI 辅助结肠镜检查的 1 年表现。

方法

在新加坡的一家单中心进行前瞻性队列研究。使用的 AI 软件是 GI Genius™ Intelligent Endoscopy Module,US-DG-2000309©2021 Medtronic。2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月,计算并比较了非 AI 辅助结肠镜检查和 AI 辅助结肠镜检查中的息肉切除术率。记录并视频审查了部分 AI 辅助结肠镜检查。“命中”定义为 AI 持续检测到一个区域。如果对“命中”进行了息肉切除术,则对其组织学进行了回顾。进行了息肉检测率(PDR)、腺瘤检测率(ADR)和每结肠镜检查的腺瘤检测数(ADPC)的额外计算。进行了成本分析,以确定 AI 程序订阅的成本效益。

结果

2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月期间共进行了 2433 次 AI 辅助结肠镜检查,并与 1770 次非 AI 辅助结肠镜检查进行了比较。AI 辅助结肠镜检查的息肉切除术率(33.6%)明显高于非 AI 辅助结肠镜检查(28.4%)(p<0.001)。在 AI 辅助结肠镜检查中,对 1050 次进行了审查,最终纳入 843 次进行了额外分析。息肉切除术与“命中”的比例为 57.4%,PDR=45.6%,ADR=32.4%,ADPC=2.08。组织学检查显示,25 个息肉(3.13%)为无蒂锯齿状腺瘤。成本分析发现,AI 辅助结肠镜检查中息肉切除术率的增加带来了收入的增加,超过 20,000 美元的订阅费用。

结论

AI 辅助结肠镜检查是提高结肠镜检查质量的一种具有成本效益的手段,可能有助于推进新加坡的结直肠癌筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验