• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作丧失后可控制感评价和应对策略对适应功能的中介作用:一个路径模型。

The mediating role of controllability appraisals and coping strategies on adaptive functioning after job loss: a path model.

机构信息

Department of Personality, Evaluation and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Somosaguas Campus, 28223, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;12(1):14898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19186-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-19186-5
PMID:36050384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9436725/
Abstract

Job loss is a stressful event that increases the risk of experiencing depression and anxiety, especially during the initial months of unemployment. This study examined differences in psychological symptoms and resilient functioning accounted by employment status. The results pointed out that recently unemployed compared to currently employed individuals had lower levels of perceived controllability and resilience as well as higher levels of depression and anxiety. Path analyses showed that lower controllability appraisals at wave 1 of recently unemployed compared to employed individuals, in turn, predicted a lower use of active coping and reappraisal at wave 2, with the latter further accounting for lower levels in resilience. Higher use of distraction further mediated the relation between employment status and higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. Our findings demonstrate the importance of controllability appraisals and coping strategies used to promote adaptive psychological functioning following job loss.

摘要

失业是一件充满压力的事情,会增加人们抑郁和焦虑的风险,尤其是在失业的最初几个月。本研究考察了就业状况导致的心理症状和适应功能的差异。结果表明,与目前在职的人相比,最近失业的人感知到的可控性和适应力较低,抑郁和焦虑程度较高。路径分析表明,与在职者相比,最近失业者在第 1 波的可控性评估较低,这反过来又预示着第 2 波的主动应对和再评估的使用较低,而后者进一步说明适应力较低。分心的使用进一步调节了就业状况与较高水平的抑郁和焦虑症状之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,在失业后,对可控性的评估和应对策略的使用对于促进适应性的心理功能非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/2c77e086edbe/41598_2022_19186_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/9f7f3d0d268f/41598_2022_19186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/01230635fffa/41598_2022_19186_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/cf822480b412/41598_2022_19186_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/2c77e086edbe/41598_2022_19186_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/9f7f3d0d268f/41598_2022_19186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/01230635fffa/41598_2022_19186_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/cf822480b412/41598_2022_19186_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a823/9437029/2c77e086edbe/41598_2022_19186_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The mediating role of controllability appraisals and coping strategies on adaptive functioning after job loss: a path model.工作丧失后可控制感评价和应对策略对适应功能的中介作用:一个路径模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;12(1):14898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19186-5.
2
Psychological Coping with Job Loss. Empirical Study to Contribute to the Development of Unemployed People.失业人群的心理应对策略。一项有助于失业人群发展的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 20;15(8):1787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081787.
3
Coping with employment uncertainty: a comparison of employed and unemployed workers.应对就业不确定性:在职与失业工人的比较
J Occup Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;10(3):200-9. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.3.200.
4
Unemployment, distress, and coping: a panel study of autoworkers.失业、困扰与应对:汽车工人的一项面板研究
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Aug;65(2):234-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.234.
5
A Sequential Path Model Testing: Emotional Intelligence, Resilient Coping and Self-Esteem as Predictors of Depressive Symptoms during Unemployment.序列路径模型测试:情绪智力、弹性应对和自尊作为失业期间抑郁症状的预测指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 15;18(2):697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020697.
6
Clarifying stress-internalizing associations: Stress frequency and appraisals of severity and controllability are differentially related to depression-specific, anxiety-specific, and transdiagnostic internalizing factors.厘清压力内化关联:压力频率以及对严重程度和可控性的评估与特定于抑郁、特定于焦虑和跨诊断内化因素均存在不同程度的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:638-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.053. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Resilience, self-efficacy, coping styles and depressive and anxiety symptoms in those newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.新诊断多发性硬化症患者的心理韧性、自我效能感、应对方式以及抑郁和焦虑症状
Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(6):635-45. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.999810. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
8
Unemployment, coping and psychological distress.失业、应对方式与心理困扰。
Scand J Psychol. 1997 Jun;38(2):151-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00021.
9
A 21-year longitudinal analysis of impact, coping, and appraisals following spinal cord injury.一项对脊髓损伤后影响、应对方式及评估的21年纵向分析。
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Feb;61(1):92-101. doi: 10.1037/rep0000066. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
10
Unemployment, perceived health status and coping: A study in Southern Italy.失业、感知健康状况与应对方式:一项意大利南部的研究。
Work. 2015;53(1):219-24. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152246.

本文引用的文献

1
Unemployment associated with major depression disorder and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.失业与重度抑郁症和抑郁症状相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2080-2092. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1954793. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
Influence of Unemployment on Mental Health of the Working Age Population.失业对劳动年龄人口心理健康的影响。
Mater Sociomed. 2017 Jun;29(2):92-96. doi: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.92-96.
3
The Wisdom to Know the Difference.明辨之智。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Dec;27(12):1651-1659. doi: 10.1177/0956797616669086. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
4
Mental health outcomes in times of economic recession: a systematic literature review.经济衰退时期的心理健康结果:一项系统的文献综述。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 3;16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2720-y.
5
Reappraisal and resilience to stress: Context must be considered.重新评估和抗压复原力:必须考虑背景因素。
Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e123. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400171X.
6
Coping with Job Loss and Reemployment: A Two-Wave Study.应对失业与再就业:一项两阶段研究。
J Bus Psychol. 2015;30(3):529-541. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9380-7.
7
Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation.监管弹性:应对和情绪调节的个体差异视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):591-612. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116.
8
Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: a meta-analytic review.应对灵活性和心理调整应对压力生活变化:元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1582-607. doi: 10.1037/a0037913. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
9
A person-by-situation approach to emotion regulation: cognitive reappraisal can either help or hurt, depending on the context.一种基于人与情境的情绪调节方法:认知重评取决于情境,既可能有帮助,也可能有伤害。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2505-14. doi: 10.1177/0956797613496434. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
10
Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: the Pemberton Happiness Index.构建并验证七种语言的综合幸福感衡量标准:彭伯顿幸福感指数。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Apr 22;11:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-66.