• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绩效付费的医疗服务模式能否改善疫苗接种率方面的总体及城乡不平等状况?来自冈比亚的一项双重差分分析。

Does a pay-for-performance health service model improve overall and rural-urban inequity in vaccination rates? A difference-in-differences analysis from the Gambia.

作者信息

Sowe Alieu, Namatovu Fredinah, Cham Bai, Gustafsson Per E

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Expanded Program on Immunization, Ministry of Health, Banjul, Gambia.

出版信息

Vaccine X. 2022 Aug 17;12:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100206. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100206
PMID:36051748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9424534/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the implementation of a results-based financing (RBF) project in The Gambia resulted in (1) improved national vaccination coverage (2) higher coverage in intervention than non-intervention areas, and (3) improvement in rural-urban coverage inequality.

METHODS

The study used a difference-in-differences design, based on repeated cross-sectional data from The Gambian Demographic and Health Surveys 2013 (N = 1650) and 2020 (N = 1456). Full vaccination (receipt of one BCG, 3 OPV, 3 DTP, and 1 measles-containing vaccine doses) and rural-urban vaccination inequality were our outcome variables. The intervention, RBF, was implemented in 5 of the 7 health regions. Covariates controlled for included child's sex, child's birth order number, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, distance from health facility, maternal education, mother's age group, mother's marital status, and mother's work status. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to estimate whether coverage changed, and difference-in-differences and difference-in-differences-in-differences were used to 'assess differences in vaccination coverage change and change in inequalities, respectively.

RESULTS

Total crude full vaccination coverage in The Gambia was 76% in 2013 and 84.6% in 2020. Overall vaccination significantly increased by 16% (95% CI: 9% to 24%) in 2020 compared to 2013, but with a smaller increase in intervention relative to non-intervention areas [PRR 0.88 (CI: 0.78-0.99)]. Rural-urban inequality in vaccination coverage decreased more - by 13% [0.87 (0.78-0.98)] - in RBF than non-RBF regions.

CONCLUSION

Vaccination coverage improved over the study period though we have no evidence to ascribe the coverage gains to the RBF intervention. However, our study suggests that the RBF project has contributed to reducing rural-urban inequalities in the regions it was implemented.

摘要

目的

评估在冈比亚实施基于结果的融资(RBF)项目是否带来了以下结果:(1)提高了全国疫苗接种覆盖率;(2)干预地区的覆盖率高于非干预地区;(3)改善了城乡覆盖率不平等的状况。

方法

本研究采用双重差分设计,基于冈比亚2013年(N = 1650)和2020年(N = 1456)人口与健康调查的重复横断面数据。全程疫苗接种(接种一剂卡介苗、3剂口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗、3剂百白破疫苗和1剂含麻疹成分疫苗)以及城乡疫苗接种不平等是我们的结果变量。RBF干预在7个卫生区域中的5个实施。控制的协变量包括儿童性别、儿童出生顺序、社会经济地位、种族、距医疗机构的距离、母亲教育程度、母亲年龄组、母亲婚姻状况和母亲工作状况。使用具有稳健方差的泊松回归来估计覆盖率是否发生变化,分别使用双重差分和三重差分来评估疫苗接种覆盖率变化的差异和不平等的变化。

结果

冈比亚的总粗全程疫苗接种覆盖率在2013年为76%,在2020年为84.6%。与2013年相比,2020年总体疫苗接种率显著提高了16%(95%置信区间:9%至24%),但干预地区相对于非干预地区的增幅较小[PRR 0.88(置信区间:0.78 - 0.99)]。RBF地区的疫苗接种覆盖率城乡不平等下降幅度更大——下降了13%[0.87(0.78 - 0.98)],高于非RBF地区。

结论

在研究期间疫苗接种覆盖率有所提高,尽管我们没有证据将覆盖率的提高归因于RBF干预。然而,我们的研究表明,RBF项目有助于减少其实施地区的城乡不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f3/9424534/ff15f76287e6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f3/9424534/ff15f76287e6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f3/9424534/ff15f76287e6/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Does a pay-for-performance health service model improve overall and rural-urban inequity in vaccination rates? A difference-in-differences analysis from the Gambia.绩效付费的医疗服务模式能否改善疫苗接种率方面的总体及城乡不平等状况?来自冈比亚的一项双重差分分析。
Vaccine X. 2022 Aug 17;12:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100206. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Child vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: Increasing coverage addresses inequalities.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的儿童疫苗接种:提高覆盖率可解决不平等问题。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 3;40(1):141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
3
Disentangling the rural-urban immunization coverage disparity in The Gambia: A Fairlie decomposition.解析冈比亚城乡免疫覆盖率差距:公平分解法。
Vaccine. 2019 May 21;37(23):3088-3096. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.062. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Missed opportunities for vaccination at point of care and their impact on coverage and urban-rural coverage inequity in the Gambia.冈比亚医疗机构现场接种疫苗的机会错失情况及其对疫苗接种覆盖率和城乡覆盖率不平等的影响。
Vaccine. 2023 Dec 18;41(52):7647-7654. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.041. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Decomposition of socioeconomic inequalities in child vaccination in Ethiopia: results from the 2011 and 2016 demographic and health surveys.埃塞俄比亚儿童疫苗接种中社会经济不平等的分解:来自 2011 年和 2016 年人口与健康调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e039617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039617.
6
Socio-demographic determinants of timely adherence to BCG, Penta3, measles, and complete vaccination schedule in Burkina Faso.社会人口因素对布基纳法索及时接种卡介苗、五联疫苗、麻疹和完全疫苗接种计划的影响。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 17;32(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.063. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
7
Starting then stopping: a nationwide register-based study on the magnitude, predictors, and urban-rural patterns of under-vaccination variation across health centers in The Gambia.起始而又停止:一项全国性基于登记的研究,旨在探讨冈比亚各卫生中心间疫苗接种不足的程度、预测因素和城乡分布模式。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2348788. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2348788. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
8
Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in child vaccination in the Gambia, the Kyrgyz Republic and Namibia.剖析冈比亚、吉尔吉斯斯坦和纳米比亚儿童疫苗接种中的社会经济不平等现象。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 16;37(44):6609-6616. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.054. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
Socioeconomic inequality trends in childhood vaccination coverage in India: Findings from multiple rounds of National Family Health Survey.印度儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的社会经济不平等趋势:来自多轮国家家庭健康调查的发现。
Vaccine. 2020 May 22;38(25):4088-4103. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Use of mobile phones for improving vaccination coverage among children living in rural hard-to-reach areas and urban streets of Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村偏远地区和城市街道,使用手机提高儿童疫苗接种覆盖率。
Vaccine. 2016 Jan 4;34(2):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.024. Epub 2015 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of Development Scores to Analyze Inequalities in Childhood Immunization Coverage: A Global Analysis from 2000 to 2021.构建发展分数以分析儿童免疫接种覆盖率的不平等现象:2000年至2021年的全球分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 16;22(6):941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060941.
2
Cost of COVID-19 vaccine delivery in nine States in Nigeria via the U.S. Government Initiative for Global Vaccine Access.尼日利亚九个州通过美国全球疫苗获取倡议提供 COVID-19 疫苗的成本。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11645-1.
3
Inequality in Childhood Immunization Coverage: A Scoping Review of Data Sources, Analyses, and Reporting Methods.

本文引用的文献

1
2021: the beginning of a new era of immunisations?2021年:免疫接种新时代的开端?
Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1519. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00900-4.
2
A realist review to assess for whom, under what conditions and how pay for performance programmes work in low- and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家,针对哪些人、在什么条件下以及如何实施按绩效付费计划的现实主义评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113624. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113624. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
3
Bolsa Família program and incomplete childhood vaccination in two Brazilian cohorts.
儿童免疫接种覆盖率的不平等:数据来源、分析及报告方法的范围综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;12(8):850. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080850.
4
An Analysis of the Social Impacts of a Health System Strengthening Program Based on Purchasing Health Services.基于购买卫生服务的卫生系统强化项目的社会影响分析。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Dec;13(4):751-773. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00147-8. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
5
Can payment by results ensure equitable access to contraceptive services? a qualitative case study.按效果付费能否确保公平获得避孕服务?一项定性案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 28;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01919-1.
巴西两个队列中的“家庭福利计划”和儿童疫苗接种不完全。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Oct 23;54:98. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001774. eCollection 2020.
4
Can Combining Performance-Based Financing With Equity Measures Result in Greater Equity in Utilization of Maternal Care Services? Evidence From Burkina Faso.绩效融资与公平措施相结合能否提高孕产妇保健服务的公平性?来自布基纳法索的证据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):308-322. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.121.
5
The effect of performance-based financing on child vaccinations in northern Nigeria.绩效型融资对尼日利亚北部儿童疫苗接种的影响。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 24;38(9):2209-2215. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.033. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Putting Institutions at the Center of Primary Health Care Reforms: Experience from Implementation in Three States in Nigeria.将机构置于初级卫生保健改革的中心:尼日利亚三个州的实施经验。
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Oct 1;2(4):290-301. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1234863.
7
The Effect of Pay-for-Performance Compensation Model Implementation on Vaccination Rate: A Systematic Review.绩效薪酬模式实施对疫苗接种率的影响:一项系统评价
Qual Manag Health Care. 2019 Jul/Sep;28(3):155-162. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000219.
8
Disentangling the rural-urban immunization coverage disparity in The Gambia: A Fairlie decomposition.解析冈比亚城乡免疫覆盖率差距:公平分解法。
Vaccine. 2019 May 21;37(23):3088-3096. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.062. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
9
Acceptability of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine, influenza knowledge and vaccine intent in The Gambia.冈比亚人群对鼻内接种减毒活流感疫苗的可接受性、流感知识和疫苗接种意愿。
Vaccine. 2018 Mar 20;36(13):1772-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.037. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania.谁从服务利用率的提高中受益?坦桑尼亚绩效付费的分配效应评估。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 29;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0728-x.