Orsini Muhsin Michael, Ewald D Rose, Strack Robert W
Independent Consultant, 6881 Ironwood Circle, Greensboro, NC, 27410, USA.
University of North Carolina-Greensboro, PO Box 26170, Greensboro, NC, 27402-6170, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Aug 13;19:101202. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101202. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Assessment of critical consciousness among individuals can provide a proxy measure of the readiness of communities, and individual decision-makers within, for social changes that address root causes of ill health. Critical consciousness, as conceived by Paolo Freire, emerges as a consequence of praxis. This iterative, recursive process of reflection and co-created knowledge enables community members to identify salient issues and the actions they want to take to address those issues. Public health and other social science researchers who engage in social- and population-level intervention work need a validated instrument that measures critical consciousness. Our purpose was to develop an instrument that can measure 4 key constructs of critical consciousness (passive adaptation, emotional engagement, cognitive awakening, and intentions to act) in an individual, relative to any salient community issue. We conducted two studies (Initial: June 2018; Retest: October 2019) to develop and validate this instrument. The same sampling strategy was used for both studies, but each study was conducted with a discrete cohort of participants. We used Amazon's Mechanical Turk to recruit and incentivize study participants. Data from the Initial study were used in an iterative process to evaluate construct validity and test our theoretical assumptions. Exploratory factor analyses were used to determine the best model fit that gave the greatest subscale reliability and validity. In the Retest study, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted and construct validity was verified. Our results indicated adequate construct validity as evidenced by good model fit. Additionally, the good fit of the data to the 4-factor structure confirmed our theoretical understanding of critical consciousness.
对个体的批判性意识进行评估,可以为社区以及其中的个体决策者应对旨在解决健康问题根源的社会变革的准备程度提供一个替代指标。保罗·弗莱雷所构想的批判性意识是实践的结果。这种反思与共同创造知识的迭代、递归过程,使社区成员能够识别突出问题以及他们想要采取的解决这些问题的行动。从事社会和人群层面干预工作的公共卫生及其他社会科学研究人员需要一种经过验证的工具来测量批判性意识。我们的目的是开发一种工具,能够针对任何突出的社区问题,测量个体批判性意识的4个关键构成要素(被动适应、情感投入、认知觉醒和行动意图)。我们进行了两项研究(初始研究:2018年6月;重测研究:2019年10月)来开发和验证该工具。两项研究采用了相同的抽样策略,但每项研究的参与者群体是不同的。我们利用亚马逊的Mechanical Turk平台招募并激励研究参与者。初始研究的数据被用于一个迭代过程,以评估结构效度并检验我们的理论假设。探索性因素分析用于确定能给出最大子量表信度和效度的最佳模型拟合。在重测研究中,进行了验证性因素分析并验证了结构效度。我们的结果表明结构效度良好,模型拟合良好即为证明。此外,数据与四因素结构的良好拟合证实了我们对批判性意识的理论理解。