• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于连续和二元数据基准剂量估计的扩展统一建模框架。

An extended and unified modeling framework for benchmark dose estimation for both continuous and binary data.

作者信息

Aerts Marc, Wheeler Matthew W, Abrahantes José Cortiñas

机构信息

Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Environmetrics. 2020 Nov;31(7). doi: 10.1002/env.2630. Epub 2020 May 16.

DOI:10.1002/env.2630
PMID:36052215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9432821/
Abstract

Protection and safety authorities recommend the use of model averaging to determine the benchmark dose approach as a scientifically more advanced method compared with the no-observed-adverse-effect-level approach for obtaining a reference point and deriving health-based guidance values. Model averaging however highly depends on the set of candidate dose-response models and such a set should be rich enough to ensure that a well-fitting model is included. The currently applied set of candidate models for continuous endpoints is typically limited to two models, the exponential and Hill model, and differs completely from the richer set of candidate models currently used for binary endpoints. The objective of this article is to propose a general and wide framework of dose response models, which can be applied both to continuous and binary endpoints and covers the current models for both type of endpoints. In combination with the bootstrap, this framework offers a unified approach to benchmark dose estimation. The methodology is illustrated using two data sets, one with a continuous and another with a binary endpoint.

摘要

保护与安全当局建议采用模型平均法来确定基准剂量方法,因为与无观察到不良反应水平方法相比,该方法在科学上更为先进,可用于获取参考点并推导基于健康的指导值。然而,模型平均法高度依赖于候选剂量反应模型集,且该模型集应足够丰富,以确保包含一个拟合良好的模型。目前用于连续终点的候选模型集通常限于两种模型,即指数模型和希尔模型,这与目前用于二元终点的更丰富的候选模型集完全不同。本文的目的是提出一个通用且广泛的剂量反应模型框架,该框架可同时应用于连续终点和二元终点,并涵盖这两种终点类型的当前模型。结合自助法,该框架提供了一种统一的基准剂量估计方法。使用两个数据集对该方法进行了说明,一个数据集具有连续终点,另一个具有二元终点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13e/9432821/dc7855e52c5b/nihms-1705328-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13e/9432821/50612f80c5fe/nihms-1705328-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13e/9432821/dc7855e52c5b/nihms-1705328-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13e/9432821/50612f80c5fe/nihms-1705328-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13e/9432821/dc7855e52c5b/nihms-1705328-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
An extended and unified modeling framework for benchmark dose estimation for both continuous and binary data.用于连续和二元数据基准剂量估计的扩展统一建模框架。
Environmetrics. 2020 Nov;31(7). doi: 10.1002/env.2630. Epub 2020 May 16.
2
Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.连续数据的模型不确定性与贝叶斯模型平均基准剂量估计
Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):101-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
3
Evaluation of subchronic toxicity data using the benchmark dose approach.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001 Feb;33(1):37-59. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1453.
4
The use of canonical dose-response models for benchmark dose analysis of continuous toxicological data.使用标准剂量反应模型进行连续毒理学数据的基准剂量分析。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2025;55(4):437-461. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2025.2464067. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
5
Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.更新:基准剂量法在风险评估中的应用。
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 24;15(1):e04658. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
7
A statistical evaluation of toxicity study designs for the estimation of the benchmark dose in continuous endpoints.用于估计连续终点基准剂量的毒性研究设计的统计评估。
Toxicol Sci. 2005 Mar;84(1):167-85. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi004. Epub 2004 Oct 13.
8
Comparing experimental designs for benchmark dose calculations for continuous endpoints.比较用于连续终点基准剂量计算的实验设计。
Risk Anal. 2006 Aug;26(4):1031-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00798.x.
9
Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.使用聚类定性数据对基准剂量和置信限进行自助法估计。
Risk Anal. 2007 Apr;27(2):447-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00897.x.
10
Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.风险评估中基准剂量法的使用指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Oct 25;20(10):e07584. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7584. eCollection 2022 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Semi-parametric benchmark dose analysis with monotone additive models.基于单调加性模型的半参数基准剂量分析。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae098.
2
ToxicR: A computational platform in R for computational toxicology and dose-response analyses.ToxicR:R语言中用于计算毒理学和剂量反应分析的计算平台。
Comput Toxicol. 2023 Feb;25. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100259. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Continuous Model Averaging for Benchmark Dose Analysis: Averaging Over Distributional Forms.用于基准剂量分析的连续模型平均法:对分布形式进行平均

本文引用的文献

1
Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.更新:基准剂量法在风险评估中的应用。
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 24;15(1):e04658. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling: current practice, issues, and challenges.基准剂量(BMD)建模:当前实践、问题与挑战。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 May;48(5):387-415. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1430121. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
Bayesian Quantile Impairment Threshold Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Endpoints.贝叶斯分位数损伤阈值基准剂量估计用于连续终点。
Environmetrics. 2022 Aug;33(5). doi: 10.1002/env.2728. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.风险评估中基准剂量法的使用指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Oct 25;20(10):e07584. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7584. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Risk Anal. 2017 Nov;37(11):2107-2118. doi: 10.1111/risa.12762. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Shape and steepness of toxicological dose-response relationships of continuous endpoints.连续终点毒理学剂量-反应关系的形态和陡峭度。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 Mar;44(3):270-97. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2013.853726. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
5
Information-theoretic model-averaged benchmark dose analysis in environmental risk assessment.环境风险评估中基于信息论模型平均的基准剂量分析
Environmetrics. 2013 May 1;24(3):143-157. doi: 10.1002/env.2201.
6
The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation.模型不确定性对基准剂量估计的影响。
Environmetrics. 2012 Dec;23(8):706-716. doi: 10.1002/env.2180.
7
Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.连续数据的模型不确定性与贝叶斯模型平均基准剂量估计
Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):101-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
8
Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1.基准剂量方法简介及美国环保署基准剂量软件(BMDS)版本 2.1.1。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Jul 15;254(2):181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
9
Properties of model-averaged BMDLs: a study of model averaging in dichotomous response risk estimation.模型平均BMDL的属性:二分类反应风险估计中的模型平均研究
Risk Anal. 2007 Jun;27(3):659-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00920.x.
10
Model averaging using fractional polynomials to estimate a safe level of exposure.使用分数多项式进行模型平均以估计安全暴露水平。
Risk Anal. 2007 Feb;27(1):111-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00863.x.