Suppr超能文献

终末期肝病模型 3.0 评分超过 40 分患者的死亡率。

Mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease above model for end-stage liver disease 3.0 of 40.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine , Stanford University School of Medicine , Redwood City , California , USA.

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery , Stanford University School of Medicine , Redwood City , California , USA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2023 Mar 1;77(3):851-861. doi: 10.1002/hep.32770. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to determine waitlist priority for liver transplant (LT) in 2002, the score has been capped at 40. Recently, the MELD 3.0 score was proposed to improve upon MELD-Na. Here, we examine waitlist mortality and LT outcomes in patients with MELD 3.0 ≥ 40 to assess the potential impact of uncapping the score.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adult waitlist registrations for LT from January 2016 to December 2021 were identified in the registry data from the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network. All MELD 3.0 scores were calculated at registration and thereafter. Waitlist mortality for up to 30 days was calculated as well as post-LT survival. There were 54,060 new waitlist registrations during the study period, of whom 2820 (5.2%) had MELD 3.0 ≥ 40 at listing. The 30-day waitlist mortality was high in these patients, yet it increased further in proportion with MELD 3.0 up to a score of 55 with 30-day mortality of 58.3% for MELD 3.0 of 40-44 and 82.4% for ≥50. The multivariable hazard ratio was 1.13 for each point of MELD 3.0, adjusting for several variables including acute-on-chronic liver failure. The number of LT recipients with MELD 40 at transplant increased from 155 in 2002 to 752 in 2021. Posttransplant survival was comparable across MELD strata including MELD of 35-39.

CONCLUSION

MELD 3.0 scores beyond 40 are associated with increasing waitlist mortality without adversely affecting posttransplant outcome. Uncapping the MELD score in waitlist candidates may lead to greater survival benefit from LT.

摘要

背景与目的

自 2002 年实施终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分以确定肝移植(LT)等待名单优先级以来,该评分的上限一直为 40。最近,提出了 MELD 3.0 评分以改进 MELD-Na。在这里,我们检查了 MELD 3.0≥40 的患者的等待名单死亡率和 LT 结果,以评估取消评分上限的潜在影响。

方法和结果

从器官采购和移植网络的登记数据中确定了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间成人 LT 的等待名单登记。所有 MELD 3.0 评分均在登记时和之后计算。还计算了最多 30 天的等待名单死亡率和 LT 后生存率。在研究期间,有 54060 名新的等待名单登记,其中 2820 名(5.2%)在登记时的 MELD 3.0≥40。这些患者的 30 天等待名单死亡率很高,但随着 MELD 3.0 的增加,比例进一步增加,最高达到 55 分,30 天死亡率为 40-44 分的 MELD 3.0 的 58.3%,50 分及以上的 MELD 3.0 的 82.4%。多变量危险比为 MELD 3.0 每增加 1 分 1.13,调整了几个变量,包括慢性肝衰竭急性加重。移植时 MELD 40 的 LT 受者数量从 2002 年的 155 例增加到 2021 年的 752 例。包括 MELD 35-39 在内的 MELD 各层的移植后生存率相当。

结论

超过 40 的 MELD 3.0 评分与等待名单死亡率的增加相关,而不会对移植后结果产生不利影响。取消等待名单候选人的 MELD 评分上限可能会使 LT 带来更大的生存获益。

相似文献

5
Natural history of NASH cirrhosis in liver transplant waitlist registrants.NASH 肝硬化在肝移植候补者中的自然史。
J Hepatol. 2023 Oct;79(4):1015-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.05.034. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

6
See the reality again in the field of liver transplantation.在肝移植领域再次审视现实。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;21(2):74-75. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00876-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验