• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease above model for end-stage liver disease 3.0 of 40.终末期肝病模型 3.0 评分超过 40 分患者的死亡率。
Hepatology. 2023 Mar 1;77(3):851-861. doi: 10.1002/hep.32770. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
4
Validating a novel score based on interaction between ACLF grade and MELD score to predict waitlist mortality.验证一种基于 ACLF 分级与 MELD 评分相互作用的新型评分,以预测等待移植患者的死亡率。
J Hepatol. 2021 Jun;74(6):1355-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Natural history of NASH cirrhosis in liver transplant waitlist registrants.NASH 肝硬化在肝移植候补者中的自然史。
J Hepatol. 2023 Oct;79(4):1015-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.05.034. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
A Share 21 model in liver transplantation: Impact on waitlist outcomes.肝移植中的A Share 21模型:对等待名单结果的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Aug;20(8):2184-2197. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15836. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
7
Effects of Allocating Livers for Transplantation Based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Scores on Patient Outcomes.基于终末期肝病模型-钠评分分配肝脏用于移植对患者结局的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1451-1462.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease exception policy and outcomes in pediatric patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome requiring liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型/小儿终末期肝病例外政策和需要肝移植的肝肺综合征小儿患者的结局。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Feb 1;29(2):134-144. doi: 10.1002/lt.26548. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
9
Improved Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Patients With Mid-MELD-Na Scores Listed in Centers Receptive to Use of Organs Donated After Circulatory Death.在接受使用循环死亡后捐献器官的中心接受 MELD-Na 评分中等的肝移植患者的候补名单结果得到改善。
Transplantation. 2024 Sep 1;108(9):1943-1953. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004955. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
10
End-stage liver disease patients with MELD >40 have higher waitlist mortality compared to Status 1A patients.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分>40的终末期肝病患者与1A类患者相比,等待名单上的死亡率更高。
Hepatol Int. 2016 Sep;10(5):838-46. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9735-4. Epub 2016 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Intention-to-treat approach for survival benefit of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation in patients with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores.终末期肝病模型评分高的患者接受ABO血型不相容活体肝移植生存获益的意向性治疗分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Jun 1;14(3):360-373. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-58. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
The impact of age and frailty on hospitalization and survival in older liver transplant recipients: a longitudinal cohort study.年龄和虚弱对老年肝移植受者住院及生存的影响:一项纵向队列研究
Front Aging. 2025 Apr 28;6:1539688. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1539688. eCollection 2025.
3
Disparities in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease Hospital Encounters Amongst a Texas-Based Cohort of Patients.德克萨斯州一组患者中酒精性肝病住院情况的差异
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Mar;61(6):988-999. doi: 10.1111/apt.18477. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
4
The Development and Appraisal of MELD 3.0 in Liver Diseases: Good Things Never Come Easy.终末期肝病模型(MELD)3.0在肝脏疾病中的发展与评估:好事多磨。
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2025 Jan 28;13(1):62-68. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2024.00303. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Common definitions and variables are needed for the United States to join the conversation on acute-on-chronic liver failure.美国需要共同定义和变量,以便参与到慢性加急性肝衰竭的讨论中。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Oct;24(10):1755-1760. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.06.021. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
6
See the reality again in the field of liver transplantation.在肝移植领域再次审视现实。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;21(2):74-75. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00876-y.

终末期肝病模型 3.0 评分超过 40 分患者的死亡率。

Mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease above model for end-stage liver disease 3.0 of 40.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine , Stanford University School of Medicine , Redwood City , California , USA.

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery , Stanford University School of Medicine , Redwood City , California , USA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2023 Mar 1;77(3):851-861. doi: 10.1002/hep.32770. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1002/hep.32770
PMID:36052665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10556544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to determine waitlist priority for liver transplant (LT) in 2002, the score has been capped at 40. Recently, the MELD 3.0 score was proposed to improve upon MELD-Na. Here, we examine waitlist mortality and LT outcomes in patients with MELD 3.0 ≥ 40 to assess the potential impact of uncapping the score.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adult waitlist registrations for LT from January 2016 to December 2021 were identified in the registry data from the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network. All MELD 3.0 scores were calculated at registration and thereafter. Waitlist mortality for up to 30 days was calculated as well as post-LT survival. There were 54,060 new waitlist registrations during the study period, of whom 2820 (5.2%) had MELD 3.0 ≥ 40 at listing. The 30-day waitlist mortality was high in these patients, yet it increased further in proportion with MELD 3.0 up to a score of 55 with 30-day mortality of 58.3% for MELD 3.0 of 40-44 and 82.4% for ≥50. The multivariable hazard ratio was 1.13 for each point of MELD 3.0, adjusting for several variables including acute-on-chronic liver failure. The number of LT recipients with MELD 40 at transplant increased from 155 in 2002 to 752 in 2021. Posttransplant survival was comparable across MELD strata including MELD of 35-39.

CONCLUSION

MELD 3.0 scores beyond 40 are associated with increasing waitlist mortality without adversely affecting posttransplant outcome. Uncapping the MELD score in waitlist candidates may lead to greater survival benefit from LT.

摘要

背景与目的

自 2002 年实施终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分以确定肝移植(LT)等待名单优先级以来,该评分的上限一直为 40。最近,提出了 MELD 3.0 评分以改进 MELD-Na。在这里,我们检查了 MELD 3.0≥40 的患者的等待名单死亡率和 LT 结果,以评估取消评分上限的潜在影响。

方法和结果

从器官采购和移植网络的登记数据中确定了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间成人 LT 的等待名单登记。所有 MELD 3.0 评分均在登记时和之后计算。还计算了最多 30 天的等待名单死亡率和 LT 后生存率。在研究期间,有 54060 名新的等待名单登记,其中 2820 名(5.2%)在登记时的 MELD 3.0≥40。这些患者的 30 天等待名单死亡率很高,但随着 MELD 3.0 的增加,比例进一步增加,最高达到 55 分,30 天死亡率为 40-44 分的 MELD 3.0 的 58.3%,50 分及以上的 MELD 3.0 的 82.4%。多变量危险比为 MELD 3.0 每增加 1 分 1.13,调整了几个变量,包括慢性肝衰竭急性加重。移植时 MELD 40 的 LT 受者数量从 2002 年的 155 例增加到 2021 年的 752 例。包括 MELD 35-39 在内的 MELD 各层的移植后生存率相当。

结论

超过 40 的 MELD 3.0 评分与等待名单死亡率的增加相关,而不会对移植后结果产生不利影响。取消等待名单候选人的 MELD 评分上限可能会使 LT 带来更大的生存获益。