Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (A.S.O., R.A., A.K., R.W.Y., R.K.W.).
Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (A.S.O.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Sep;15(9):e008762. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008762. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Medicare Advantage plans now provide health insurance coverage to >24 million older adults in the United States, and enrollment is increasing among individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether Medicare Advantage enrollment is associated with similar health care access, acute care utilization, and financial strain for adults with CVD compared with traditional Medicare is unknown.
We performed a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with CVD using the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association of Medicare program type (Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare) with measures of health care access, acute care utilization, and affordability.
The weighted population included 11 013 437 Medicare beneficiaries, of whom 3 922 104 (35.6%) were enrolled in Medicare Advantage, and 7 091 334 (64.4%) were enrolled in traditional Medicare. Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare enrollees were similar with respect to age, sex, racial/ethnic distribution, and household income; however, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were more likely to live in an urban setting (82.7% versus 76.0%; =0.01) and to be college educated (24.2% versus 19.0%; =0.01). Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were more likely to have a usual source of care (93.5% versus 88.9%; OR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.33-2.98)]; however, there were no other differences in health care access or utilization. Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were more likely to have problems paying medical bills (16.5% versus 11.6%; OR, 1.68 [1.17-2.40]) and to worry about paying medical bills (40.1% versus 33.8%; OR, 1.37 [1.07-1.76]) compared with those enrolled in traditional Medicare.
Adults with CVD in Medicare Advantage were more likely to experience financial strain related to their medical bills compared with those in traditional Medicare. As enrollment in Medicare Advantage grows, policy efforts should focus on ensuring care is affordable for patients with CVD.
在美国,医疗保险优势计划现在为超过 2400 万老年人提供医疗保险,并且心血管疾病(CVD)患者的参保人数正在增加。与传统医疗保险相比,医疗保险优势计划的参保是否与心血管疾病成年人相似的医疗保健获取、急性护理利用和经济压力相关尚不清楚。
我们使用 2019 年全国健康访谈调查对 65 岁或以上患有 CVD 的 Medicare 受益人进行了一项横断面研究。我们拟合了多变量逻辑回归模型,以检查医疗保险计划类型(医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险)与医疗保健获取、急性护理利用和负担能力衡量标准的关联。
加权人口包括 11013437 名 Medicare 受益人,其中 3922104 名(35.6%)参加了医疗保险优势计划,7091334 名(64.4%)参加了传统医疗保险。在年龄、性别、种族/族裔分布和家庭收入方面,医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险的参保人相似;然而,医疗保险优势计划的参保人更有可能居住在城市地区(82.7%对 76.0%;=0.01),并且受过大学教育(24.2%对 19.0%;=0.01)。医疗保险优势计划的参保人更有可能有一个常规医疗来源(93.5%对 88.9%;OR,1.99 [95%CI,1.33-2.98]);然而,在医疗保健获取或利用方面没有其他差异。医疗保险优势计划的参保人更有可能出现支付医疗费用的问题(16.5%对 11.6%;OR,1.68 [1.17-2.40])和担心支付医疗费用(40.1%对 33.8%;OR,1.37 [1.07-1.76]),与参加传统医疗保险的人相比。
与参加传统医疗保险的人相比,参加医疗保险优势计划的 CVD 成年人更有可能因医疗费用而面临经济压力。随着医疗保险优势计划的参保人数增加,政策努力应侧重于确保心血管疾病患者的医疗费用负担得起。