Suppr超能文献

医疗保险计划类型与癌症幸存者的医疗保健可及性、利用情况和可负担性之间的关联

Association of Medicare Program Type with Health Care Access, Utilization, and Affordability among Cancer Survivors.

作者信息

Jafri Faraz I, Patel Vishal R, Xu Jianhui, Polsky Daniel, Gupta Arjun, Hussaini Syed Mohammed Qasim

机构信息

Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;15(15):3964. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153964.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Medicare Advantage program provides care to nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries, including a rapidly growing population of cancer survivors. Despite its increased adoption, it is still unknown whether or not the program improves healthcare access, outcomes, and affordability for cancer survivors.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with a self-reported history of cancer from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between Medicare program type (Medicare Advantage vs. traditional Medicare) and measures of healthcare access, acute care utilization, and affordability.

RESULTS

We identified 4451 beneficiaries with a history of cancer, corresponding to 26.6 million weighted cancer survivors in 2019. Of the beneficiaries, 35.8% were enrolled in Medicare Advantage, whereas 64.2% were enrolled in traditional Medicare. The age, sex, racial and ethnic composition, household income, primary site of cancer, and comorbidity burden of Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries were similar. In the adjusted analysis, there were no differences in healthcare access or acute care utilization between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. However, cancer survivors enrolled in Medicare Advantage were more likely to worry about (34.3% vs. 29.4%; aOR, 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.5)) or have problems paying (13.6% vs. 11.1%; aOR, 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.8)) medical bills.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with cancer had better healthcare access, affordability, or acute care utilization than traditional Medicare beneficiaries did. Furthermore, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries were more likely to report financial strain and have difficulty paying for their medical bills than were those with traditional Medicare. Despite the generous benefits and attractive incentives, Medicare Advantage plans may not be more cost-effective than traditional Medicare is for cancer survivors. Our study informs ongoing congressional deliberations to re-evaluate the role of Medicare Advantage in promoting equity among beneficiaries with cancer.

摘要

背景

医疗保险优势计划为近一半的医疗保险受益人提供护理,其中癌症幸存者的数量正在迅速增长。尽管该计划的采用率有所提高,但它是否能改善癌症幸存者的医疗服务可及性、治疗效果和可负担性仍不明确。

方法

我们对2019年全国健康访谈调查中年龄≥65岁且自我报告有癌症病史的医疗保险受益人进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估医疗保险计划类型(医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险)与医疗服务可及性、急性护理利用率和可负担性指标之间的关联。

结果

我们确定了4451名有癌症病史的受益人,相当于2019年2660万加权癌症幸存者。在这些受益人中,35.8%参加了医疗保险优势计划,而64.2%参加了传统医疗保险。医疗保险优势计划受益人和传统医疗保险受益人的年龄、性别、种族和族裔构成、家庭收入、癌症原发部位以及合并症负担相似。在调整分析中,传统医疗保险受益人和医疗保险优势计划受益人在医疗服务可及性或急性护理利用率方面没有差异。然而,参加医疗保险优势计划的癌症幸存者更有可能担心(34.3%对29.4%;调整后比值比,1.3(95%置信区间,1.1 - 1.5))或支付医疗费用有问题(13.6%对11.1%;调整后比值比,1.4(95%置信区间,1.1 - 1.8))。

结论

我们没有发现证据表明患有癌症的医疗保险优势计划受益人比传统医疗保险受益人有更好的医疗服务可及性、可负担性或急性护理利用率。此外,与传统医疗保险受益人相比,医疗保险优势计划受益人更有可能报告经济压力和支付医疗费用困难。尽管有慷慨的福利和诱人的激励措施,但对于癌症幸存者来说,医疗保险优势计划可能并不比传统医疗保险更具成本效益。我们的数据为国会正在进行的重新评估医疗保险优势计划在促进癌症受益人公平性方面作用的审议提供了参考。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Financial Toxicity of Cancer Treatment.癌症治疗的经济毒性
JAMA Oncol. 2022 May 1;8(5):788. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7987.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验