• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从临床到社区:不列颠哥伦比亚省专科医疗机构中 2 型糖尿病成人患者的同伴支持模式随机对照试验。

From clinic to community: A randomized controlled trial of a peer support model for adults with type 2 diabetes from specialty care settings in British Columbia.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2022 Nov;39(11):e14931. doi: 10.1111/dme.14931. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14931
PMID:36052812
Abstract

AIMS

To examine the impact of a 12-month peer-led diabetes self-management support intervention delivered via telephone amongst adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from specialty care settings in British Columbia (BC).

METHODS

One-hundred ninety-six adults with T2D were randomly assigned to either a 12-month Peer-Led, Empowerment-based, Approach, to Self-management Efforts in Diabetes (PLEASED) intervention or a usual care condition. PLEASED involved weekly telephone contacts from a peer leader (PL) in the first 3 months followed by bi-weekly telephone contacts in the last 9 months. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome was HbA ; secondary outcomes included diabetes distress (DD), ApoB, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), body mass index, waist circumference and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

No within or between group changes were observed for HbA at 3 or 12 months. However, amongst participants with HbA  ≥ 69 mmol/mol (8.5%), the PLEASED group significantly lowered their HbA at 12 months [-11.7 mmol/mol (-1.07%); 95% CI: -20.7, -2.5 (-1.89, -0.23); p = 0.016] compared to usual care. Amongst secondary outcomes, within-group improvements in overall DD were found at 3 months (-0.21; 95% CI: -0.35, -0.08; p = 0.002) for the PLEASED group and at 12 months for both groups (PLEASED: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.21; p < 0.001 and control: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.19; p < 0.001), however, no between-group differences were observed. The PLEASED group improved systolic BP at 12 months (-5.4 mm Hg; 95% CI: -10.0, -0.8; p = 0.023) compared to usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in a peer support intervention in diabetes delivered via telephone leads to long-term improvements in HbA1c amongst high-risk adults with T2D living in BC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NT02804620).

摘要

目的

在不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)的专科医疗机构中,研究通过电话对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)成年人进行为期 12 个月的同伴主导的糖尿病自我管理支持干预对他们的影响。

方法

196 名 T2D 成年人被随机分配到 12 个月的同伴主导、以赋权为基础、自我管理努力的方法(PLEASED)干预组或常规护理组。PLEASED 包括在最初的 3 个月中每周与一名同伴领导(PL)进行电话联系,然后在接下来的 9 个月中每两周进行一次电话联系。在基线、3 个月和 12 个月时进行评估。主要结局是 HbA1c;次要结局包括糖尿病困扰(DD)、ApoB、收缩压和舒张压(BP)、体重指数、腰围和抑郁症状。

结果

在 3 个月或 12 个月时,HbA1c 未观察到组内或组间变化。然而,对于 HbA1c≥69mmol/mol(8.5%)的参与者,PLEASED 组在 12 个月时显著降低了他们的 HbA1c[-11.7mmol/mol(-1.07%);95%CI:-20.7,-2.5(-1.89,-0.23);p=0.016],与常规护理相比。在次要结局中,在 3 个月时,PLEASED 组的整体 DD 得到了改善(-0.21;95%CI:-0.35,-0.08;p=0.002),而两组在 12 个月时都得到了改善(PLEASED:-0.35;95%CI:-0.49,-0.21;p<0.001 和对照组:-0.33;95%CI:-0.47,-0.19;p<0.001),然而,组间没有差异。与常规护理相比,PLEASED 组在 12 个月时收缩压得到了改善(-5.4mmHg;95%CI:-10.0,-0.8;p=0.023)。

结论

在不列颠哥伦比亚省生活的 2 型糖尿病高危成年人中,通过电话进行同伴支持干预可长期改善 HbA1c。

试验注册

该研究在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NT02804620)。

相似文献

1
From clinic to community: A randomized controlled trial of a peer support model for adults with type 2 diabetes from specialty care settings in British Columbia.从临床到社区:不列颠哥伦比亚省专科医疗机构中 2 型糖尿病成人患者的同伴支持模式随机对照试验。
Diabet Med. 2022 Nov;39(11):e14931. doi: 10.1111/dme.14931. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Study protocol and baseline sample characteristics: From clinic to community: Using peer support as a transition model for improving long-term diabetes-related health outcomes.研究方案和基线样本特征:从临床到社区:利用同伴支持作为改善长期糖尿病相关健康结果的过渡模式。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;79:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Peer-Led, Empowerment-Based Approach to Self-Management Efforts in Diabetes (PLEASED): A Randomized Controlled Trial in an African American Community.同伴主导的糖尿病自我管理赋权方法(PLEASED):非裔美国人社区的一项随机对照试验
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S27-35. doi: 10.1370/afm.1819.
4
Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial.同伴领袖与社区卫生工作者在糖尿病自我管理支持中的比较效果:一项随机对照试验的结果
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1525-34. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2161. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
5
Outcomes at 18 Months From a Community Health Worker and Peer Leader Diabetes Self-Management Program for Latino Adults.社区健康工作者和同伴领导的糖尿病自我管理计划对拉丁裔成年人的 18 个月结果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1414-1422. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0978. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
6
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
7
Participant-Directed Intervention Tailoring Is Associated With Improvements in Glycemic Control for South Asian Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.参与者导向的干预措施定制与改善南亚 2 型糖尿病成年患者的血糖控制有关。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Apr;46(3):287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
8
Effect of Peer Mentors in Diabetes Self-management vs Usual Care on Outcomes in US Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.peer 导师在糖尿病自我管理中的作用与常规护理对美国 2 型糖尿病退伍军人结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2016369. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16369.
9
Peer Coaches to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Rural Alabama: A Cluster Randomized Trial.同伴教练改善阿拉巴马州农村地区糖尿病治疗效果:一项整群随机试验
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-26. doi: 10.1370/afm.1798.
10
Rethinking peer support for diabetes in Vancouver's South-Asian community: a feasibility study.温哥华南亚社区糖尿病同伴支持的反思:一项可行性研究。
Diabet Med. 2015 Aug;32(8):1077-84. doi: 10.1111/dme.12655. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of peer support on HbA1c levels in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持对中老年2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 28;13:e19803. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19803. eCollection 2025.
2
Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Diabetes Distress Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状、社会支持与糖尿病困扰的网络分析:一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jul 8;19:1951-1964. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S521735. eCollection 2025.
3
Lifestyle Interventions for Treatment and Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adults: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.
成人2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期治疗与缓解的生活方式干预:美国生活方式医学学院临床实践指南
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Jun 10;19(2 Suppl):10S-131S. doi: 10.1177/15598276251325488. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
A rapid systematic review of the effect of health or peer volunteers for diabetes self-management: Synthesizing evidence to guide social prescribing.对健康志愿者或同伴志愿者在糖尿病自我管理中作用的快速系统评价:综合证据以指导社会处方。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;4(12):e0004071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004071. eCollection 2024.