• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨第一印象与 MMIs 评分之间的关系:一项初步研究。

Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: a pilot study.

机构信息

Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), N41, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):519-536. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10151-5. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10459-022-10151-5
PMID:36053344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10169880/
Abstract

The phenomenon of first impression is well researched in social psychology, but less so in the study of OSCEs and the multiple mini interview (MMI). To explore its bearing on the MMI method we included a rating of first impression in the MMI for student selection executed 2012 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (196 applicants, 26 pairs of raters) and analyzed how it was related to MMI performance ratings made by (a) the same rater, and (b) a different rater. First impression was assessed immediately after an applicant entered the test room. Each MMI-task took 5 min and was rated subsequently. Internal consistency was α = .71 for first impression and α = .69 for MMI performance. First impression and MMI performance correlated by r = .49. Both measures weakly predicted performance in two OSCEs for communication skills, assessed 18 months later. MMI performance did not increment prediction above the contribution of first impression and vice versa. Prediction was independent of whether or not the rater who rated first impression also rated MMI performance. The correlation between first impression and MMI-performance is in line with the results of corresponding social psychological studies, showing that judgements based on minimal information moderately predict behavioral measures. It is also in accordance with the notion that raters often blend their specific assessment task outlined in MMI-instructions with the self-imposed question of whether a candidate would fit the role of a medical doctor.

摘要

第一印象现象在社会心理学中得到了广泛研究,但在 OSCE 和多项迷你面试(MMI)研究中则研究较少。为了探讨其对 MMI 方法的影响,我们在德国汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心(University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf)执行的 2012 年学生选拔 MMI 中包含了第一印象的评分(196 名申请者,26 对评分者),并分析了它与(a)同一评分者和(b)不同评分者做出的 MMI 表现评分之间的关系。第一印象是在申请人进入测试室后立即进行评估的。每个 MMI 任务需要 5 分钟,随后进行评分。第一印象的内部一致性为α=0.71,MMI 表现的内部一致性为α=0.69。第一印象和 MMI 表现之间的相关系数为 r=0.49。这两个指标都微弱地预测了 18 个月后进行的两项沟通技能 OSCE 的表现。MMI 表现并不能增加第一印象的贡献,反之亦然。预测与评分者是否评估第一印象和 MMI 表现无关。第一印象与 MMI 表现之间的相关性与相应的社会心理学研究结果一致,表明基于最小信息量的判断适度预测行为测量。这也符合评分者通常将他们在 MMI 指令中概述的特定评估任务与他们自行提出的候选人是否适合医生角色的问题结合起来的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10169880/5bf78403cff4/10459_2022_10151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10169880/5bf78403cff4/10459_2022_10151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10169880/5bf78403cff4/10459_2022_10151_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: a pilot study.探讨第一印象与 MMIs 评分之间的关系:一项初步研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):519-536. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10151-5. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI.探讨基于多站式迷你面试(MMI)中面试站点类型的社会人口统计学亚组差异及其对汉堡 MMI 预测公平性的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1674-z.
3
Are Female Applicants Rated Higher Than Males on the Multiple Mini-Interview? Findings From the University of Calgary.在多重迷你面试中,女性申请者的评分是否高于男性?来自卡尔加里大学的研究结果。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):841-846. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001466.
4
Seeing Things Differently or Seeing Different Things? Exploring Raters' Associations of Noncognitive Attributes.以不同视角看待事物还是看待不同的事物?探索评分者对非认知属性的关联。
Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11 Suppl):S50-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000902.
5
What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?与小组面试相比,多次小型面试有什么优势?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 11;21:29874. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29874. eCollection 2016.
6
How Medical School Applicant Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Relate to Multiple Mini-Interview-Based Admissions Outcomes: Findings From One Medical School.医学院申请者的种族、族裔和社会经济地位与基于多轮迷你面试的录取结果之间的关系:来自一所医学院的研究结果。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1667-74. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000766.
7
The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews.使用多重迷你面试时,明确的考试安全违规行为对录取结果的影响。
Med Educ. 2006 Jan;40(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02348.x.
8
Multiple mini-interview as a predictor of performance in the objective structured clinical examination among Physician Associates in the United Kingdom: a cohort study.多次小型面试作为英国医师助理客观结构化临床考试表现的预测指标:一项队列研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Apr 11;9:239-245. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S159412. eCollection 2018.
9
Using the multiple mini interview as an assessment strategy within the first year of a health professions curriculum.在健康专业课程的第一年使用多次迷你面试作为评估策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 3;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1203-5.
10
Qualitative analysis of MMI raters' scorings of medical school candidates: A matter of taste?医学生考生的 MMI 评分者评分的定性分析:口味问题?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):289-310. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9794-x. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Professional judgement: a social practice perspective on a multiple mini-interview for specialty training selection.专业判断:关于专科培训选拔多重小型面试的社会实践视角
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06535-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational approaches to the neuroscience of social perception.计算方法在社会感知神经科学中的应用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):827-837. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa127.
2
Selection and academic success of medical students in Hamburg, Germany.德国汉堡的医学生选拔与学业成就。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 16;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1443-4.
3
Validity evidence for the Hamburg multiple mini-interview.汉堡多站式面试的有效性证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 14;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1208-0.
4
Can physician examiners overcome their first impression when examinee performance changes?医师检查者能否克服第一印象,当受检者表现改变时?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Oct;23(4):721-732. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9823-4. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
Qualitative analysis of MMI raters' scorings of medical school candidates: A matter of taste?医学生考生的 MMI 评分者评分的定性分析:口味问题?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):289-310. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9794-x. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
The influence of first impressions on subsequent ratings within an OSCE station.第一印象对 OSCE 站后续评分的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):969-983. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9736-z. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions.整合人际知觉的社会与面部模型:趋同与分歧维度
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.组内评分者间变异性作为相互不一致性:确定评分者的不同观点。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Oct;22(4):819-838. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9711-8. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37.关于多重迷你面试(MMI)在本科健康项目选拔中的效用的证据:BEME系统评价:BEME指南第37号
Med Teach. 2016 May;38(5):443-55. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1158799. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Blinded by Beauty: Attractiveness Bias and Accurate Perceptions of Academic Performance.被美貌蒙蔽:吸引力偏差与对学术表现的准确认知
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148284. eCollection 2016.