Liver Research Unit, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 199, Tung Hwa North Road, Taipei, 105, Taiwan.
J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov;57(11):828-837. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01918-z. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Clinical and basic research in the past decades has achieved consensus in the understanding of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the management of chronic hepatitis B and HBV-cirrhosis. However, debatable challenges to the existing consensus in the concept and/or definitions have emerged. These include (1). alanine aminotransferase upper limit of normal: traditional laboratory-defined vs fixed; (2). nomenclature for phases of chronic HBV infection: classical vs EASL proposal; (3). indication of antiviral therapy: to treat patients vs to treat HBV; (4). finite vs indefinite long-term antiviral therapy: A. finite therapy in HBV-cirrhosis; B. retreatment decision: biochemical markers vs HBsAg/ALT kinetics. The pros and cons of these controversial issues were reviewed, assessed, and discussed in depth based on relevant lines of scientific evidence, intended to clarify or solve these controversial issues.
在过去几十年的临床和基础研究中,人们对于慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染的认识以及慢性乙型肝炎和 HBV 肝硬化的管理已经达成共识。然而,对于现有共识的概念和/或定义,出现了一些有争议的挑战。这些挑战包括:(1)丙氨酸氨基转移酶正常值上限:传统实验室定义与固定值;(2)慢性 HBV 感染阶段的命名:经典与 EASL 建议;(3)抗病毒治疗的适应证:治疗患者与治疗 HBV;(4)有限与无限期的长期抗病毒治疗:A. HBV 肝硬化中的有限治疗;B. 再治疗决策:生化标志物与 HBsAg/ALT 动力学。基于相关科学证据,对这些有争议的问题进行了详细的回顾、评估和讨论,旨在澄清或解决这些有争议的问题。