• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期使用表面活性剂和无创通气与插管和使用表面活性剂:一项倾向评分匹配的全国性研究。

Early surfactant and non-invasive ventilation versus intubation and surfactant: a propensity score-matched national study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jul;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001527.

DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001527
PMID:36053649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9335034/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcome after less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and primary endotracheal intubation (non-LISA) in infants born before gestational age (GA) 28 weeks.

SETTING

All neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Norway during 2012-2018.

METHODS

Defined population-based data were prospectively entered into a national registry. We compared LISA infants with all non-LISA infants and with non-LISA infants who received surfactant following intubation. We used propensity score (PS) matching to identify non-LISA infants who were similar regarding potential confounders.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

Rate and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), survival, neurological and gastrointestinal morbidity, and need of supplemental oxygen or positive pressure respiratory support at postmenstrual age (PMA) 36 and 40 weeks.

RESULTS

We restricted analyses to GA 25-27 weeks (n=843, 26% LISA) because LISA was rarely used at lower GAs. There was no significant association between NICUs regarding proportions treated with LISA and proportions receiving MV. In the PS-matched datasets, fewer LISA infants received MV (61% vs 78%, p<0.001), and they had fewer days on MV (mean difference 4.1, 95% CI 0.0 to 8.2 days) and lower mortality at PMA 40 weeks (absolute difference 6%, p=0.06) compared with all the non-LISA infants, but only a lower rate of MV (64% vs 97%, p<0.001) and fewer days on MV (mean difference 5.8, 95% CI 0.6 to 10.9 days) compared with non-LISA infants who received surfactant after intubation.

CONCLUSION

LISA reduced the rate and duration of MV but had no other clear benefits.

摘要

目的

比较胎龄(GA)<28 周的婴儿进行微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)和初次气管内插管(非-LISA)后的结局。

设置

2012 年至 2018 年期间挪威所有新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。

方法

前瞻性地将定义人群的基础数据输入国家登记处。我们将 LISA 婴儿与所有非-LISA 婴儿以及接受插管后表面活性剂治疗的非-LISA 婴儿进行比较。我们使用倾向评分(PS)匹配来识别潜在混杂因素相似的非-LISA 婴儿。

主要结局变量

机械通气(MV)的发生率和持续时间、存活率、神经和胃肠道发病率,以及胎龄(PMA)36 和 40 周时补充氧气或正压呼吸支持的需要。

结果

我们将分析限制在 GA 25-27 周(n=843,26%的 LISA),因为 LISA 在较低的 GA 很少使用。NICU 之间关于 LISA 治疗比例和 MV 接受比例没有显著差异。在 PS 匹配的数据集,接受 LISA 的婴儿接受 MV 的比例较低(61%比 78%,p<0.001),接受 MV 的天数也较少(平均差异 4.1,95%CI 0.0 至 8.2 天),并且在 PMA 40 周时死亡率较低(绝对差异 6%,p=0.06),与所有非-LISA 婴儿相比,但仅 MV 率较低(64%比 97%,p<0.001)和 MV 天数较少(平均差异 5.8,95%CI 0.6 至 10.9 天),与插管后接受表面活性剂治疗的非-LISA 婴儿相比。

结论

LISA 降低了 MV 的发生率和持续时间,但没有其他明显的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/4dc05da50ff5/bmjpo-2022-001527f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/66e1618ce93e/bmjpo-2022-001527f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/aefc18fe15ea/bmjpo-2022-001527f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/4dc05da50ff5/bmjpo-2022-001527f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/66e1618ce93e/bmjpo-2022-001527f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/aefc18fe15ea/bmjpo-2022-001527f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5c/9335034/4dc05da50ff5/bmjpo-2022-001527f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Early surfactant and non-invasive ventilation versus intubation and surfactant: a propensity score-matched national study.早期使用表面活性剂和无创通气与插管和使用表面活性剂:一项倾向评分匹配的全国性研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jul;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001527.
2
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
3
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
4
Should less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) become routine practice in US neonatal units?在美国新生儿病房中,是否应将侵入性更小的表面活性剂给药(LISA)常规化?
Pediatr Res. 2023 Apr;93(5):1188-1198. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02265-8. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
5
Treatment and outcome data of very low birth weight infants treated with less invasive surfactant administration in comparison to intubation and mechanical ventilation in the clinical setting of a cross-sectional observational multicenter study.在一项横断面观察性多中心研究的临床环境中,与气管插管和机械通气相比,接受较少有创性肺表面活性剂治疗的极低出生体重儿的治疗和结局数据。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;177(8):1207-1217. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3179-x. Epub 2018 May 28.
6
Evaluation of a respiratory care protocol including less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants.评估包括经鼻持续气道正压通气联合肺表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸管理方案
Pediatr Res. 2024 May;95(6):1603-1610. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02963-x. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
7
Three-year perinatal outcomes of less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者中应用 less invasive beractant 治疗的 3 年围产期结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2704-2710. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1557633. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
Comparison of Outcomes of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Prematurely Born Infants in the Delivery Suite and the Neonatal Unit.比较在产房和新生儿病房中对早产儿进行微创表面活性剂给药的效果。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2674-e2678. doi: 10.1055/a-2142-9434. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Clinical impact of less invasive surfactant administration using video laryngoscopy in extremely preterm infants.经视频喉镜使用微创肺表面活性物质给药对极早产儿的临床影响。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Mar;93(4):990-995. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02197-3. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Association of Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies With Mortality and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非侵入性通气策略与早产儿死亡率和支气管肺发育不良的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 9;316(6):611-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10708.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of surfactant administration by MIST and INSURE techniques in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.经MIST和INSURE技术给予表面活性剂治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 May-Jun;39(3):848-852. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.3.7283.
2
Respiratory Management of the Preterm Infant: Supporting Evidence-Based Practice at the Bedside.早产儿的呼吸管理:支持床边循证实践
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 10;10(3):535. doi: 10.3390/children10030535.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy vs Sham Treatment on Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The OPTIMIST-A Randomized Clinical Trial.微创表面活性剂治疗与假治疗对呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的死亡或支气管肺发育不良的影响:OPTIMIST 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2478-2487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21892.
2
Surfactant therapy via thin catheter in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome.经细导管给予表面活性物质治疗有或有发生呼吸窘迫综合征风险的早产儿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 10;5(5):CD011672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011672.pub2.
3
LISA/MIST: Complex clinical problems almost never have easy solutions.
丽莎/米斯特:复杂的临床问题几乎从来都没有简单的解决方案。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;26(2):101230. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101230. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus InSurE in preterm neonates of 28 to 34 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation-a randomized controlled trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗的 28 至 34 周呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿应用微创肺表面活性物质治疗与 InSurE 的随机对照研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Aug;179(8):1287-1293. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03682-9. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration for the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Study in China.微创表面活性剂给药治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征:中国多中心随机研究
Front Pediatr. 2020 May 7;8:182. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00182. eCollection 2020.
6
Effects of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) via a gastric tube on the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants aged 32 to 36 weeks.经胃管给予微创表面活性剂(LISA)对32至36周早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗效果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19216. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019216.
7
Surfactant therapy in premature babies: SurE or InSurE.早产儿肺表面活性物质治疗:SurE 还是 InSurE。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Nov;54(11):1747-1752. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24479. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Burden of hypoxia and intraventricular haemorrhage in extremely preterm infants.极早产儿缺氧和脑室内出血的负担。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 May;105(3):242-247. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316883. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
9
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南-2019 更新版。
Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中进行的微创表面活性剂给药
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Mar;29(3):226-330. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.