School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Sep;130(9):96001. doi: 10.1289/EHP9855. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Transnational immigration has increased since the 1950s. In countries such as the United States, immigrants now account for of the population. Although differences in health between immigrants and nonimmigrants are well documented, it is unclear how environmental exposures contribute to these disparities.
We summarized current knowledge comparing immigrants' and nonimmigrants' exposure to and health effects of environmental exposures.
We conducted a title and abstract review on articles identified through PubMed and selected those that assessed environmental exposures or health effects separately for immigrants and nonimmigrants. After a full text review, we extracted the main findings from eligible studies and categorized each article as exposure-focused, health-focused, or both. We also noted each study's exposure of interest, study location, exposure and statistical methods, immigrant and comparison groups, and the intersecting socioeconomic characteristics controlled for.
We conducted a title and abstract review on 3,705 articles, a full text review on 84, and extracted findings from 50 studies. There were 43 studies that investigated exposure (e.g., metals, organic compounds, fine particulate matter, hazardous air pollutants) disparities, but only 12 studies that assessed health disparities (e.g., mortality, select morbidities). Multiple studies reported higher exposures in immigrants compared with nonimmigrants. Among immigrants, studies sometimes observed exposure disparities by country of origin and time since immigration. Of the 50 studies, 43 were conducted in North America.
The environmental health of immigrants remains an understudied area, especially outside of North America. Although most identified studies explored potential exposure disparities, few investigated subsequent differences in health effects. Future research should investigate environmental health disparities of immigrants, especially outside North America. Additional research gaps include the role of immigrants' country of origin and time since immigration, as well as the combined effects of immigrant status with intersecting socioeconomic characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, income, and education attainment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9855.
自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,跨国移民有所增加。在美国等国家,移民现在占总人口的[X]%。尽管移民与非移民之间的健康差异有充分的记录,但环境暴露如何导致这些差异尚不清楚。
我们总结了当前的知识,比较了移民和非移民对环境暴露的接触程度和健康影响。
我们通过 PubMed 进行了标题和摘要审查,并选择了那些分别评估移民和非移民环境暴露或健康影响的文章。在全文审查后,我们从合格研究中提取主要发现,并将每篇文章归类为侧重于暴露、健康或两者兼有的文章。我们还注意到每个研究的关注暴露、研究地点、暴露和统计方法、移民和对照组以及控制的相交社会经济特征。
我们对 3705 篇文章进行了标题和摘要审查,对 84 篇文章进行了全文审查,并从 50 篇研究中提取了发现。有 43 项研究调查了暴露(例如,金属、有机化合物、细颗粒物、危险空气污染物)差异,但只有 12 项研究评估了健康差异(例如,死亡率、某些发病率)。多项研究报告称,移民的暴露水平高于非移民。在移民中,研究有时会观察到原籍国和移民时间的暴露差异。在 50 项研究中,有 43 项是在北美进行的。
移民的环境健康仍然是一个研究不足的领域,尤其是在北美以外地区。尽管大多数已确定的研究探讨了潜在的暴露差异,但很少有研究调查随后的健康影响差异。未来的研究应调查移民的环境健康差异,尤其是在北美以外地区。其他研究差距包括移民原籍国和移民时间的作用,以及移民身份与种族/民族、收入和教育程度等相交社会经济特征的综合影响。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9855.