Šoltysová M, Urbášek K, Pešl T, Havránek P, Ročák K, Poul J
Klinika dětské chirurgie, ortopedie a traumatologie, Fakultní nemocnice Brno a Lékařské fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, Brno.
Oddělení úrazové chirurgie, Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89(4):260-265.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This paper aims to detect, through a retrospective study, the migration of the tips of used metal implants (K-wires or a screw) in the direction out from the proximal femoral epiphysis as a part of studied basic radiometric characteristics of the cohort, with no intention of the authors to evaluate the therapy outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS It was a retrospective multicentre study including patients of two orthopaedic clinics and one department of orthopaedics treated in the period 2005-2018. The same treatment procedure was used in all three centres. The "in situ" fixation was indicated in patients, in whom the Southwick angle in anteroposterior and Lauenstein views was not much greater than 30°, whether primarily due to a mild slip or thanks to careful reduction either in acute or acute-on-chronic forms. All X-rays were measured by a single author (M.S.). In AP and Lauenstein view, overlap of the implant tip (K-wire or a screw) above the subcapital growth plate, the height of epiphysis and Southwick angle are measured at the beginning and at the end of treatment. In a smaller group of patients, also the inter-observer error (M.S. and J.P.) was identified. RESULTS K-wire transfixation was used in 43 patients (50 joints), with the mean age of 11.7 years and the mean duration of transfixation of 18.2 months. The slip of the implant tip out of the head, assessed separately for each introduced K-wire and then averaged, was in both views considered statistically significant (in AP view the level of significance was 5% (p-value = 1.393 x 10^(-6) < 0.05) , in Lauenstein view the level of significance was also 5% (p-value = 0.0001652 < 0.05)). The Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction was used. Transfixation by screw alternatively with one K-wire was used in 23 patients (28 joints), with the mean age of 12.4 years and the mean duration of transfixation of 14.4 months. The slip of the screw tip outside the head was assessed as significant (in AP view at the level of significance of 5% (p-value = 9.41 x 10^(-5) < 0.05), in Lauenstein view at the level of significance of 5% (p-value = 0.003557 < 0.05)). The Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction was used. DISCUSSION This paper aims to detect, through a retrospective study, the so-called migration of the tips of used metal implants (K-wires or a screw) outside the femoral head. Smooth and thin implants such as Kirschner wires should not compromise the continuing growth from subcapital growth plate contrary to the AO screw with threads in the femoral head, the screw head rested against the lateral cortical bone and the screw inserted as a compression one. Nonetheless, with some exceptions, the literature confirms the continued growth of the femoral neck even in the case of screws. In general, implants that do not compromise femoral neck growth provide an opportunity to remodel the anterolateral prominence of the femoral metaphysis, especially in younger patients. In agreement with other authors, the data from our study confirmed, even after a short period of time, a certain degree of proximal femoral remodelling expressed by changes in the Southwick angle. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirmed that in the case of "smooth" K-wires as well as cannulated screws the tips of both implants migrate outside the head. The differences were statistically significant. Therefore, the introduction of a conventional cannulated screw cannot be claimed to immediately produce the effect of epiphyseodesis. Yet, smooth implants less compromise the growth of the femoral neck, which is why they have recently been preferred. Key words: coxa vara adolescentium, metal implants, migration.
研究目的 本文旨在通过一项回顾性研究,检测用过的金属植入物(克氏针或螺钉)尖端向股骨近端骨骺外迁移的情况,作为所研究队列基本放射学特征的一部分,作者无意评估治疗效果。
材料与方法 这是一项回顾性多中心研究,纳入了2005年至2018年期间在两家骨科诊所和一个骨科科室接受治疗的患者。所有三个中心都采用相同的治疗程序。对于前后位和劳恩施泰因位Southwick角不大于30°的患者,无论主要是由于轻度滑脱还是因急性或急性转为慢性形式时的仔细复位,均采用“原位”固定。所有X线片均由同一作者(M.S.)测量。在前后位和劳恩施泰因位,分别在治疗开始和结束时测量植入物尖端(克氏针或螺钉)在股骨头下生长板上方的重叠情况、骨骺高度和Southwick角。在一小部分患者中,还确定了观察者间误差(M.S.和J.P.)。
结果 43例患者(50个关节)采用克氏针固定,平均年龄11.7岁,平均固定时间18.2个月。分别对每根插入的克氏针评估其尖端从股骨头脱出的情况,然后求平均值,在两种体位下均具有统计学意义(前后位显著性水平为5%(p值 = 1.393×10⁻⁶ < 0.05),劳恩施泰因位显著性水平也为5%(p值 = 0.0001652 < 0.05))。采用了带连续性校正的Wilcoxon符号秩检验。23例患者(28个关节)采用螺钉联合一根克氏针固定,平均年龄12.4岁,平均固定时间14.4个月。螺钉尖端脱出股骨头被评估为具有显著性(前后位显著性水平为5%(p值 = 9.41×10⁻⁵ < 0.05),劳恩施泰因位显著性水平为5%(p值 = 0.003557 < 0.05))。采用了带连续性校正的Wilcoxon符号秩检验。
讨论 本文旨在通过回顾性研究检测用过的金属植入物(克氏针或螺钉)尖端在股骨头外的所谓迁移情况。与股骨头有螺纹的AO螺钉不同,光滑且细的植入物如克氏针不应妨碍股骨头下生长板的持续生长,AO螺钉的螺钉头靠在外侧皮质骨上且作为加压螺钉插入。尽管如此,除了一些例外情况,文献证实即使在使用螺钉的情况下股骨颈仍能持续生长。一般来说,不影响股骨颈生长的植入物为重塑股骨干骺端的前外侧突出提供了机会,尤其是在年轻患者中。与其他作者一致,我们研究的数据证实,即使在短时间后,Southwick角的变化也表明股骨近端有一定程度的重塑。
结论 我们的研究证实,对于“光滑”的克氏针以及空心螺钉,两种植入物的尖端都会向股骨头外迁移。差异具有统计学意义。因此,不能声称传统空心螺钉的植入能立即产生骨骺固定的效果。然而,光滑的植入物对股骨颈生长的影响较小,这就是它们近来更受青睐的原因。
青少年髋内翻;金属植入物;迁移