Orthopaedic Department of the University Hospital Trencin, Legionarska 28, 911 71 Trencin, Slovakia.
Faculty of Health Care, Alexander Dubcek University of Trencin, Trencin, Slovakia.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89(4):286-292.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To compare topical and intravenous (IV) administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) 2 g in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 452 patients undergoing THA or TKA were randomised to 3 groups: 1) the IV TXA group received 2 doses of TXA 1 g intravenously 3 hours apart; 2) the topical TXA group received TXA 2 g topically, and 3) the NO TXA - control group. Furthermore, each group was divided in two subgroups by performed surgery (THA versus TKA). The following endpoints were used for final analysis: postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirement, haemoglobin drop and postoperative complications (haematoma, surgical site infection, thromboembolism, early surgical revision). RESULTS Both topical and IV administration of TXA significantly reduced postoperative bleeding (mean ± standard deviation) after THA and TKA (topical 504.4±281.0 ml, IV 497.3±251.7 ml, NO 863.1±326.4 ml, p<0.001). Topical use was superior to IV in reducing postoperative drainage output in THA (topical 377±213.3 ml, IV 518.1±259.0 ml, p<0.01). On the opposite, IV use was superior to topical in drainage output in TKA (topical 646.1±281.3 ml, IV 457.8±235.8 ml, p<0.01). The differences in transfusion requirement and Hb drop between these administration methods were not statistically significant (p≥0.05), but any TXA administration was significantly better than no TXA in all endpoints of efficacy (p<0.001). The lowest complication rate was observed in the topical group (NO 24%, IV 19%, topical 7.5%). DISCUSSION Consensus on optimal TXA dosing regime in primary hip and knee arthroplasties is still missing. Use of TXA therapy in routine clinical practice is highly individualized in accordance with the current approach of personalized medicine. Topical application seems to be the safest route of TXA administration. However, precise application technique is essential. IV TXA is beneficial especially in patients with some bleeding coagulopathies undergoing TKA with a tourniquet. Repeat doses of TXA are not usually necessary after completed primary arthroplasties. CONCLUSIONS IV and topical TXA 2 g have similar effect on reduction of transfusion requirements and haemoglobin drop in THA and TKA. The IV route is superior to topical in TKA while topical TXA reduces complications in both THA and TKA. Key words: tranexamic acid, total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, topical administration, intravenous administration.
比较氨甲环酸(TXA)2g 经静脉(IV)和局部途径给药在全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者中的应用。
共纳入 452 例行 THA 或 TKA 的患者,随机分为 3 组:1)IV TXA 组患者接受 2 次 1g TXA,每 3 小时静脉注射 1 次;2)局部 TXA 组患者接受 2g TXA 局部使用;3)NO TXA-对照组。此外,每组根据手术方式(THA 或 TKA)分为两个亚组。最终分析使用以下终点:术后出血量、输血需求、血红蛋白下降和术后并发症(血肿、手术部位感染、血栓栓塞、早期手术翻修)。
THA 和 TKA 后,局部和 IV 应用 TXA 均可显著减少术后出血(均值±标准差)(局部 504.4±281.0ml,IV 497.3±251.7ml,NO 863.1±326.4ml,p<0.001)。局部 TXA 在减少 THA 术后引流量方面优于 IV(局部 377±213.3ml,IV 518.1±259.0ml,p<0.01)。相反,IV 在 TKA 中引流量方面优于局部(局部 646.1±281.3ml,IV 457.8±235.8ml,p<0.01)。这些给药方式在输血需求和血红蛋白下降方面的差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05),但任何 TXA 给药均显著优于无 TXA 在所有疗效终点(p<0.001)。局部组的并发症发生率最低(NO 24%,IV 19%,局部 7.5%)。
在初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中,TXA 的最佳剂量方案尚未达成共识。TXA 治疗在常规临床实践中的应用具有高度的个体差异性,符合当前个性化医学的方法。局部应用似乎是 TXA 给药最安全的途径。然而,精确的应用技术至关重要。IV TXA 尤其适用于 TKA 中存在某些出血性凝血功能障碍且使用止血带的患者。完成初次关节置换后通常不需要重复使用 TXA。
IV 和局部 TXA 2g 在减少 THA 和 TKA 中的输血需求和血红蛋白下降方面具有相似的效果。IV 途径在 TKA 中优于局部,而局部 TXA 可降低 THA 和 TKA 的并发症发生率。
氨甲环酸、全髋关节置换术、全膝关节置换术、局部给药、静脉给药。