• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢羟氨苄(一种新型口服头孢菌素)与头孢氨苄治疗单纯性尿路感染的临床比较

Clinical comparison of cefadroxil, new oral cephalosporin, and cephalexin in uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

作者信息

Bolding O T

出版信息

Urology. 1978 Sep;12(3):321-4. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(78)90397-7.

DOI:10.1016/0090-4295(78)90397-7
PMID:360561
Abstract

Efficacy and safety of cefadroxil, a new oral cephalosporin, were compared with that of cephalexin in the treatment of 28 women with acute urinary tract infections. According to a randomized double-blind design, each patient received cefadroxil 1,000 mg. twice daily or cephalexin 500 mg. four times a day for ten days. Cures based on urine culture five to nine days post-treatment were obtained for all but 1 patient receiving cefadroxil; reinfection after eradication of the original pathogen was recorded for only 1 patient in each treatment group. No drug-related side effects or significant clinical laboratory abnormalities were observed during the study. Cefadroxil 1,000 mg. given twice daily was as effective and as well tolerated as cephalexin 500 mg. given four times daily. The significance of this dosage schedule advantage is discussed.

摘要

将一种新型口服头孢菌素头孢羟氨苄的疗效及安全性与头孢氨苄进行比较,以治疗28例急性尿路感染的女性患者。按照随机双盲设计,每位患者接受每日两次、每次1000mg的头孢羟氨苄治疗,或每日四次、每次500mg的头孢氨苄治疗,疗程为十天。除1例接受头孢羟氨苄治疗的患者外,所有患者在治疗后五至九天的尿培养结果均显示治愈;每个治疗组仅1例患者在根除原始病原体后出现再次感染。研究期间未观察到与药物相关的副作用或显著的临床实验室异常。每日两次给予1000mg头孢羟氨苄与每日四次给予500mg头孢氨苄的疗效及耐受性相当。本文讨论了这种给药方案优势的意义。

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of cefadroxil, new oral cephalosporin, and cephalexin in uncomplicated urinary tract infection.头孢羟氨苄(一种新型口服头孢菌素)与头孢氨苄治疗单纯性尿路感染的临床比较
Urology. 1978 Sep;12(3):321-4. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(78)90397-7.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of cefadroxil and cephalexin in treating acute urinary tract infections in woman.
J Int Med Res. 1980;8(Suppl 1):34-9.
3
A Critical Review of Cephalexin and Cefadroxil for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Infection in the Era of "Bad Bugs, Few Drugs".头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄治疗“坏菌耐药,用药有限”时代急性单纯性下尿路感染的系统评价
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Oct;56(4):106085. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106085. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil, cephalexin and cefadroxil in the treatment of patients with primary infections of the skin or skin structures.头孢呋辛酯、头孢氨苄和头孢羟氨苄治疗皮肤或皮肤结构原发性感染患者的临床比较。
Dermatologica. 1991;183(1):36-43. doi: 10.1159/000247629.
5
Treatment of urinary infections with cefadroxil: controlled comparison of high-compliance oral dosage regimens.用头孢羟氨苄治疗泌尿系统感染:高依从性口服给药方案的对照比较
Urology. 1980 Jan;15(1):40-3. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90537-3.
6
Treatment of acute urinary tract infections with cefadroxil administered once daily.
J Int Med Res. 1980;8(Suppl 1):29-33.
7
Comparison of pivmecillinam and cephalexin in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection.匹美西林与头孢氨苄治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000 Jan;13(3):183-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00118-1.
8
Cefadroxil. A review of its antibacterial, pharmacokinetic and therapeutic properties in comparison with cephalexin and cephradine.头孢羟氨苄。与头孢氨苄和头孢拉定相比,对其抗菌、药代动力学及治疗特性的综述。
Drugs. 1986;32 Suppl 3:1-16. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600323-00003.
9
Efficacy of cephalexin two vs. three times daily vs. cefadroxil once daily for streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.头孢氨苄每日两次与每日三次给药对比头孢羟氨苄每日一次给药治疗链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的疗效
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2003 Jul-Aug;42(6):519-26. doi: 10.1177/000992280304200606.
10
[Comparative studies of the efficacy, safety and usefulness of S6472, cefaclor and cephalexin on complicated urinary tract infection by the double-blind method].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1985 Oct;38(10):2735-69.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefadroxil. A review of its antibacterial, pharmacokinetic and therapeutic properties in comparison with cephalexin and cephradine.头孢羟氨苄。与头孢氨苄和头孢拉定相比,对其抗菌、药代动力学及治疗特性的综述。
Drugs. 1986;32 Suppl 3:1-16. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600323-00003.