Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Urology, Tonglu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
BMC Urol. 2022 Sep 3;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01091-8.
Drainage is indicated in many patients with a perinephric abscess (PA). Surgical drainage is associated with trauma and slow recovery, while percutaneous drainage can be ineffective in some patients. We report on 11 patients with PA treated by percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction under local anesthesia.
This case series included 11 PA patients operated on from January 2013 to June 2020. All patients received percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction. Data, including operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, volume of intraoperative pus suction, time of postoperative drainage tube indwelling, time to restore normal body temperature, length of postoperative hospital stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications, were collected.
The age of the patients was 59 (53-69) years. Eight, six, two, and two patients had hypertension, type 2 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and renal calculi, respectively. The operations were successful forall11 patients. Eight, two, and one patients required one, two, and three channels, respectively, to clear their abscess. The average operation time was 44 (30-65) min, and intraoperative blood loss was 16 (10-20) ml. The volume of intraoperative pus suction was 280 (200-400) ml, time of postoperative drainage tube indwelling was 8.2 (6-12) days, and time to restoring normal body temperature was 0.8 (0.5-2) days. The average postoperative hospital stay was 9.8 (7-14) days. No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. The postoperative follow-up time was typically 4.8 (3-8) months, and there were no recurrences.
Percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction might be a feasible method for treating PA.
许多肾周脓肿(PA)患者需要引流。手术引流会带来创伤和恢复缓慢的问题,而经皮引流在一些患者中可能无效。我们报告了 11 例 PA 患者在局部麻醉下接受经皮肾镜联合超声引导下负压吸引治疗的情况。
本病例系列纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间接受经皮肾镜联合超声引导下负压吸引治疗的 11 例 PA 患者。所有患者均接受经皮肾镜联合超声引导下负压吸引治疗。收集了包括手术时间、术中出血量、术中脓液抽吸量、术后引流管留置时间、体温恢复正常时间、术后住院时间以及术中、术后并发症在内的数据。
患者年龄为 59(53-69)岁。8 例、6 例、2 例和 2 例患者分别患有高血压、2 型糖尿病、类风湿关节炎和肾结石。所有 11 例患者的手术均获得成功。8 例、2 例和 1 例患者分别需要 1、2 和 3 个通道来清除脓肿。平均手术时间为 44(30-65)min,术中出血量为 16(10-20)ml。术中脓液抽吸量为 280(200-400)ml,术后引流管留置时间为 8.2(6-12)天,体温恢复正常时间为 0.8(0.5-2)天。平均术后住院时间为 9.8(7-14)天。无严重术中或术后并发症发生。术后随访时间为 4.8(3-8)个月,均无复发。
经皮肾镜联合超声引导下负压吸引可能是治疗 PA 的一种可行方法。