Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜检查联合超声引导下负压吸引治疗肾周血肿。

Percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound-guided negative-pressure suction for the treatment of perirenal hematoma.

作者信息

Zou Zhonglin, Liu Rui, Liu Zhengyu, Deng Yuanzhong

机构信息

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40857. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040857.

Abstract

Percutaneous renal puncture drainage is needed in patients with perirenal hematoma (PRH, renal around hematoma) with poor conservative treatment. Early and thorough removal of hematoma is closely related to the recovery of patients, but percutaneous renal drainage is not effective in some patients. The clinical data of 5 patients with PRH treated in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2020 to June 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 4 males and 1 female, with an average age of 58 (43-79) years. The hematoma was located on the left in 2 cases and on the right in 3 cases. The average maximum diameter of hematoma was 10.0 (6.4-13.4) cm. There were 2 cases of fever and low back pain. Three cases were complicated with hypertension. Severe hematuria occurred in 1 case. There were 1 case of PRH after rupture of renal tumor, 1 case of PRH after percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 1 case of PRH after percutaneous renal drainage and 2 cases of PRH after ureteroscopic stent implantation. All the 5 patients underwent percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound negative pressure aspiration under general anesthesia. The operation time, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, treatment effect and complications were analyzed. All the 5 operations were completed successfully, including 3 cases of single channel and 2 cases of double channel. The average operation time was (30-90) min, the average postoperative drainage tube indwelling time was 18 (6-30) days, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 15 (6-36) days. Abdominal computed tomography examination before discharge showed that the PRH was significantly reduced or even disappeared. Among them, 1 patient developed thrombocytopenia, which was related to the long-term use of teicoplanin before operation, and there were no serious complications during and after operation. The average follow-up time was 4 (1-12) months, and there was no recurrence of hematoma. Up to now, there is still no ideal treatment for large PRH. Percutaneous nephroscopy combined with ultrasound negative pressure aspiration under general anesthesia might be a feasible method for the treatment of giant renal around hematoma.

摘要

对于保守治疗效果不佳的肾周血肿(PRH,即肾周血肿)患者,需要进行经皮肾穿刺引流。早期彻底清除血肿与患者的康复密切相关,但经皮肾引流对部分患者效果不佳。回顾性分析了重庆医科大学附属第一医院2020年6月至2024年6月收治的5例PRH患者的临床资料。其中男性4例,女性1例,平均年龄58(43 - 79)岁。血肿位于左侧2例,右侧3例。血肿平均最大直径为10.0(6.4 - 13.4)cm。有2例出现发热和腰痛。3例合并高血压。1例出现严重血尿。肾肿瘤破裂后发生PRH 1例,经皮肾镜取石术后发生PRH 1例,经皮肾引流后发生PRH 1例,输尿管镜支架植入术后发生PRH 2例。5例患者均在全身麻醉下行经皮肾镜联合超声负压吸引术。分析手术时间、术后引流管留置时间、术后住院时间、治疗效果及并发症。5例手术均顺利完成,其中单通道3例,双通道2例。平均手术时间为(30 - 90)分钟,术后引流管平均留置时间为18(6 - 30)天,术后平均住院时间为15(6 - 36)天。出院前腹部CT检查显示PRH明显缩小甚至消失。其中1例患者出现血小板减少,与术前长期使用替考拉宁有关,手术中和术后均无严重并发症。平均随访时间为4(1 - 12)个月,血肿无复发。目前,对于巨大PRH仍没有理想的治疗方法。全身麻醉下经皮肾镜联合超声负压吸引术可能是治疗巨大肾周血肿的一种可行方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验