• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多基因风险评分与风险分层乳腺癌筛查:医疗保健专业人员的熟悉程度和观点。

Polygenic risk scores and risk-stratified breast cancer screening: Familiarity and perspectives of health care professionals.

机构信息

Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2022 Nov;24(11):2380-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.001
PMID:36057905
Abstract

PURPOSE

Health care professionals are expected to take on an active role in the implementation of risk-based cancer prevention strategies. This study aimed to explore health care professionals' (1) self-reported familiarity with the concept of polygenic risk score (PRS), (2) perceived level of knowledge regarding risk-stratified breast cancer (BC) screening, and (3) preferences for continuing professional development.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a bilingual-English/French-online questionnaire disseminated by health care professional associations across Canada between November 2020 and May 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 593 professionals completed more than 2 items and 453 responded to all questions. A total of 432 (94%) participants were female, 103 (22%) were physicians, and 323 (70%) were nurses. Participants reported to be unfamiliar with (20%), very unfamiliar (32%) with, or did not know (41%) the concept of PRS. Most participants reported not having enough knowledge about risk-stratified BC screening (61%) and that they would require more training (77%). Online courses and webinar conferences were the preferred continuing professional development modalities.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that health care professionals are currently not familiar with the concept of PRS or a risk-stratified approach for BC screening. Online information and training seem to be an essential knowledge transfer modality.

摘要

目的

医疗保健专业人员应在实施基于风险的癌症预防策略方面发挥积极作用。本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员(1)自我报告对多基因风险评分(PRS)概念的熟悉程度,(2)对风险分层乳腺癌(BC)筛查的知识感知水平,以及(3)对继续专业发展的偏好。

方法

2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 5 月,使用双语英语/法语在线问卷,通过加拿大各地的医疗保健专业人员协会进行了横断面调查。

结果

共有 593 名专业人员完成了超过 2 项内容,453 名专业人员回答了所有问题。共有 432 名(94%)参与者为女性,103 名(22%)为医生,323 名(70%)为护士。参与者报告说对 PRS 概念不熟悉(20%)、非常不熟悉(32%)或不知道(41%)。大多数参与者报告说他们对风险分层 BC 筛查的知识不足(61%),并且需要更多的培训(77%)。在线课程和网络研讨会会议是首选的继续专业发展模式。

结论

该研究表明,医疗保健专业人员目前对 PRS 或 BC 筛查的风险分层方法不熟悉。在线信息和培训似乎是一种重要的知识转移模式。

相似文献

1
Polygenic risk scores and risk-stratified breast cancer screening: Familiarity and perspectives of health care professionals.多基因风险评分与风险分层乳腺癌筛查:医疗保健专业人员的熟悉程度和观点。
Genet Med. 2022 Nov;24(11):2380-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes.基于多基因风险评分的风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国全科医生知识和态度的调查。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;14(3):732. doi: 10.3390/genes14030732.
3
Knowledge, views and expectations for cancer polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey of health professionals.知识、观点和对临床实践中癌症多基因风险检测的期望:一项对卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
Clin Genet. 2021 Oct;100(4):430-439. doi: 10.1111/cge.14025. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to breast cancer screening among female health care professionals: a cross sectional study.女性医护专业人员乳腺癌筛查相关的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0819-x.
5
Knowledge of risk factors, beliefs and practices of female healthcare professionals towards breast cancer in a tertiary institution in Lagos, Nigeria.尼日利亚拉各斯一所三级医疗机构中女性医疗专业人员对乳腺癌的风险因素、认知及行为的了解情况。
BMC Cancer. 2009 Mar 4;9:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-76.
6
Canadian Healthcare Professionals' Views and Attitudes toward Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening.加拿大医疗保健专业人员对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的看法和态度。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 21;13(7):1027. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071027.
7
Breast cancer awareness, risk factors and screening practices among future health professionals in Ghana: A cross-sectional study.加纳未来卫生专业人员的乳腺癌意识、风险因素和筛查实践:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253373. eCollection 2021.
8
Knowledge and Practices of Female Nurses at Primary Health Care Clinics in Gaza Strip-Palestine Regarding Early Detection of Breast Cancer.加沙地带初级保健诊所女性护士对乳腺癌早期检测的知识和实践。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Nov 1;22(11):3679-3684. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.11.3679.
9
Knowledge of risk factors, beliefs and practices of female healthcare professionals towards breast cancer, Morocco.摩洛哥女性医疗保健专业人员对乳腺癌的风险因素、认知及行为研究
Pan Afr Med J. 2011;10:21. doi: 10.4314/pamj.v10i0.72231. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
10
Knowledge, attitude about breast cancer and practice of breast cancer screening among female health care professionals: a study from Turkey.女性医疗保健专业人员对乳腺癌的认知、态度及乳腺癌筛查实践:一项来自土耳其的研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(11):3063-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardization, Education, and Resourcing: The Way Forward for Implementing Polygenic Risk Scores in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.标准化、教育与资源配置:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中实施多基因风险评分的未来之路
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug;18(8):e70323. doi: 10.1111/cts.70323.
2
Structural equation modeling of factors influencing women's attitudes, comfort and willingness toward risk-stratified breast cancer screening.影响女性对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的态度、舒适度和意愿的因素的结构方程模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13641-9.
3
Psychological and behavioural considerations for integrating polygenic risk scores for disease into clinical practice.
将疾病多基因风险评分纳入临床实践的心理和行为学考量
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02200-x.
4
Primary care providers' experience and satisfaction with personalised breast cancer screening risk communication: a descriptive cross-sectional study.初级保健提供者对个性化乳腺癌筛查风险沟通的体验与满意度:一项描述性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e093936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093936.
5
Acceptability of risk-based breast cancer screening among professionals and healthcare providers from 6 countries contributing to the MyPeBS study.来自参与MyPeBS研究的6个国家的专业人员和医疗服务提供者对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查的可接受性。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13848-z.
6
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.
7
Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.临床中的多基因风险评分:对利益相关者观点、态度和经历的系统评价
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;33(3):266-280. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01747-z. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
8
Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards polygenic risk testing for glaucoma.医疗保健专业人员对青光眼多基因风险检测的知识和态度。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec;52(9):957-972. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14438. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
9
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
10
Implementation considerations for risk-tailored cancer screening in the population: A scoping review.风险定制癌症筛查在人群中的实施考虑因素:范围综述。
Prev Med. 2024 Apr;181:107897. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107897. Epub 2024 Feb 18.