• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大医疗保健专业人员对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的看法和态度。

Canadian Healthcare Professionals' Views and Attitudes toward Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening.

作者信息

Lapointe Julie, Côté Jean-Martin, Mbuya-Bienge Cynthia, Dorval Michel, Pashayan Nora, Chiquette Jocelyne, Eloy Laurence, Turgeon Annie, Lambert-Côté Laurence, Brooks Jennifer D, Walker Meghan J, Blackmore Kristina Maria, Joly Yann, Knoppers Bartha Maria, Chiarelli Anna Maria, Simard Jacques, Nabi Hermann

机构信息

Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, 1050, Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada.

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050, Av de la Médecine, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 21;13(7):1027. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071027.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13071027
PMID:37511640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381377/
Abstract

Given the controversy over the effectiveness of age-based breast cancer (BC) screening, offering risk-stratified screening to women may be a way to improve patient outcomes with detection of earlier-stage disease. While this approach seems promising, its integration requires the buy-in of many stakeholders. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed Canadian healthcare professionals about their views and attitudes toward a risk-stratified BC screening approach. An anonymous online questionnaire was disseminated through Canadian healthcare professional associations between November 2020 and May 2021. Information collected included attitudes toward BC screening recommendations based on individual risk, comfort and perceived readiness related to the possible implementation of this approach. Close to 90% of the 593 respondents agreed with increased frequency and earlier initiation of BC screening for women at high risk. However, only 9% agreed with the idea of not offering BC screening to women at very low risk. Respondents indicated that primary care physicians and nurse practitioners should play a leading role in the risk-stratified BC screening approach. This survey identifies health services and policy enhancements that would be needed to support future implementation of a risk-stratified BC screening approach in healthcare systems in Canada and other countries.

摘要

鉴于基于年龄的乳腺癌筛查有效性存在争议,为女性提供风险分层筛查可能是一种通过检测早期疾病来改善患者预后的方法。虽然这种方法似乎很有前景,但要将其整合需要许多利益相关者的支持。在这项横断面研究中,我们调查了加拿大医疗保健专业人员对风险分层乳腺癌筛查方法的看法和态度。2020年11月至2021年5月期间,通过加拿大医疗保健专业协会分发了一份匿名在线问卷。收集的信息包括对基于个体风险的乳腺癌筛查建议的态度、对这种方法可能实施的舒适度和感知准备情况。593名受访者中近90%同意增加高危女性乳腺癌筛查的频率并提前开始筛查。然而,只有9%的人同意不对极低风险女性进行乳腺癌筛查的观点。受访者表示,初级保健医生和执业护士应在风险分层乳腺癌筛查方法中发挥主导作用。这项调查确定了在加拿大和其他国家的医疗保健系统中支持未来实施风险分层乳腺癌筛查方法所需的卫生服务和政策改进措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87d/10381377/7045dd626234/jpm-13-01027-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87d/10381377/683e9df7fd19/jpm-13-01027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87d/10381377/7045dd626234/jpm-13-01027-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87d/10381377/683e9df7fd19/jpm-13-01027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f87d/10381377/7045dd626234/jpm-13-01027-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Canadian Healthcare Professionals' Views and Attitudes toward Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening.加拿大医疗保健专业人员对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的看法和态度。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 21;13(7):1027. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071027.
2
Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada.女性对多因素乳腺癌风险评估和风险分层筛查的看法:来自加拿大四个省份的一项基于人群的调查。
J Pers Med. 2021 Feb 2;11(2):95. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020095.
3
Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme.实施风险分层后,医疗保健专业人员对国家乳腺癌筛查计划的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10134-0.
4
Polygenic risk scores and risk-stratified breast cancer screening: Familiarity and perspectives of health care professionals.多基因风险评分与风险分层乳腺癌筛查:医疗保健专业人员的熟悉程度和观点。
Genet Med. 2022 Nov;24(11):2380-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes.基于多基因风险评分的风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国全科医生知识和态度的调查。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;14(3):732. doi: 10.3390/genes14030732.
6
Knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning breast cancer, cervical cancer and screening among healthcare professionals and students in Mogadishu, Somalia: a cross-sectional study.索马里摩加迪沙医疗保健专业人员和学生对乳腺癌、宫颈癌及筛查的知识、态度和行为:一项横断面研究
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Oct 7;16:1455. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1455. eCollection 2022.
7
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
8
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
9
Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening.将低风险乳腺癌筛查途径引入国民保健制度乳腺筛查计划:实施风险分层筛查的医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211009746. doi: 10.1177/17455065211009746.
10
Organ Transplantation for Foreign Nationals in Canada: A Survey of Transplant Professionals.加拿大外国公民的器官移植:移植专业人员调查
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Jul 2;6:2054358119859530. doi: 10.1177/2054358119859530. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural equation modeling of factors influencing women's attitudes, comfort and willingness toward risk-stratified breast cancer screening.影响女性对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的态度、舒适度和意愿的因素的结构方程模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13641-9.
2
Primary care providers' experience and satisfaction with personalised breast cancer screening risk communication: a descriptive cross-sectional study.初级保健提供者对个性化乳腺癌筛查风险沟通的体验与满意度:一项描述性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e093936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093936.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Multifactorial Risk Assessment and Communication for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study Exploring Implementation in Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes.基于多基因风险评分的风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国全科医生知识和态度的调查。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;14(3):732. doi: 10.3390/genes14030732.
2
Polygenic risk scores and risk-stratified breast cancer screening: Familiarity and perspectives of health care professionals.多基因风险评分与风险分层乳腺癌筛查:医疗保健专业人员的熟悉程度和观点。
Genet Med. 2022 Nov;24(11):2380-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.
开展个性化乳腺癌筛查多因素风险评估与沟通的障碍及促进因素:一项探索加拿大实施情况的定性研究
Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;32(3):155. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030155.
4
Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening.应对风险:利益相关者对基于风险的宫颈癌筛查的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0317986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317986. eCollection 2025.
5
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.
6
Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes towards polygenic risk testing for glaucoma.医疗保健专业人员对青光眼多基因风险检测的知识和态度。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec;52(9):957-972. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14438. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
研究方案比较了“我的个人乳腺癌筛查”(MyPeBS)随机临床试验中个体化乳腺癌筛查与标准筛查的伦理、心理和社会经济影响。
BMC Cancer. 2022 May 6;22(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6.
4
The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery.实施风险分层筛查纳入国家乳腺癌筛查计划的可行性:一项针对负责实施人员的观点的焦点小组研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01730-0.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Personalized Breast Cancer Screening Program: Views of Spanish Health Professionals.实施个性化乳腺癌筛查计划的障碍和促进因素:西班牙卫生专业人员的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031406.
6
Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study.卫生专业人员对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查及其在西班牙国家卫生系统中的实施的看法:定性讨论组研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263788. eCollection 2022.
7
Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening and prevention: a systematic review with a focus on risk-adapted strategies.乳腺癌筛查和预防的成本效益:一项侧重于风险适应策略的系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Nov;22(8):1311-1344. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01338-5. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
How practice setting affects family physicians' views on genetic screening: a qualitative study.实践环境如何影响家庭医生对基因筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 1;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01492-y.
9
Personalized Risk Assessment for Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Integration and Implementation (PERSPECTIVE I&I).乳腺癌预防与早期检测的个性化风险评估:整合与实施(PERSPECTIVE I&I)
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 4;11(6):511. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060511.
10
Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening.将低风险乳腺癌筛查途径引入国民保健制度乳腺筛查计划:实施风险分层筛查的医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211009746. doi: 10.1177/17455065211009746.