• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌放射治疗中靶区和危及器官勾画的变异性:POTENTIAL 试验预试验基准病例的质量保证结果。

Variability of Target Volumes and Organs at Risk Delineation in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy: Quality Assurance Results of the Pretrial Benchmark Case for the POTENTIAL Trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer / Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep-Oct;12(5):397-408. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.018. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.018
PMID:36058618
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the variations in clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs at risk delineation within the quality assurance (QA) program of the POTENTIAL trial, which is a multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial evaluating postmastectomy radiation therapy (RT), with or without internal mammary nodal irradiation, for patients with high-risk breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The simulating computed tomography scan data set of a benchmark case was sent to the participating centers, and the delineation of CTVs and organs at risk was required to be completed by the investigators following protocol guidelines. All submitted contours were reviewed and compared with the reference contours created by the QA team, using quantitative geometric analysis regarding volume and the Jaccard Index (JCI), Dice similarity coefficient, Geographic Miss Index, Discordance Index, and mean distance to agreement. In addition to the whole-volume analysis of all structures, the combination contour of the supraclavicular fossa and level III and II axilla (CTVsc + axIII + axII) was further analyzed on a slice-by-slice basis.

RESULTS

The contours from 26 centers were reviewed and variations were observed between submission and reference. The variations of the CTV of the chest wall, contralateral breast, and heart were small, for which the mean JCI values were 0.62, 0.68, and 0.87, respectively. However, the mean JCI values of the CTV of the internal mammary nodal region, ipsilateral brachial plexus, left anterior descending coronary artery, and right coronary artery were 0.38, 0.21, 0.29, and 0.18, respectively, suggesting marked variations. In addition, marked under- and overoutlining variations were identified on 4 slices of CTVsc + axIII + axII on slice-by-slice analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There were residual contouring variations despite a detailed protocol being provided, confirming the importance of pretrial QA in RT and highlighting the need for education and consideration of a real-time central review of the target delineation before the trial participants begin RT.

摘要

目的

评估 POTENTIAL 试验质量保证 (QA) 计划中临床靶区 (CTV) 和危及器官勾画的变化,该试验为多中心随机 3 期试验,评估了高危乳腺癌患者接受乳房切除术放疗 (RT) 联合或不联合内乳淋巴结照射的效果。

方法与材料

基准病例的模拟 CT 扫描数据集被发送至参与中心,要求研究者按照方案指南完成 CTV 和危及器官的勾画。所有提交的轮廓都经过审查,并与 QA 团队创建的参考轮廓进行比较,使用有关体积和 Jaccard 指数 (JCI)、骰子相似系数、地理漏失指数、不吻合指数和平均一致性距离的定量几何分析。除了对所有结构的全体积分析外,还进一步对锁骨上窝和水平 III 和 II 腋窝的联合轮廓 (CTVsc+axIII+axII) 进行了逐层分析。

结果

共审查了 26 个中心的轮廓,观察到提交的轮廓与参考轮廓之间存在差异。胸壁、对侧乳房和心脏的 CTV 变化较小,其平均 JCI 值分别为 0.62、0.68 和 0.87。然而,内乳淋巴结区域、同侧臂丛神经、左前降支冠状动脉和右冠状动脉的 CTV 的平均 JCI 值分别为 0.38、0.21、0.29 和 0.18,表明存在明显的变化。此外,在逐层分析中,对 4 个 CTVsc+axIII+axII 层面的勾画进行了细致的分析,发现存在明显的勾画不足和过度的情况。

结论

尽管提供了详细的方案,但仍存在残留的勾画差异,这证实了 RT 前 QA 的重要性,并强调了在试验参与者开始 RT 之前,需要进行目标勾画的教育和考虑,并进行实时的中央审查。

相似文献

1
Variability of Target Volumes and Organs at Risk Delineation in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy: Quality Assurance Results of the Pretrial Benchmark Case for the POTENTIAL Trial.乳腺癌放射治疗中靶区和危及器官勾画的变异性:POTENTIAL 试验预试验基准病例的质量保证结果。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep-Oct;12(5):397-408. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.018. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Quality assurance in a phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of POstmastectomy radioThErapy in Node posiTive breast cancer with or without Internal mAmmary nodaL irradiation (POTENTIAL): a planning benchmark case.III 期、多中心、随机试验中的质量保证:乳腺癌术后放疗联合或不联合内乳淋巴结照射治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌(POTENTIAL):规划基准案例。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 29;18(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02379-1.
3
Delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in adjuvant radiotherapy of early breast cancer: national guidelines and contouring atlas by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.早期乳腺癌辅助放疗中靶区和危及器官的勾画:丹麦乳腺癌合作组的国家指南和勾画图谱。
Acta Oncol. 2013 May;52(4):703-10. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.765064. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
4
Clinical feasibility of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后乳腺癌患者基于深度学习的靶区体积和危及器官自动分割的临床可行性
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01771-z.
5
Contour variation is a primary source of error when delivering post prostatectomy radiotherapy: Results of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 08.03 Radiotherapy Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) benchmarking exercise.前列腺切除术后放疗时,轮廓变异是误差的主要来源:跨塔斯曼放射肿瘤学组08.03放疗辅助与早期挽救(RAVES)基准测试结果。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun;63(3):390-398. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12884. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
Pretrial Quality Assurance for Hypofractionated Salvage Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy in the Multi-Institutional PERYTON-trial.多机构PERYTON试验中前列腺切除术后大分割挽救性放射治疗的术前质量保证
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Sep 17;9(2):101379. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101379. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study.基于深度学习的自动勾画在乳腺癌靶区和危及器官勾画中观察者间一致性的评估:多中心研究中对 RTQA 计划的影响。
Breast. 2024 Feb;73:103599. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103599. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumor volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the pretrial benchmark case for the SCALOP trial.胰腺癌中研究者划定的大体肿瘤体积与质量保证的比较:SCALOP试验审前基准病例分析
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
Radiotherapy quality assurance of SBRT for patients with centrally located lung tumours within the multicentre phase II EORTC Lungtech trial: Benchmark case results.EORTC Lungtech 多中心 II 期临床试验中中央型肺部肿瘤 SBRT 的放疗质量保证:基准病例结果。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Mar;132:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Atlas Sampling for Prone Breast Automatic Segmentation of Organs at Risk: The Importance of Patients' Body Mass Index and Breast Cup Size for an Optimized Contouring of the Heart and the Coronary Vessels.俯卧位乳腺自动分割中危及器官的图谱采样:患者体重指数和胸罩罩杯尺寸对心脏和冠状动脉优化轮廓的重要性。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820920624. doi: 10.1177/1533033820920624.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical feasibility of Ethos auto-segmentation for adaptive whole-breast cancer treatment.用于适应性全乳癌治疗的Ethos自动分割的临床可行性
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 10;14:1507806. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1507806. eCollection 2024.
2
Geometric and dosimetric evaluation for breast and regional nodal auto-segmentation structures.乳腺和区域淋巴结自动分割结构的几何和剂量学评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Oct;25(10):e14461. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14461. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Quality assurance in a phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of POstmastectomy radioThErapy in Node posiTive breast cancer with or without Internal mAmmary nodaL irradiation (POTENTIAL): a planning benchmark case.
III 期、多中心、随机试验中的质量保证:乳腺癌术后放疗联合或不联合内乳淋巴结照射治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌(POTENTIAL):规划基准案例。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 29;18(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02379-1.
4
Robustness of Breast Margins with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy without a Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Couch: A Dosimetric Evaluation.无六自由度治疗床的容积调强弧形治疗中乳腺切缘的稳健性:剂量学评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 21;12(3):862. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030862.