Chung Seung Yeun, Chang Jee Suk, Choi Min Seo, Chang Yongjin, Choi Byong Su, Chun Jaehee, Keum Ki Chang, Kim Jin Sung, Kim Yong Bae
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01771-z.
BACKGROUND: In breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT), accurate target delineation and reduction of radiation doses to the nearby normal organs is important. However, manual clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) segmentation for treatment planning increases physicians' workload and inter-physician variability considerably. In this study, we evaluated the potential benefits of deep learning-based auto-segmented contours by comparing them to manually delineated contours for breast cancer patients. METHODS: CTVs for bilateral breasts, regional lymph nodes, and OARs (including the heart, lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, and thyroid) were manually delineated on planning computed tomography scans of 111 breast cancer patients who received breast-conserving surgery. Subsequently, a two-stage convolutional neural network algorithm was used. Quantitative metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance, and qualitative scoring by two panels from 10 institutions were used for analysis. Inter-observer variability and delineation time were assessed; furthermore, dose-volume histograms and dosimetric parameters were also analyzed using another set of patient data. RESULTS: The correlation between the auto-segmented and manual contours was acceptable for OARs, with a mean DSC higher than 0.80 for all OARs. In addition, the CTVs showed favorable results, with mean DSCs higher than 0.70 for all breast and regional lymph node CTVs. Furthermore, qualitative subjective scoring showed that the results were acceptable for all CTVs and OARs, with a median score of at least 8 (possible range: 0-10) for (1) the differences between manual and auto-segmented contours and (2) the extent to which auto-segmentation would assist physicians in clinical practice. The differences in dosimetric parameters between the auto-segmented and manual contours were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of deep learning-based auto-segmentation in breast RT planning was demonstrated. Although deep learning-based auto-segmentation cannot be a substitute for radiation oncologists, it is a useful tool with excellent potential in assisting radiation oncologists in the future. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
背景:在接受放射治疗(RT)的乳腺癌患者中,准确的靶区勾画以及减少对附近正常器官的辐射剂量非常重要。然而,用于治疗计划的手动临床靶区体积(CTV)和危及器官(OARs)分割会显著增加医生的工作量以及医生之间的差异。在本研究中,我们通过将基于深度学习的自动分割轮廓与乳腺癌患者的手动勾画轮廓进行比较,评估了其潜在益处。 方法:在111例接受保乳手术的乳腺癌患者的计划计算机断层扫描上手动勾画双侧乳房、区域淋巴结和OARs(包括心脏、肺、食管、脊髓和甲状腺)的CTV。随后,使用两阶段卷积神经网络算法。使用包括骰子相似系数(DSC)和95%豪斯多夫距离在内的定量指标以及来自10个机构的两个小组的定性评分进行分析。评估了观察者间的差异和勾画时间;此外,还使用另一组患者数据对剂量体积直方图和剂量学参数进行了分析。 结果:OARs的自动分割轮廓与手动轮廓之间的相关性是可以接受的,所有OARs的平均DSC均高于0.80。此外,CTV显示出良好的结果,所有乳房和区域淋巴结CTV的平均DSC均高于0.70。此外,定性主观评分表明,所有CTV和OARs的结果都是可以接受的,对于(1)手动和自动分割轮廓之间的差异以及(2)自动分割在临床实践中对医生的辅助程度,中位数得分至少为8(可能范围:0 - 10)。自动分割轮廓与手动轮廓之间的剂量学参数差异最小。 结论:证明了基于深度学习的自动分割在乳腺癌放疗计划中的可行性。虽然基于深度学习的自动分割不能替代放射肿瘤学家,但它是一种在未来辅助放射肿瘤学家方面具有巨大潜力的有用工具。试验注册 回顾性注册。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025-5-28
Front Oncol. 2024-12-10
Nat Commun. 2024-10-24
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020-7-10
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020-10
Front Oncol. 2020-4-28