Sakaguchi Keiko, Takemi Yukari, Hayashi Fumi, Akamatsu Rie
Faculty of Nutrition, Kagawa Nutrition University.
Faculty of Core Research, Natural Science Division, Ochanomizu University.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2023 Jan 18;70(1):3-15. doi: 10.11236/jph.22-031. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Objective The interim evaluation of Health Japan 21(second term), a national health promotion plan, suggested that improvements in the food environment did not lead to improvements in individual dietary habits. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the dietary behavior targets of Health Japan 21 (second term) and perceived food environment and health literacy.Method We conducted an online cross-sectional survey in March 2019 among adults aged 20-64 years. From the 9,667 registered monitors of the research firm, we collected 2,851 responses (29.5% response rate). The perceived food environment (how people perceive the local food environment) was estimated using the following six questions, namely, availability: easy access to nutritionally balanced meals, accessibility: no inconvenience in daily shopping, affordability: access to nutritionally balanced meals at reasonable prices, accommodation: easy access to food services within business hours, acceptability: satisfaction with the quality of food ingredients, and another form of acceptability: adequate food safety. Health literacy was evaluated using five questions related to information gathering, information selection, information transfer, information judgment, and self-determination. Last, we asked the respondents about two dietary behaviors, namely, the frequency of a balanced diet (defined as comprising the staple food, a main dish, and a side dish) and the quantity of vegetable intake, along with sociodemographic information. The analysis included 2,111 respondents, excluding those whose socioeconomic status was unknown. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between perceived food environment and health literacy on dietary behaviors, while adjusting for sociodemographic factors.Result A balanced diet was associated with the following perceptions of the food environment: "access to nutritionally balanced meals at reasonable prices" (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.37 [1.02, 1.82]; women), and "adequate food safety" (1.54 [1.19, 1.98]; men), and health literacy: "information gathering" (0.84 [0.73,0.97]; men) and "self-determination" (1.28 [1.10,1.50], 1.37 [1.14,1.63]; men, women). The quantity of vegetable intake was associated with the following perceptions of the food environment: "easy access to nutritionally balanced meals" (1.54 [1.15,2.06]; men), and "no inconvenience in daily shopping" (1.55 [1.12,2.15]; women), and health literacy: "information transfer" (1.30 [1.10,1.54]; men), and "self-determination" (1.67 [1.38,2.02]; women)).Conclusion To achieve a balanced diet and increased vegetable intake in a population, it is necessary to promote both the acquisition of a higher level of "self-determination" (rather than "information gathering") in health literacy and the creation of a heathy food environment.
目的 日本全国健康促进计划“健康日本21”(第二期)的中期评估表明,食物环境的改善并未带来个人饮食习惯的改善。本研究旨在评估“健康日本21”(第二期)的饮食行为目标与感知食物环境及健康素养之间的关系。
方法 2019年3月,我们对20 - 64岁的成年人进行了一项在线横断面调查。从该调研公司的9667名注册监测对象中,我们收集到了2851份回复(回复率为29.5%)。使用以下六个问题来评估感知食物环境(人们对当地食物环境的认知),即可得性:能否轻松获取营养均衡的膳食;可及性:日常购物是否便利;可承受性:能否以合理价格获取营养均衡的膳食;便利性:在营业时间内能否轻松获得食品服务;可接受性:对食品原料质量的满意度;以及另一种形式的可接受性:足够的食品安全。使用与信息收集、信息选择、信息传递、信息判断和自我决定相关的五个问题来评估健康素养。最后,我们询问了受访者两种饮食行为,即均衡饮食的频率(定义为主食、一道主菜和一道配菜)和蔬菜摄入量,以及社会人口统计学信息。分析纳入了2111名受访者,排除了社会经济地位未知的受访者。进行了多项逻辑回归分析,以确定在调整社会人口统计学因素的情况下,感知食物环境和健康素养与饮食行为之间的关系。
结果 均衡饮食与以下对食物环境的认知相关:“能以合理价格获取营养均衡的膳食”(调整后的优势比[95%置信区间]=1.37[1.02, 1.82];女性),以及“足够的食品安全”(1.54[1.19, 1.98];男性),还与健康素养相关:“信息收集”(0.84[0.73, 0.97];男性)和“自我决定”(1.28[1.10, 1.50],1.37[1.14, 1.63];男性、女性)。蔬菜摄入量与以下对食物环境的认知相关:“能轻松获取营养均衡的膳食”(1.54[1.15, 2.06];男性),以及“日常购物无不便”(1.55[1.12, 2.15];女性),还与健康素养相关:“信息传递”(1.30[1.10, 1.54];男性),以及“自我决定”(1.67[1.38, 2.02];女性)。
结论 为了在人群中实现均衡饮食和增加蔬菜摄入量,有必要促进健康素养中更高水平的“自我决定”(而非“信息收集”)的获得,并营造健康的食物环境。