• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高安全性的安全方法 - 机场安检点的有效协调策略。

A Safety Approach for Improving Security - Effective Coordination Strategies at the Airport Security Screening Checkpoint.

机构信息

Department of Research and Development, Zurich State Police, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1302-1314. doi: 10.1177/00187208221121411. Epub 2022 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1177/00187208221121411
PMID:36059249
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze effective teamwork at security checkpoints by investigating how security crews communicate in different (routine and threat) situations.

BACKGROUND

Working at an airport security screening checkpoint is challenging. Although tasks and processes are highly regulated and standardized due to legal requirements, security screeners must be trained to deal with unforeseen threat situations involving high levels of uncertainty. Therefore, security crews need to engage in flexible and adaptive coordination according to the situation and circumstances.

METHOD

We conducted a field study with 20 airport security screening crews comprising 100 security screeners. Teamwork in terms of interaction between crew members was measured, differentiating between proactive "push" communication and information on request representing "pull" communication. Furthermore, non-task related communication was assessed.

RESULTS

While crews showed non-task related communication more in routine situations, both task-related "push" and "pull" communication occurred more in threat situations. In terms of team performance, we could show significant positive effects of proactive "push" communication and non-task related interaction in threat situations.

CONCLUSION

Our results underscore the specific setting of airport security screening and the challenges that arise for teamwork. This study investigates professional screeners and passengers in the field. In contrast to other high-risk areas, security crews are confronted with a third party that complicates coordination strategies considered effective in previous studies.

APPLICATION

Our findings recommend situation-specific communication strategies for practical training for airport security screening crews.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过调查安全检查点的安全人员在不同(常规和威胁)情况下的沟通方式,分析有效的团队合作。

背景

在机场安检点工作具有挑战性。尽管由于法律要求,工作任务和流程受到高度监管和标准化,但安全人员必须接受培训,以应对涉及高度不确定性的意外威胁情况。因此,安全人员需要根据情况和环境进行灵活和适应性的协调。

方法

我们对 20 个机场安检小组进行了一项现场研究,其中包括 100 名安检人员。我们测量了团队成员之间的互动,区分了主动的“推动”沟通和代表“拉取”沟通的请求信息。此外,还评估了非任务相关的沟通。

结果

虽然在常规情况下,机组人员的非任务相关沟通较多,但在威胁情况下,任务相关的“推动”和“拉取”沟通都更多。在团队绩效方面,我们可以显示出在威胁情况下主动“推动”沟通和非任务相关互动的显著积极影响。

结论

我们的结果强调了机场安检的特定环境以及对团队合作的挑战。本研究在现场调查了专业安检人员和乘客。与其他高风险领域不同,安全人员面临着第三方,这使得在以前的研究中被认为有效的协调策略变得复杂。

应用

我们的研究结果为机场安检人员的实际培训推荐了具体情况的沟通策略。

相似文献

1
A Safety Approach for Improving Security - Effective Coordination Strategies at the Airport Security Screening Checkpoint.提高安全性的安全方法 - 机场安检点的有效协调策略。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1302-1314. doi: 10.1177/00187208221121411. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
2
Airport Security Screener Problem-Solving Knowledge and Implications.机场安检员问题解决知识及其影响。
Hum Factors. 2020 Dec;62(8):1265-1285. doi: 10.1177/0018720819874169. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
3
Visual inspection problem-solving strategies at different experience levels.不同经验水平下的目视检测问题解决策略。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Jul;118:104273. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104273. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
When and Why Threats Go Undetected: Impacts of Event Rate and Shift Length on Threat Detection Accuracy During Airport Baggage Screening.威胁何时以及为何未被发现:事件发生率和轮班时长对机场行李安检中威胁检测准确性的影响
Hum Factors. 2016 Mar;58(2):218-28. doi: 10.1177/0018720815616306. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
Coordination patterns related to high clinical performance in a simulated anesthetic crisis.与模拟麻醉危机中的高临床绩效相关的协调模式
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1606-15. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181981d36.
6
Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment.快速评估预测机场安检员视觉搜索能力
Hum Factors. 2018 Mar;60(2):201-211. doi: 10.1177/0018720817743886. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners.视检中的任务时间和任务负荷:一项对 X 光行李安检员进行的为期四个月的现场研究。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Sep;111:103995. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995. Epub 2023 May 17.
8
Automation in airport security X-ray screening of cabin baggage: Examining benefits and possible implementations of automated explosives detection.机场行李 X 光安检自动化:自动爆炸物探测的优势和可能实现的探讨。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Oct;72:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
Does hostile intent cause physiological changes? An airport security check simulation experiment.敌对意图是否会引起生理变化?一项机场安检模拟实验。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Jul;165:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.新培训的机场安检员中的患病率效应:训练有素的观察者也会错过罕见目标。
J Vis. 2013 Dec 2;13(3):33. doi: 10.1167/13.3.33.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of temporary nursing staff on communication patterns: an observation study during daily nurse huddles.临时护理人员对沟通模式的影响:日常护士碰头会期间的一项观察性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 1;14(2):e003242. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003242.
2
A dynamic decision-making approach for cabin unlawful interference emergency disposal using dynamic Bayesian network.一种基于动态贝叶斯网络的客舱非法干扰应急处置动态决策方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 16;14(1):19002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69842-1.