• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do obese patients benefit from a kinematic, appropriately designed total knee prosthesis?肥胖患者能否从运动学设计合理的全膝关节假体中获益?
J Orthop. 2022 Aug 3;34:147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.023. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
2
Temporal changes in sleep quality and knee function following primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.初次全膝关节置换术后睡眠质量和膝关节功能的时间变化:一项前瞻性研究。
Int Orthop. 2022 Feb;46(2):223-230. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05192-1. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
Short-term functional versus patient-reported outcome of the bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: prospective consecutive case series.双交叉韧带稳定型全膝关节置换术的短期功能与患者报告结局:前瞻性连续病例系列
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 16;15:435. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-435.
4
Functional versus patient-reported outcome of the bicruciate and the standard condylar-stabilizing total knee arthroplasty.双十字韧带与标准髁稳定型全膝关节置换术的功能与患者报告结局对比
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Apr;26(3):305-10. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1750-6. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
Does body mass index influence improvement in patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis of 3918 cases.体重指数是否会影响全膝关节置换术后患者报告结局的改善?对3918例病例的回顾性分析。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023 Jul 26;35(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00195-1.
6
Are There Differences in Micromotion on Radiostereometric Analysis Between Bicruciate and Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA? A Randomized Controlled Trial.全膝关节置换术中双髁与保留后交叉韧带设计的放射学分析微动是否存在差异?一项随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2045-2053. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001077.
7
A Single Surgeon Series Comparing the Outcomes of a Cruciate Retaining and Medially Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Kinematic Alignment Principles.单一外科医生系列研究:比较使用运动学对线原则的保留交叉韧带和内侧稳定型全膝关节置换术的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Feb;35(2):422-428. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Bicruciate-Stabilized or Posterior-Stabilized Knee Implants Provided Comparable Outcomes at 2 Years: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Patient Outcomes.采用双髁稳定或后稳定型膝关节假体的全膝关节置换术在 2 年时提供了可比的结果:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照、患者结局的临床试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3356-3363.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
The influence of obesity on achievement of a 'forgotten joint' following total knee arthroplasty.肥胖对全膝关节置换术后“被遗忘关节”疗效的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Mar;142(3):491-499. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03840-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
The higher patient-reported outcome measure group had smaller external rotation of the femur in bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.在双交叉韧带稳定型全膝关节置换术中,患者报告结局测量值较高的组股骨外旋较小。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1292-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06577-w. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical versus kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术的机械对线与运动学对线:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 25;145(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05835-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Function Subscales for Use in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Replacement Clinical Trials.髋关节疾病和骨关节炎结局评分以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分疼痛和功能分量表在全髋关节置换和全膝关节置换临床试验中的验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1200-1207.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.038. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
2
Midterm Performance of a Guided-Motion Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee System: Results From the International Study of Over 2000 Consecutive Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties.导引导向式双髁稳定型全膝关节系统的中期疗效:2000 多例初次全膝关节置换术的国际研究结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S201-S208. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
3
Patient-reported 1-year outcome not affected by body mass index in 3,327 total knee arthroplasty patients.在 3327 例全膝关节置换术患者中,患者报告的 1 年结局不受体重指数的影响。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):360-365. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1604940. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
The outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review of the literature.病态肥胖患者全膝关节置换术的结果:文献系统综述
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Apr;139(4):553-560. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03127-5. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
5
ACL Function in Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.前交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换中 ACL 的功能。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):e114. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00099.
6
Second-generation bi-cruciate stabilized total knee system has a lower reoperation and revision rate than its predecessor.第二代双交叉韧带稳定型全膝关节系统的再次手术率和翻修率低于其前代产品。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1591-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3019-5. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
7
In Vivo Kinematic Comparison of a Bicruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty and the Normal Knee Using Fluoroscopy.关节镜下观察双叉韧带稳定型全膝关节置换与正常膝关节的体内运动学比较
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.035. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Bicruciate-Stabilized or Posterior-Stabilized Knee Implants Provided Comparable Outcomes at 2 Years: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Patient Outcomes.采用双髁稳定或后稳定型膝关节假体的全膝关节置换术在 2 年时提供了可比的结果:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照、患者结局的临床试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3356-3363.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, a promising technology, that's not quite there.
Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(Suppl 1):S17. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.77.
10
Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey.膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分系统(KOOS)简版(JR)的验证:一项膝关节置换术短期疗效调查
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

肥胖患者能否从运动学设计合理的全膝关节假体中获益?

Do obese patients benefit from a kinematic, appropriately designed total knee prosthesis?

作者信息

Kolin David A, Carroll Kaitlin M, Ast Michael P, Mayman David J, Haas Steven B, Cushner Fred

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2022 Aug 3;34:147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.023. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.023
PMID:36060732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9437742/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the Journey 2 implant utilizes a bicruciate stabilized (BCS) technique. However, whether bicruciate stabilized TKA is equally effective across weight classes is unknown.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent primary bicruciate stabilized TKA during 2016 and 2017, at a single institution. All included patients had, at minimum, 2-year follow-up. Patients were categorized into body-mass index (BMI) groups as follows: underweight, normal, or overweight (<30 kg/m), obese (≥30 to <35 kg/m), and severely obese (≥35 kg/m). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were measured at baseline. Both KSS and KOOS JR, along with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), were also recorded at follow-up. Pre-operative, post-operative, and pre-to post-operative changes in PROMs were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression.

RESULTS

The 292 patients had a mean age of 64.8 years and mean BMI of 32.3 kg/m. There were 116 (39.7%) patients in the underweight, normal, or overweight group, 88 (30.1%) in the obese category, and 88 (30.1%) in the severely obese group. There were no differences between PROMs at baseline or at follow-up (p > 0.10 for all comparisons). There were also no differences in the improvement from pre-to post-operative KSS (p = 0.21) and KOOS JR (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Bicruciate stabilized TKA has similar effects on PROMs across BMI groups. These results suggest that bicruciate stabilized TKA is a viable treatment option both for low-weight and high-weight patients.

摘要

引言

采用Journey 2植入物的现代全膝关节置换术(TKA)运用了双交叉韧带稳定(BCS)技术。然而,双交叉韧带稳定型TKA在不同体重类别中是否同样有效尚不清楚。

方法

我们确定了2016年至2017年在一家机构接受初次双交叉韧带稳定型TKA的患者。所有纳入的患者至少有2年的随访。患者按体重指数(BMI)分组如下:体重过轻、正常或超重(<30kg/m²)、肥胖(≥30至<35kg/m²)和重度肥胖(≥35kg/m²)。在基线时测量患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)。在随访时还记录了膝关节协会评分(KSS)和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分青少年版(KOOS JR)以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)。使用方差分析(ANOVA)和线性回归分析PROMs的术前、术后以及术前至术后的变化。

结果

292例患者的平均年龄为64.8岁,平均BMI为32.3kg/m²。体重过轻、正常或超重组有116例(39.7%)患者,肥胖组有88例(30.1%),重度肥胖组有88例(30.1%)。基线时或随访时的PROMs之间没有差异(所有比较的p>0.10)。术前至术后KSS(p = 0.21)和KOOS JR(p = 0.62)的改善也没有差异。

结论

双交叉韧带稳定型TKA对不同BMI组的PROMs有相似影响。这些结果表明,双交叉韧带稳定型TKA对于低体重和高体重患者都是一种可行的治疗选择。