Neuwirth Lorenz S, Verrengia Michael T, Harikinish-Murrary Zachary I, Orens Jessica E, Lopez Oscar E
Department of Psychology, SUNY Old Westbury, Old Westbury, NY, United States.
SUNY Neuroscience Research Institute, SUNY Old Westbury, Old Westbury, NY, United States.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Aug 17;15:912146. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.912146. eCollection 2022.
Behavioral neuroscience tests such as the Light/Dark Test, the Open Field Test, the Elevated Plus Maze Test, and the Three Chamber Social Interaction Test have become both essential and widely used behavioral tests for transgenic and pre-clinical models for drug screening and testing. However, as fast as the field has evolved and the contemporaneous involvement of technology, little assessment of the literature has been done to ensure that these behavioral neuroscience tests that are crucial to pre-clinical testing have well-controlled ethological motivation by the use of lighting (i.e., Lux). In the present review paper, = 420 manuscripts were examined from 2015 to 2019 as a sample set (i.e., = ~20-22 publications per year) and it was found that only a meager = 50 publications (i.e., 11.9% of the publications sampled) met the criteria for proper anxiogenic and anxiolytic Lux reported. These findings illustrate a serious concern that behavioral neuroscience papers are not being vetted properly at the journal review level and are being released into the literature and public domain making it difficult to assess the quality of the science being reported. This creates a real need for standardizing the use of Lux in all publications on behavioral neuroscience techniques within the field to ensure that contributions are meaningful, avoid unnecessary duplication, and ultimately would serve to create a more efficient process within the pre-clinical screening/testing for drugs that serve as anxiolytic compounds that would prove more useful than what prior decades of work have produced. It is suggested that improving the standardization of the use and reporting of Lux in behavioral neuroscience tests and the standardization of peer-review processes overseeing the proper documentation of these methodological approaches in manuscripts could serve to advance pre-clinical testing for effective anxiolytic drugs. This report serves to highlight this concern and proposes strategies to proactively remedy them as the field moves forward for decades to come.
行为神经科学测试,如明暗箱试验、旷场试验、高架十字迷宫试验和三室社交互动试验,已成为转基因和临床前模型药物筛选和测试中必不可少且广泛使用的行为测试。然而,尽管该领域发展迅速且技术同步参与其中,但对文献的评估却很少,以确保这些对临床前测试至关重要的行为神经科学测试通过光照(即勒克斯)的使用具有良好控制的行为学动机。在本综述论文中,以2015年至2019年的420篇手稿作为样本集(即每年约20 - 22篇出版物)进行研究,发现只有区区50篇出版物(即所采样出版物的11.9%)符合报告的适当致焦虑和抗焦虑勒克斯标准。这些发现表明了一个严重的问题,即行为神经科学论文在期刊评审层面没有得到适当审查,就被发表到文献和公共领域,使得难以评估所报告科学的质量。这就迫切需要规范该领域内所有关于行为神经科学技术的出版物中勒克斯的使用,以确保研究成果有意义,避免不必要的重复,并最终在作为抗焦虑化合物的药物临床前筛选/测试中建立一个更高效的流程,这将比过去几十年的工作成果更有用。建议改进行为神经科学测试中勒克斯使用和报告的标准化,以及监督手稿中这些方法学方法正确记录的同行评审过程的标准化,这有助于推进有效的抗焦虑药物的临床前测试。本报告旨在突出这一问题,并提出在该领域未来几十年发展过程中积极补救这些问题的策略。