Kosciuszek Nina D, Kalta Daniel, Singh Mohnish, Savinova Olga V
New York Institute of Technology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Academic Medicine Scholar Program, Old Westbury, NY, United States.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 19;9:938567. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.938567. eCollection 2022.
Many patients treated with Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for anticoagulation have concomitant vascular or valvular calcification. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate a hypothesis that vascular and valvular calcification is a side-effect of VKA treatment.
We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that reported vascular or valvular calcification in patients treated with VKA. The associations between VKA use and calcification were analyzed with random-effects inverse variance models and reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In addition, univariate meta-regression analyses were utilized to identify any effect moderators.
Thirty-five studies were included (45,757 patients; 6,251 VKA users). The median follow-up was 2.3 years [interquartile range (IQR) of 1.2-4.0]; age 66.2 ± 3.6 years (mean ± SD); the majority of participants were males [77% (IQR: 72-95%)]. VKA use was associated with an increased OR for coronary artery calcification [1.21 (1.08, 1.36), = 0.001], moderated by the duration of treatment [meta-regression coefficient B of 0.08 (0.03, 0.13), = 0.0005]. Extra-coronary calcification affecting the aorta, carotid artery, breast artery, and arteries of lower extremities, was also increased in VKA treated patients [1.86 (1.43, 2.42), < 0.00001] and moderated by the author-reported statistical adjustments of the effect estimates [B: -0.63 (-1.19, -0.08), = 0.016]. The effect of VKA on the aortic valve calcification was significant [3.07 (1.90, 4.96), < 0.00001]; however, these studies suffered from a high risk of publication bias.
Vascular and valvular calcification are potential side effects of VKA. The clinical significance of these side effects on cardiovascular outcomes deserves further investigation.
许多接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)抗凝治疗的患者同时存在血管或瓣膜钙化。本荟萃分析旨在评估血管和瓣膜钙化是VKA治疗的一种副作用这一假设。
我们进行了系统的文献检索,以确定报告VKA治疗患者血管或瓣膜钙化情况的研究。使用随机效应逆方差模型分析VKA使用与钙化之间的关联,并以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)报告。此外,采用单变量meta回归分析来确定任何效应调节因素。
纳入了35项研究(45757名患者;6251名VKA使用者)。中位随访时间为2.3年[四分位间距(IQR)为1.2 - 4.0];年龄为66.2±3.6岁(均值±标准差);大多数参与者为男性[77%(IQR:72 - 95%)]。VKA使用与冠状动脉钙化的OR增加相关[1.21(1.08,1.36),P = 0.001],治疗持续时间起调节作用[meta回归系数B为0.08(0.03,0.13),P = 0.0005]。VKA治疗的患者中,影响主动脉、颈动脉、乳腺动脉和下肢动脉的冠状动脉外钙化也增加了[1.86(1.43,2.42),P < 0.00001],且作者报告的效应估计值的统计调整起调节作用[B: - 0.63( - 1.19, - 0.08),P = 0.016]。VKA对主动脉瓣钙化的影响显著[3.07(1.90,4.96),P < 0.00001];然而,这些研究存在较高的发表偏倚风险。
血管和瓣膜钙化是VKA的潜在副作用。这些副作用对心血管结局的临床意义值得进一步研究。