Martini Daniela, Marangoni Franca, Banterle Alessandro, Donini Lorenzo Maria, Riccardi Gabriele, Poli Andrea, Pellegrini Nicoletta
Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Nutrition Foundation of Italy, Milan, Italy.
Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 19;9:963592. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.963592. eCollection 2022.
The adoption of supplementary nutrition information, i.e., front-of-pack labeling (FOPL), on pre-packed food products is advocated as a tool to improve the consumers' knowledge of the nutrient content or the nutritional quality of foods, but also to drive products reformulation by the food industry. Ultimately, FOPL should help people to select foods in order to compose an overall balanced diet, which is essential for health. However, the extent to which the different FOPL systems proposed in the European Union (EU) (interpretative or informative) are effectively able to convey the information useful to improve both food choices and dietary habits of the consumers is still under debate and needs to be analyzed in detail. The use of 3 FOPL schemes proposed within the EU (Nutri-Score, Keyhole and NutrInform Battery) to compare products available on the Italian market within different food categories, highlights some critical issues: (1) different FOPL provide to consumers different kinds of information; (2) systems based on similar theoretical approaches can provide conflicting information; (3) the algorithms on which interpretative FOPL are based can give the same summary information for products differing in nutrient composition, impact on the overall dietary balance and therefore on the health of people with different characteristics, physiological/pathological conditions, and nutritional requirements; (4) on the other hand, products with similar nutrient composition can obtain different interpretative FOPL; (5) informative systems are generally more complex and require greater both attention and knowledge from the consumer; (6) FOPL based on 100 g of product overlook the role of portion (and frequency of consumption) in determining the nutrient intake without informing on the contribution of a single food to the overall diet; (7) FOPL based on scoring systems could promote the reformulation of selected products, especially with a composition very close to the threshold limits; (8) for the portion-based informative FOPL systems, the incentive for reformulation could essentially involve the reduction of portion size. Finally, the importance of nutritional education interventions, which are required to encourage the use by consumers of informative FOPL systems, cannot be neglected to improve the quality of diets regardless of the FOPL used.
提倡在预包装食品上采用补充营养信息,即包装正面标签(FOPL),作为一种工具,不仅可以提高消费者对食品营养成分或营养质量的了解,还可以推动食品行业进行产品重新配方设计。最终,FOPL应有助于人们选择食品,以构成总体均衡的饮食,这对健康至关重要。然而,欧盟(EU)提出的不同FOPL系统(解释性或信息性)在多大程度上能够有效地传达有助于改善消费者食品选择和饮食习惯的信息,仍在争论中,需要详细分析。使用欧盟内部提出的3种FOPL方案(营养评分、锁孔标识和营养信息电池)来比较意大利市场上不同食品类别中的现有产品,突出了一些关键问题:(1)不同的FOPL向消费者提供不同类型的信息;(2)基于相似理论方法的系统可能会提供相互矛盾的信息;(3)解释性FOPL所基于的算法可能会为营养成分不同、对总体饮食平衡以及因此对具有不同特征、生理/病理状况和营养需求的人群健康影响不同的产品给出相同的汇总信息;(4)另一方面,营养成分相似的产品可能会获得不同的解释性FOPL;(5)信息性系统通常更复杂,需要消费者给予更多关注和知识;(6)基于每100克产品的FOPL忽略了份量(和食用频率)在确定营养摄入量方面的作用,而没有告知单一食品对总体饮食的贡献;(7)基于评分系统的FOPL可能会促进选定产品的重新配方设计,特别是对于成分非常接近阈值限制的产品;(8)对于基于份量的信息性FOPL系统,重新配方设计的激励措施可能主要涉及减少份量大小。最后,无论使用哪种FOPL,为了改善饮食质量,鼓励消费者使用信息性FOPL系统所需的营养教育干预措施的重要性都不可忽视。