Suppr超能文献

德国所有地区短期空气污染暴露与新冠病毒病死亡率之间的关联:混杂因素的重要性

Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in all German districts: the importance of confounders.

作者信息

Miller Gregor, Menzel Annette, Ankerst Donna P

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstrasse 3, Garching, Germany.

Department of Life Science Systems, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Sci Eur. 2022;34(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12302-022-00657-5. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The focus of many studies is to estimate the effect of risk factors on outcomes, yet results may be dependent on the choice of other risk factors or potential confounders to include in a statistical model. For complex and unexplored systems, such as the COVID-19 spreading process, where a priori knowledge of potential confounders is lacking, data-driven empirical variable selection methods may be primarily utilized. Published studies often lack a sensitivity analysis as to how results depend on the choice of confounders in the model. This study showed variability in associations of short-term air pollution with COVID-19 mortality in Germany under multiple approaches accounting for confounders in statistical models.

METHODS

Associations between air pollution variables PM, PM, CO, NO, NO, and O and cumulative COVID-19 deaths in 400 German districts were assessed via negative binomial models for two time periods, March 2020-February 2021 and March 2021-February 2022. Prevalent methods for adjustment of confounders were identified after a literature search, including change-in-estimate and information criteria approaches. The methods were compared to assess the impact on the association estimates of air pollution and COVID-19 mortality considering 37 potential confounders.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses showed significant negative associations with COVID-19 mortality for CO, NO, and NO, and positive associations, at least for the first time period, for O and PM. However, these associations became non-significant when other risk factors were accounted for in the model, in particular after adjustment for mobility, political orientation, and age. Model estimates from most selection methods were similar to models including all risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Results highlight the importance of adequately accounting for high-impact confounders when analyzing associations of air pollution with COVID-19 and show that it can be of help to compare multiple selection approaches. This study showed how model selection processes can be performed using different methods in the context of high-dimensional and correlated covariates, when important confounders are not known a priori. Apparent associations between air pollution and COVID-19 mortality failed to reach significance when leading selection methods were used.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12302-022-00657-5.

摘要

背景

许多研究的重点是估计风险因素对结果的影响,然而结果可能取决于统计模型中其他风险因素或潜在混杂因素的选择。对于复杂且尚未探索的系统,如2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播过程,由于缺乏潜在混杂因素的先验知识,可能主要采用数据驱动的经验变量选择方法。已发表的研究往往缺乏关于结果如何依赖于模型中混杂因素选择的敏感性分析。本研究表明,在统计模型中考虑混杂因素的多种方法下,德国短期空气污染与COVID-19死亡率之间的关联存在差异。

方法

通过负二项模型评估2020年3月至2021年2月以及2021年3月至2022年2月这两个时间段内,德国400个地区空气污染变量(细颗粒物(PM)、可吸入颗粒物(PM)、一氧化碳(CO)、一氧化氮(NO)、二氧化氮(NO)和臭氧(O))与COVID-19累计死亡之间的关联。在文献检索后确定了常见的混杂因素调整方法,包括估计值变化法和信息准则法。考虑37个潜在混杂因素,对这些方法进行比较,以评估其对空气污染与COVID-COVID-19死亡率关联估计值的影响。

结果

单变量分析显示,CO、NO和NO与COVID-19死亡率呈显著负相关,而O和PM至少在第一个时间段呈正相关。然而,当模型中考虑其他风险因素时,尤其是在对流动性、政治倾向和年龄进行调整后,这些关联变得不显著。大多数选择方法的模型估计值与包含所有风险因素的模型相似。

结论

结果强调了在分析空气污染与COVID-COVID-19的关联时充分考虑高影响混杂因素的重要性,并表明比较多种选择方法可能会有所帮助。本研究展示了在高维且相关协变量的背景下,当重要混杂因素未知时,如何使用不同方法进行模型选择过程。当使用主要选择方法时,空气污染与COVID-19死亡率之间的明显关联未达到显著水平。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12302-022-00657-5获取补充材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验