• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种建立气腹的穿刺方法及其美容效果的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Comparison of Two Entry Methods and Their Cosmetic Outcomes in Creating Pneumoperitoneum: A Prospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Hiremath Srikantaiah Chandra Sekhariah, Ahmed Zameer

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, M. S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Surg J (N Y). 2022 Sep 2;8(3):e239-e244. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756182. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1756182
PMID:36062182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9439881/
Abstract

The main challenge in laparoscopic surgery is creating pneumoperitoneum using various surgical techniques. Every procedure has its own advocates. The aim of this study was to determine the cosmetic outcomes of the two of the major surgical techniques (open-Hasson technique versus closed-Veress technique) used in laparoscopic surgery.  This was a prospective, observational, comparative study conducted from October 2017 to September 2018 in 132 patients, who presented to our center and fulfilled our selection criteria. For all the patients, pneumoperitoneum was performed using either open (Hasson) or closed technique (Veress). A database was created for all the patients and the technique dependent cosmetic outcomes were assessed and reported.  There were a total of 66 patients in each group (open and closed). The mean age of the open group was 51.56±11.42 years and closed group was 54.36±14.78 years, respectively. The major comorbidities found in both the groups were diabetes mellitus (6/66, group A; 7/66, group B) and hypertension (3/66, group A; 4/66, group B). In open group, umbilical (58/66, =0.001) and in closed group infraumbilical (35/66, =0.001) were the most commonly used incisions.  As benefits outweigh the risks, the better cosmetic outcomes were observed in patients underwent closed technique over open technique ( <0.05).

摘要

腹腔镜手术的主要挑战在于运用各种手术技术建立气腹。每种手术方法都有其支持者。本研究的目的是确定腹腔镜手术中两种主要手术技术(开放哈森技术与闭合韦雷斯技术)的美容效果。

这是一项前瞻性、观察性、对比性研究,于2017年10月至2018年9月对132例符合我们选择标准并前来本中心就诊的患者进行。所有患者均采用开放(哈森)或闭合技术(韦雷斯)建立气腹。为所有患者建立了一个数据库,并对与技术相关的美容效果进行了评估和报告。

每组(开放组和闭合组)各有66例患者。开放组的平均年龄为51.56±11.42岁,闭合组为54.36±14.78岁。两组中发现的主要合并症均为糖尿病(A组6/66;B组7/66)和高血压(A组3/66;B组4/66)。开放组最常用的切口是脐部(58/66,P = 0.001),闭合组是脐下(35/66,P = 0.001)。

由于益处大于风险,接受闭合技术的患者比接受开放技术的患者美容效果更好(P < 0.05)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90c/9439881/b7df1f7698a5/10-1055-s-0042-1756182-itsj-22-00023-oa-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90c/9439881/b7df1f7698a5/10-1055-s-0042-1756182-itsj-22-00023-oa-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c90c/9439881/b7df1f7698a5/10-1055-s-0042-1756182-itsj-22-00023-oa-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two Entry Methods and Their Cosmetic Outcomes in Creating Pneumoperitoneum: A Prospective Observational Study.两种建立气腹的穿刺方法及其美容效果的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Surg J (N Y). 2022 Sep 2;8(3):e239-e244. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756182. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
A Comparison of Times Taken for the Placement of the First Portal and Complication Rates between the Veress Needle Technique and the Modified Hasson Technique in Canine Ovariectomy Laparoscopic Surgery.犬卵巢切除术腹腔镜手术中Veress针技术与改良Hasson技术首次穿刺孔放置时间及并发症发生率的比较
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;11(10):2936. doi: 10.3390/ani11102936.
3
Evaluation of Open (Hasson's) and Closed (Veress) Technique of Intraperitoneal Access for Creation of Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery.腹腔镜手术中用于建立气腹的开放式(哈森氏)和闭合式(韦雷斯氏)腹腔穿刺技术的评估
Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54770. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54770. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.腹腔镜入路:技术、科技与并发症综述
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2.
5
Complications of Veress Needle Versus Open Technique in Abdominal Surgeries.腹部手术中Veress针与开放技术的并发症
Cureus. 2021 May 9;13(5):e14926. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14926.
6
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 31;8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.
7
[Risks associated with laparoscopic entry].[腹腔镜穿刺相关风险]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010 Dec;39(8 Suppl 2):S123-35. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2315(10)70039-9.
8
Comparison Between Closed and Open Methods for Creating Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中建立气腹的闭合式与开放式方法比较
Cureus. 2023 Mar 10;15(3):e35991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35991. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
[Our choice of the method to induce pneumoperitoneum in videolaparoscopic surgery].[我们在视频腹腔镜手术中诱导气腹的方法选择]
Minerva Chir. 2000 May;55(5):371-5.
10
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal access in laparoscopic surgery of obese patients: a novel abdominal access technique.肥胖患者腹腔镜手术中的腹部入路:一种新的腹部入路技术。
Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Jul-Aug;43(4):236-242. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.236. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Times Taken for the Placement of the First Portal and Complication Rates between the Veress Needle Technique and the Modified Hasson Technique in Canine Ovariectomy Laparoscopic Surgery.犬卵巢切除术腹腔镜手术中Veress针技术与改良Hasson技术首次穿刺孔放置时间及并发症发生率的比较
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;11(10):2936. doi: 10.3390/ani11102936.
2
Complications of Veress Needle Versus Open Technique in Abdominal Surgeries.腹部手术中Veress针与开放技术的并发症
Cureus. 2021 May 9;13(5):e14926. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14926.
3
Fast, Easy, and Safe Establishment of Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery: The Fingertip Technique.
快速、简便、安全的腹腔镜气腹建立:指尖技术。
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00069.
4
Veress Needle Creation of Pneumoperitoneum: a Safe Technique.Veress针建立气腹:一种安全技术。
Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):2026-2027. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04435-1.
5
Cosmetic outcomes of infraumbilical, supraumbilical, and transumbilical entry routes in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中脐下、脐上及经脐入路的美容效果。
Turk J Surg. 2018 Aug 28;34(4):290-294. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.4025.
6
Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.使用EASY-EYE_C评估传统甲状腺切除术后的美容效果:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Nov;93(5):231-239. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.5.231. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
7
What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.温哥华瘢痕量表的多少分算作增生性瘢痕?北美烧伤护理提供者调查的结果。
Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
8
Perioperative outcomes and cosmesis analysis of patients undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: a comparison of transumbilical, transperitoneal subcostal, and retroperitoneal subcostal approaches.经脐、经腹腔肋缘下和经腹膜后入路腹腔镜下单部位肾上腺切除术患者的围手术期结果和美容效果分析。
Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):358-64. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.060.
9
Abnormal pigmentation within cutaneous scars: A complication of wound healing.皮肤瘢痕内的色素沉着异常:伤口愈合的一种并发症。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2012 May;45(2):403-11. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.101328.
10
Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.腹腔镜端口进入两种方法的比较:技术视角
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:305428. doi: 10.1155/2012/305428. Epub 2012 Jun 13.