Universidad de Salamanca, InFoAutismo, Instituto Universitario de Integración en La Comunidad (INICO), Salamanca, Spain.
Zamora Hospital (Complejo Asistencial de Zamora), Zamora, Spain.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Apr;273(3):719-730. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01466-w. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
As assessed by numerous neuropsychological tasks, individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) have similar impairments related to executive functions (EFs). The neuropsychological profile of these two conditions was examined using the three-component EFs' framework of Miyake and Friedman (Cogn Psychol 41(1):49-100, 2000). This approach assesses Inhibition (suppression of unwanted and irrelevant information/responses), Updating (use and control of contents of working memory), and Shifting (disengagement between activities or mental tasks) using nine different tasks. In line with previous research, we expected greater performance deficits in ASD in all three components compared to SSD, as well as faster responses for the SSD group. A self-paced task format allowed us to examine whether unlimited time given for a task would lead to better performance. The sample was constituted by the control group (N = 25), ASD group (N = 24), and SSD group (N = 12). Groups did not differ on Inhibition performance. In Updating, individuals with SSD performed poorer than the other groups. As for Shifting, both groups demonstrated poorer performance compared to controls, with the SSD group presenting the greatest difficulties. In terms of reaction time (RT), SSD participants' RT were the slowest on Inhibition and Shifting tasks. There was a positive correlation between performance and time spent on Inhibition and Shifting only for the SSD group, which demonstrates that their performance improves when there are no time constraints. Our work provides a better understanding of spared and impaired EFs, which could be useful for designing strategies aimed at improving specific EFs in each group.
通过多项神经心理学任务评估,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和精神分裂谱系障碍(SSDs)个体在执行功能(EF)方面存在相似的损伤。使用 Miyake 和 Friedman(Cogn Psychol 41(1):49-100, 2000)的三成分 EF 框架来检查这两种情况的神经心理学特征。该方法使用九种不同的任务评估抑制(抑制不想要的和不相关的信息/反应)、更新(工作记忆内容的使用和控制)和转换(活动或心理任务之间的分离)。根据之前的研究,我们预计 ASD 在所有三个成分中的表现缺陷都比 SSD 更大,并且 SSD 组的反应更快。自定步速任务格式使我们能够检查是否为任务提供无限时间会导致更好的表现。该样本由对照组(N=25)、ASD 组(N=24)和 SSD 组(N=12)组成。各组在抑制性能上没有差异。在更新中,SSD 患者的表现不如其他组。至于转换,两组的表现均不如对照组,而 SSD 组的困难最大。在反应时间(RT)方面,SSD 参与者在抑制和转换任务中的 RT 最慢。只有 SSD 组的表现与抑制和转换任务的时间之间存在正相关,这表明当没有时间限制时,他们的表现会提高。我们的工作提供了对保留和受损 EF 的更好理解,这对于设计旨在提高每组特定 EF 的策略可能很有用。