Formanek Veronica L, Spector Barak M, Zappitelli Gabriela, Wu Zhenxing, Zhao Kai
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
BMC Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03999-y.
Eyeglasses, hearing aids, etc., all serve to enhance the sensory stimuli to enable patients to see or hear things that they would not otherwise be able to, but we have no equivalent technology for olfaction, a pressing issue in the post-COVID era.
We attempt to invent "Smell-Aids" by non-invasively enhancing intranasal odorant delivery to the olfactory epithelium, using two prototypes: (a) a nasal foam plug with a diagonal channel embedded to direct air/odor flow upwards to the olfactory region; (b) a clip (similar to what synchronized swimmers use) pinching a critical nasal valve region that may intensify the nasal airflow vortex to the olfactory region.
We first tested these prototypes in counter-balanced orders on 58 healthy subjects, where their measured odor detection thresholds to phenylethyl alcohol significantly improved with both prototypes in subjects with normal smell function (baseline: 8-16.5, n = 30, 12.49 ± 2.8, plug: 14.42 ± 4.9, pinch: 14.73 ± 5.4, p < 0.05), but not in subjects with "super" sensitivity at baseline (> 16.5, n = 28). Next, we tested the prototypes on 54 patients with confirmed olfactory losses (age 21-80 years, median 54.5), the majority of whom (37/54 = 69%) were post-COVID long haulers (infected 12/15/2019 to 10/4/23; persisted 30 to 1260 days, median 22 months). The remaining non-COVID smell losses (n = 17) span significantly longer from 5 months to 27 years (median 8.5 years). The 9-item NIH toolbox odor identification score significantly improved after application of both smell aids (baseline: 4.30 ± 2.27, plug 5.11 ± 2.32, pinch 4.82 ± 2.06, mixed model p < 0.05), especially among the non-COVID cohort. For COVID long haulers, only the nasal plug remained effective (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis was performed on patients who reported diminished (hyposmia/anosmia 38/54) vs distorted smell (parosmia/phantosmia 27/54, n = 11 reported both) and showed that the nasal plug remains effective for both cohorts (p < 0.05) while the pinch is only effective for the hypo/anosmia cohort (p < 0.05).
These results preliminarily demonstrated the novelty of improving olfactory function through different peripheral mechanisms for different patient and normative cohorts and may one day lead to an effective over-the-counter smell aid. Enhancing olfactory functions in healthy and patient cohorts through improving intranasal air and odorant delivery.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05920330.
眼镜、助听器等都有助于增强感官刺激,使患者能够看到或听到他们原本无法看到或听到的东西,但在嗅觉方面我们却没有类似的技术,这在新冠疫情后的时代是一个紧迫的问题。
我们试图通过非侵入性地增强鼻腔内气味剂向嗅上皮的输送来发明“嗅觉辅助器”,使用了两个原型:(a)一种带有对角通道的鼻腔泡沫塞,该通道可引导空气/气味向上流向嗅觉区域;(b)一种夹子(类似于花样游泳运动员使用的那种),夹住一个关键的鼻瓣区域,这可能会增强流向嗅觉区域的鼻腔气流漩涡。
我们首先以平衡顺序在58名健康受试者身上测试了这些原型,在嗅觉功能正常的受试者中(基线:8 - 16.5,n = 30,12.49 ± 2.8,使用泡沫塞后:14.42 ± 4.9,使用夹子后:14.73 ± 5.4,p < 0.05),两种原型都显著提高了他们对苯乙醇的气味检测阈值,但在基线时具有“超”敏感性的受试者中(> 16.5,n = 28)则没有。接下来,我们在54名确诊嗅觉丧失的患者身上测试了这些原型(年龄21 - 80岁,中位数54.5岁),其中大多数(37/54 = 69%)是新冠长期患者(感染时间为2019年12月15日至2023年10月4日;持续时间为30至1260天,中位数22个月)。其余非新冠导致的嗅觉丧失(n = 17)持续时间从5个月到27年不等(中位数8.5年)。使用两种嗅觉辅助器后,9项美国国立卫生研究院工具箱气味识别评分显著提高(基线:4.30 ± 2.27,使用泡沫塞后:5.11 ± 2.32,使用夹子后:4.82 ± 2.06,混合模型p < 0.05),尤其是在非新冠患者组中。对于新冠长期患者,只有鼻腔泡沫塞仍然有效(p < 0.05)。对报告嗅觉减退(嗅觉减退/嗅觉丧失38/54)与嗅觉扭曲(嗅觉异常/嗅觉幻觉27/54,11名患者同时报告了两者)的患者进行亚组分析,结果显示鼻腔泡沫塞对两组患者均有效(p < 0.05),而夹子仅对嗅觉减退/嗅觉丧失组有效(p < 0.05)。
这些结果初步证明了通过针对不同患者和正常人群的不同外周机制来改善嗅觉功能的新颖性,并且可能有一天会带来一种有效的非处方嗅觉辅助器。通过改善鼻腔内空气和气味剂的输送来增强健康人群和患者群体的嗅觉功能。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05920330