Razieh Cameron, Zaccardi Francesco, Miksza Joanne, Davies Melanie J, Hansell Anna L, Khunti Kamlesh, Yates Thomas
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Leicester and University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Office for National Statistics, Newport, NP10 8XG, UK.
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK; Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Nov;32(11):2594-2602. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
To describe sociodemographic, lifestyle, environmental and traditional clinical risk factor differences between ethnic groups and to investigate the extent to which such differences confound the association between ethnic groups and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 440,693 white European (55.9% women), 7305 South Asian (48.6%) and 7628 black African or Caribbean (57.7%) people were included from UK Biobank. Associations between ethnicity and cardiovascular outcomes (composite of non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction and CVD death) were explored using Cox-proportional hazard models. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, environmental and clinical risk factors. Over a median (IQR) of 12.6 (11.8, 13.3) follow-up years, there were 22,711 (5.15%) cardiovascular events in white European, 463 (6.34%) in South Asian and 302 (3.96%) in black African or Caribbean individuals. For South Asian people, the cardiovascular hazard ratio (HR) compared to white European people was 1.28 (99% CI [1.16, 1.43]). For black African or Caribbean people, the HR was 0.80 (0.66, 0.97). The elevated risk of CVD in South Asians remained after adjusting for differences in sociodemographic, lifestyle, environmental and clinical factors, whereas the lower risk in black African or Caribbean was largely attenuated.
South Asian, but not black African or Caribbean individuals, have a higher risk of CVD compared to white European individuals. This higher risk in South Asians was independent of sociodemographic, lifestyle, environmental and clinical factors.
描述不同种族群体在社会人口统计学、生活方式、环境及传统临床风险因素方面的差异,并调查这些差异在多大程度上混淆了种族群体与心血管疾病(CVD)风险之间的关联。方法与结果:从英国生物银行纳入了共计440,693名欧洲白人(女性占55.9%)、7305名南亚人(48.6%)和7628名非洲裔或加勒比黑人(57.7%)。使用Cox比例风险模型探讨种族与心血管结局(非致死性中风、非致死性心肌梗死和CVD死亡的综合指标)之间的关联。模型针对社会人口统计学、生活方式、环境及临床风险因素进行了调整。在中位(四分位间距)12.6(11.8,13.3)年的随访期内,欧洲白人中有22,711例(5.15%)发生心血管事件,南亚人中有463例(6.34%),非洲裔或加勒比黑人中有302例(3.96%)。与欧洲白人相比,南亚人的心血管风险比(HR)为1.28(99%可信区间[1.16, 1.43])。非洲裔或加勒比黑人的HR为0.80(0.66, 0.97)。在调整社会人口统计学、生活方式、环境及临床因素的差异后,南亚人CVD风险升高的情况仍然存在,而非洲裔或加勒比黑人较低的风险在很大程度上被减弱。结论:与欧洲白人相比,南亚人而非非洲裔或加勒比黑人患CVD的风险更高。南亚人的这种较高风险独立于社会人口统计学、生活方式、环境及临床因素。