Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Nov;37(11):2121-2131. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4697. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)-American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)-Study to Advance Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as a Regulatory Endpoint (SABRE) cohort, which includes individual patient data from randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies. In this study we included 96,385 subjects, 6.8% of whom had T2D, from nine bisphosphonate trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) trials, two trials of menopausal hormone therapy, one denosumab trial, and one odanacatib trial. We used Cox regression to obtain the treatment hazard ratio (HR) for incident nonvertebral, hip, and all fractures and logistic regression to obtain the treatment odds ratio (OR) for incident morphometric vertebral fractures, separately for T2D and non-DM. We used linear regression to estimate the effect of treatment on 2-year change in BMD (n = 49,099) and 3-month to 12-month change in bone turnover markers (n = 12,701) by diabetes status. In all analyses, we assessed the interaction between treatment and diabetes status. In pooled analyses of all 15 trials, we found that diabetes did not impact treatment efficacy, with similar reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, all, and hip fractures, increases in total hip and femoral neck BMD, and reductions in serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide (CTX), urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (NTX/Cr) and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) (all interactions p > 0.05). We found similar results for the pooled analysis of bisphosphonate trials. However, when we considered trials individually, we found a few interactions within individual studies between diabetes status and the effects of denosumab and odanacatib on fracture risk, change in BMD or bone turnover markers (BTMs). In sum, these results provide strong evidence that bisphosphonates and most licensed antiresorptive drugs are effective at reducing fracture risk and increasing BMD irrespective of diabetes status. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
2 型糖尿病(T2D)与骨折风险增加相关。然而,目前尚不清楚骨质疏松症的治疗是否能降低糖尿病患者的骨折风险。本研究旨在通过使用美国国立卫生研究院基金会(FNIH)-美国骨与矿物研究协会(ASBMR)-推进骨密度(BMD)研究作为监管终点(SABRE)队列来确定 T2D 是否影响抗吸收骨质疏松症治疗的疗效,该队列包括骨质疏松症治疗随机试验的个体患者数据。在这项研究中,我们纳入了来自 9 项双磷酸盐试验、2 项选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM)试验、2 项绝经激素治疗试验、1 项地舒单抗试验和 1 项odanacatib 试验的 96385 名受试者,其中 6.8%患有 T2D。我们使用 Cox 回归获得了非椎体、髋部和所有骨折的发生率治疗风险比(HR),并使用逻辑回归获得了发生率形态计量椎体骨折的治疗比值比(OR),分别针对 T2D 和非 DM。我们使用线性回归根据糖尿病状态估计治疗对 2 年 BMD 变化(n=49099)和 3 个月至 12 个月骨转换标志物变化(n=12701)的影响。在所有分析中,我们都评估了治疗与糖尿病状态之间的相互作用。在所有 15 项试验的汇总分析中,我们发现糖尿病并未影响治疗效果,椎体、非椎体、所有和髋部骨折的减少、全髋和股骨颈 BMD 的增加以及血清 C 端交联肽(CTX)、尿 I 型胶原 N 端肽/肌酐(NTX/Cr)和前胶原 1 N 端前肽(P1NP)的减少相似(所有交互作用 p>0.05)。我们对双磷酸盐试验的汇总分析也得到了类似的结果。然而,当我们单独考虑试验时,我们发现 denosumab 和 odanacatib 对骨折风险、BMD 或骨转换标志物(BTMs)变化的影响在个别研究中存在一些糖尿病状态与药物之间的相互作用。总之,这些结果提供了强有力的证据,表明双磷酸盐和大多数已批准的抗吸收药物可有效降低骨折风险并增加 BMD,而与糖尿病状态无关。