Hachem Laureen D, Zhu Mary, Aarabi Bizhan, Davies Benjamin, DiGiorgio Anthony, Evaniew Nathan, Fehlings Michael G, Ganau Mario, Graves Daniel, Guest James, Ha Yoon, Harrop James, Hofstetter Christopher, Koljonen Paul, Kurpad Shekar, Marco Rex, Martin Allan R, Nagoshi Narihito, Nouri Aria, Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa, Rodrigues-Pinto Ricardo, Wengel Valerie Ter, Tetreault Lindsay, Kwon Brian, Wilson Jefferson R
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(2):535-545. doi: 10.1177/21925682221114800. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
A modified Delphi study.
To assess current practice patterns in the management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and develop a simplified, practical classification system which offers ease of use in the acute setting, incorporates modern diagnostic tools and provides utility in determining treatment strategies for cervical SCI.
A three-phase modified Delphi procedure was performed between April 2020 and December 2021. During the first phase, members of the AOSpine SCI Knowledge forum proposed variables of importance for classifying and treating cervical SCI. The second phase involved an international survey of spine surgeons gauging practices surrounding the role and timing of surgery for cervical SCI and opinions regarding factors which most influence these practices. For the third phase, information obtained from phases 1 and 2 were used to draft a new classification system.
396 surgeons responded to the survey. Neurological status, spinal stability and cord compression were the most important variables influencing decisions surrounding the role and timing of surgery. The majority (>50%) of respondents preferred to perform surgery within 24 hours post-SCI in clinical scenarios in which there was instability, severe cord compression or severe neurology. Situations in which <50% of respondents were inclined to operate early included: SCI with mild neurological impairments, with cord compression but without instability (with or without medical comorbidities), and SCI without cord compression or instability.
Spinal stability, cord compression and neurological status are the most important variables influencing surgeons' practices surrounding the surgical management of cervical SCI. Based on these results, a simplified classification system for acute cervical SCI has been proposed.
一项改良的德尔菲研究。
评估颈椎脊髓损伤(SCI)管理中的当前实践模式,并开发一种简化、实用的分类系统,该系统在急性情况下易于使用,纳入现代诊断工具,并在确定颈椎SCI的治疗策略方面具有实用性。
在2020年4月至2021年12月期间进行了一个分为三个阶段的改良德尔菲程序。在第一阶段,AOSpine SCI知识论坛的成员提出了对颈椎SCI进行分类和治疗的重要变量。第二阶段涉及对脊柱外科医生的国际调查,以评估围绕颈椎SCI手术的作用和时机的实践以及对最影响这些实践的因素的看法。在第三阶段,使用从第一阶段和第二阶段获得的信息来起草一个新的分类系统。
396名外科医生回复了调查。神经状态、脊柱稳定性和脊髓压迫是影响手术作用和时机决策的最重要变量。在存在不稳定、严重脊髓压迫或严重神经功能障碍的临床情况下,大多数(>50%)受访者倾向于在SCI后24小时内进行手术。受访者中不到50%倾向于早期手术的情况包括:伴有轻度神经功能障碍的SCI、伴有脊髓压迫但无不稳定(有或无内科合并症)的SCI,以及无脊髓压迫或不稳定的SCI。
脊柱稳定性、脊髓压迫和神经状态是影响外科医生颈椎SCI手术管理实践的最重要变量。基于这些结果,提出了一种急性颈椎SCI的简化分类系统。