• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COMPASS II-Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol 旨在为全科医生实践和社区护理点之间的合作进行可行性研究的合作协议。

COMPASS II-Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol for a feasibility study of cooperation between general practitioner practices and community care points.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0273212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273212. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273212
PMID:36067167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9447866/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

General practitioners (GP) increasingly face the challenge of meeting the complex care needs of multi-morbid patients. Previous studies show that GP practices would like support from other institutions in advising on social aspects of care for multi-morbid patients. Already existing counselling services, like community care points, are not sufficiently known by both GPs and patients. The aim of COMPASS II is to investigate the feasibility of cooperation between GP practices and community care points.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

During the intervention, GPs send eligible multi-morbid patients with social care needs to a community care point. The community care points report the consultation results back to the GPs. In preparation for the intervention, in a moderated process, GP practices meet with the community care points to agree on information exchange. The primary outcome is the feasibility of the cooperation: Questionnaires will be sent to GPs, medical practice assistances and community care point personnel (focus: practicality, acceptability). Data will be collected on frequency and reasons for GP-initiated consultations at community care points (focus: demand). Qualitative interviews will be conducted with all participating groups (focus: acceptability, satisfaction). The secondary outcome is the assessment of changes in health-related quality of life, social support and satisfaction with care: participating patients complete a questionnaire before and three to six months after their counselling. The results of the study will be incorporated into a manual in which the experiences of the cooperation will be made available to other GP practices and community care points.

DISCUSSION

In COMPASS II, GP practices establish cooperation with community care points. The latter are already existing institutions that provide independent and free advice on social matters. By using an existing institution, the established cooperation and experiences from the study can be used beyond the end of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with DRKS-ID: DRKS00023798, Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support II.

摘要

简介

全科医生(GP)越来越面临满足多病共存患者复杂护理需求的挑战。先前的研究表明,GP 实践希望在多病共存患者的社会护理方面得到其他机构的支持。已经存在的咨询服务,如社区护理点,GP 和患者都知之甚少。COMPASS II 的目的是调查 GP 实践与社区护理点之间合作的可行性。

方法与分析

在干预过程中,GP 将有社会护理需求的符合条件的多病共存患者转介到社区护理点。社区护理点将咨询结果报告给 GP。在干预之前,GP 实践与社区护理点进行了 moderator 过程,就信息交流达成一致。主要结果是合作的可行性:将向 GP、医疗实践助理和社区护理点人员发送问卷(重点:实用性、可接受性)。将收集关于 GP 主动到社区护理点咨询的频率和原因的数据(重点:需求)。将对所有参与群体进行定性访谈(重点:可接受性、满意度)。次要结果是评估与健康相关的生活质量、社会支持和护理满意度的变化:参与患者在咨询前和咨询后 3 至 6 个月完成问卷。研究结果将纳入手册中,供其他 GP 实践和社区护理点使用。

讨论

在 COMPASS II 中,GP 实践与社区护理点建立合作关系。后者是提供独立和免费社会问题咨询的现有机构。通过利用现有机构,合作的建立和研究经验可以在研究结束后继续使用。

试验注册

该试验在 DRKS-ID 注册:协调医学专业以实现可持续支持 II。

相似文献

1
COMPASS II-Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol for a feasibility study of cooperation between general practitioner practices and community care points.COMPASS II-Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol 旨在为全科医生实践和社区护理点之间的合作进行可行性研究的合作协议。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0273212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273212. eCollection 2022.
2
[General practices and community care points work hand in hand in the care of multimorbid patients: What are the advantages? - A qualitative study with general practitioners and medical practice assistants].[全科医疗与社区护理点在多病共存患者护理中携手合作:有哪些优势?——一项针对全科医生和医疗实践助理的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Dec;182-183:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
3
[Referrals from general practice to community care points. What are the patients' experiences? An interview study].[从全科医疗转诊至社区护理点。患者有哪些体验?一项访谈研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Sep;181:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.早期恐惧减轻运动(FREE)治疗腰痛方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8.
5
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
6
Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices.全科医疗中面对面咨询的在线替代方案的可行性、可接受性和有效性:对德文郡六个诊所的网络全科医疗(WebGP)的混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 15;8(2):e018688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018688.
7
The PULSAR primary care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to test a training intervention for general practitioners in recovery-oriented practice to optimize personal recovery in adult patients.脉冲星初级保健方案:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验,旨在测试针对全科医生的以康复为导向的实践培训干预措施,以优化成年患者的个人康复。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 20;16(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1153-6.
8
[Non-medical aspects in the care for multimorbid patients in general practice. What kind of support and cooperation is desired? Focus groups with general practitioners in Berlin].[全科医疗中多病共存患者护理的非医学方面。需要何种支持与合作?与柏林全科医生进行的焦点小组访谈]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Dec;158-159:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Changes to utilization and provision of health care in German GP practices during the COVID 19-pandemic: Protocol for a mixed methods study on the viewpoint of GPs, medical practice assistants, and patients.德国全科医生诊所中 COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健的利用和提供的变化:基于全科医生、医疗助理和患者观点的混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0279413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279413. eCollection 2023.
10
Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit-stand desks: a feasibility trial.全科医生使用坐站两用办公桌的可行性和可接受性:一项可行性试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 23;14(6):e084085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084085.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Care Points-Awareness Levels and Utilization.社区护理点——认知水平与利用情况
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Feb 16;119(50):876-877. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0343.

本文引用的文献

1
Global developments in social prescribing.社会处方的全球发展。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008524.
2
The impact of COVID-19 on primary care in Europe.新冠疫情对欧洲初级医疗保健的影响。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jul;6:100152. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100152. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
The role of social prescribers in wales: a consensus methods study.威尔士社会开处方者的角色:一项共识方法研究。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 Sep;142(5):297-304. doi: 10.1177/1757913921990072. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
The implementation cost of a safety-net hospital program addressing social needs in Atlanta.解决亚特兰大社会需求的安全网医院计划的实施成本。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):474-485. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13629. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Link worker perspectives of early implementation of social prescribing: A 'Researcher-in-Residence' study.社会处方早期实施的联络员视角:一项“驻场研究员”研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1844-1851. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13295. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
[Non-medical aspects in the care for multimorbid patients in general practice. What kind of support and cooperation is desired? Focus groups with general practitioners in Berlin].[全科医疗中多病共存患者护理的非医学方面。需要何种支持与合作?与柏林全科医生进行的焦点小组访谈]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Dec;158-159:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
[Support for General Practitioners in the Care of Patients with Complex Needs: A Questionnaire Survey of General Practitioners in Berlin].[为全科医生提供照顾复杂需求患者的支持:对柏林全科医生的问卷调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Oct;83(10):844-853. doi: 10.1055/a-1173-9225. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
Coordination of care for multimorbid patients from the perspective of general practitioners - a qualitative study.全科医生视角下的多病共存患者的协同护理 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 20;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1048-y.
9
The general practice perspective on barriers to integration between primary and social care: a London, United Kingdom-based qualitative interview study.从全科医生的角度看初级保健和社会保健整合的障碍:基于英国伦敦的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e029702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029702.
10
GP retention in the UK: a worsening crisis. Findings from a cross-sectional survey.英国全科医生的保留问题:日益恶化的危机。一项横断面调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 27;9(2):e026048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026048.