• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从全科医生的角度看初级保健和社会保健整合的障碍:基于英国伦敦的定性访谈研究。

The general practice perspective on barriers to integration between primary and social care: a London, United Kingdom-based qualitative interview study.

机构信息

Imperial College London, London, UK

Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e029702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029702.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029702
PMID:31434776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707672/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is an ongoing challenge of effective integration between primary and social care in the United Kingdom; current systems have led to fragmentation of services preventing holistic patient-centred care for vulnerable populations. To improve clinical outcomes and achieve financial efficiencies, the barriers to integration need to be identified and addressed. This study aims to explore the unique perspectives of frontline staff (general practitioners and practice managers) towards these barriers to integration.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and thematic analysis to obtain results.

SETTING

General practices within London.

PARTICIPANTS

18 general practitioners (GPs) and 7 practice managers (PMs) based in London with experience of working with social care.

RESULTS

The study identified three overarching themes where frontline staff believed problems exist: accessing social services, interprofessional relationships and infrastructure. Issues with contacting staff from other sectors creates delays in referrals for patient care and perpetuates existing logistical challenges. Likewise, professionals noted a hostile working culture between sectors that has resulted in silo working mentalities. In addition to staff being overworked as well as often inefficient multidisciplinary team meetings, poor relationships across sectors cause a diffusion of responsibility, impacting the speed with which patient requests are responded to. Furthermore, participants identified that a lack of interoperability between information systems, lack of pooled budgets and misaligned incentives between managerial staff compound the infrastructural divide between both sectors.

CONCLUSION

In this study, primary care staff identify intangible barriers to integration such as poor interprofessional relationships, in addition to more well-described structural issues such as insufficient funding and difficulty accessing social care. Participants believe that educating the next generation of medical professionals may lead to the development of collaborative, instead of siloed, working cultures and that change is needed at both an interpersonal and institutional level to successfully integrate care.

摘要

目的

英国初级保健和社会保健之间的有效整合一直面临挑战;当前的系统导致服务碎片化,无法为弱势人群提供整体以患者为中心的护理。为了改善临床结果并实现财务效率,需要确定并解决整合的障碍。本研究旨在探讨一线工作人员(全科医生和诊所经理)对这些整合障碍的独特看法。

设计

使用半结构化访谈和主题分析的定性研究,以获取结果。

地点

伦敦的全科诊所。

参与者

18 名全科医生(GP)和 7 名来自伦敦的诊所经理(PM),他们有与社会保健合作的经验。

结果

该研究确定了一线工作人员认为存在问题的三个总体主题:获取社会服务、专业间关系和基础设施。与其他部门的员工联系存在问题会导致患者护理转介延迟,并使现有后勤挑战持续存在。同样,专业人员指出,部门之间存在敌对的工作文化,导致孤立工作的心态。除了员工工作过度以及多学科团队会议效率低下外,部门之间关系不佳还导致责任扩散,影响患者请求的响应速度。此外,参与者还发现,信息系统之间缺乏互操作性、缺乏联合预算以及管理层之间激励措施不一致,加剧了两个部门之间的基础设施鸿沟。

结论

在这项研究中,初级保健工作人员除了更详细描述的结构问题(如资金不足和难以获得社会关怀)外,还确定了整合的无形障碍,如专业间关系不佳。参与者认为,教育下一代医疗专业人员可能会导致建立协作而不是孤立的工作文化,并且需要在人际和机构层面进行变革,以成功整合护理。

相似文献

1
The general practice perspective on barriers to integration between primary and social care: a London, United Kingdom-based qualitative interview study.从全科医生的角度看初级保健和社会保健整合的障碍:基于英国伦敦的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e029702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029702.
2
3
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
4
More that unites us than divides us? A qualitative study of integration of community health and social care services.将社区卫生和社会保健服务整合起来的因素多于将其分开的因素?一项关于整合社区卫生和社会保健服务的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 29;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01168-z.
5
Integration of pharmacists into general practice clinics in Australia: the views of general practitioners and pharmacists.澳大利亚药剂师融入全科诊所:全科医生和药剂师的观点。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Feb;22(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12047. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Is primary care ready to embrace e-health? A qualitative study of staff in a London primary care trust.初级保健机构准备好接纳电子健康了吗?一项针对伦敦一家初级保健信托机构员工的定性研究。
Inform Prim Care. 2006;14(2):121-31. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v14i2.622.
7
The neglected role of distress in pain management: qualitative research on a gastrointestinal ward.痛苦在疼痛管理中被忽视的作用:对一个胃肠病病房的定性研究
Scand J Pain. 2018 Jul 26;18(3):399-407. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0045.
8
Evaluation of welfare advice in primary care: effect on practice workload and prescribing for mental health.初级保健中福利建议的评估:对实践工作量和心理健康处方的影响。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2013 Jul;14(3):307-14. doi: 10.1017/S1463423612000461. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Coordination of services for people with serious mental illness and general medical conditions: Perspectives from rural northeastern United States.严重精神疾病患者和一般医疗条件患者的服务协调:美国东北地区农村的观点。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Sep;43(3):234-243. doi: 10.1037/prj0000404. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of Covid-19 on inter-organizational coordination in Swedish eldercare: a mixed methods study.新冠疫情对瑞典老年护理中组织间协调的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12576-1.
2
Seeking Optimal, Integrated Pediatric Medical and Social Care: A Qualitative, Peer Researcher-Driven Study.寻求最佳的综合儿科医疗和社会护理:一项由同行研究者主导的定性研究
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Jul;25(5):102816. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2025.102816. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
General practitioners' barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration on pregnant women with vulnerabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Danish general practice.全科医生在与弱势孕妇开展跨部门合作方面的障碍:丹麦全科医疗的横断面调查
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):292-302. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2432371. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
4
"To tell you the truth I'm tired": a qualitative exploration of the experiences of ethnically diverse NHS staff.“说实话,我累了”:对不同族裔 NHS 员工的经历进行的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 9;14(1):e070510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070510.
5
UK general practice service delivery research priorities: an adapted James Lind Alliance approach.英国全科医疗服务提供研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟方法的改编版。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec 28;74(738):e9-e16. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0226. Print 2024 Jan.
6
Collaboration between general practitioners and social workers: a scoping review.全科医生与社会工作者的合作:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 3;12(6):e062144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062144.
7
COMPASS II-Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol for a feasibility study of cooperation between general practitioner practices and community care points.COMPASS II-Coordination of Medical Professions Aiming at Sustainable Support Protocol 旨在为全科医生实践和社区护理点之间的合作进行可行性研究的合作协议。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0273212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273212. eCollection 2022.
8
Interprofessional collaboration to support patients with social problems in general practice-a qualitative focus group study.跨专业合作以支持基层医疗中存在社会问题的患者:一项定性焦点小组研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 4;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01782-z.
9
Identifying and understanding the factors that influence the functioning of integrated healthcare systems in the NHS: a systematic literature review.识别和理解影响国民保健制度中综合医疗保健系统运作的因素:系统文献回顾。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 5;12(4):e049296. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049296.
10
"They created a team of almost entirely the people who work and are like them": A qualitative study of organisational culture and racialised inequalities among healthcare staff.他们创建了一个几乎完全由与他们工作方式和风格相似的人组成的团队:一项关于组织文化和医疗保健人员中种族不平等现象的定性研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Feb;44(2):267-289. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13414. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review.跨组织环境下医疗整合的障碍:文献综述
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3068.
2
Crossing the Cultural and Value Divide Between Health and Social Care.跨越健康与社会护理之间的文化和价值鸿沟。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 28;16(4):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2534.
3
Understanding Integrated Care.理解综合医疗服务
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 28;16(4):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2530.
4
PRISMA: Program of Research to Integrate the Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy. A system-level integration model in Quebec.PRISMA:维持自主性服务整合研究项目。魁北克的一种系统层面整合模式。
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Sep 23;15:e018. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2246. eCollection 2015 Apr-Jun.
5
Achieving community oriented integrated care through the 2014 England GP contract.通过2014年英格兰全科医生合同实现以社区为导向的综合护理。
London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2014;6(3):55-64. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2014.11493416.
6
Integrating funds for health and social care: an evidence review.整合卫生与社会护理资金:证据综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jul;20(3):177-88. doi: 10.1177/1355819614566832. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
7
Integrated care pilot in north-west London: a mixed methods evaluation.西北伦敦综合护理试点:混合方法评估。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Jul 25;13:e027. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1149. eCollection 2013.
8
Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots.整合照护的障碍与促进因素:来自英国综合照护试点的经验。
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Jul 24;12:e129. doi: 10.5334/ijic.982. Print 2012 Jul-Sep.
9
Fragmentation: a wicked problem with an integrated solution?碎片化:一个棘手的问题,却有一个综合的解决方案?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Jan;18(1):61-4. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012002.
10
The need for systems integration in health care.医疗保健中系统集成的必要性。
JAMA. 2011 Mar 2;305(9):934-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.237.