Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Dec;31(12):e613-e619. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.018. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND: Female representation in orthopedics, and specifically shoulder and elbow surgery, lags behind other surgical subspecialities. There has been a growing interest in recent years to better characterize, and address, gender disparities in the field. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize gender trends in authorship in the shoulder and elbow literature from 2002 to 2020.
Articles published from January 2002 to December 2020 in 15 clinical orthopedic and shoulder- and elbow-specific journals were extracted from the online PubMed database. Articles that included the first name of the first and senior authors and contained keywords related to the shoulder and elbow subspecialty were included. The Genderize algorithm was used to determine each author's gender. Gender-based publication trends from 2002 to 2020 were analyzed using descriptive and significance testing as well as logistic regression.
34,695 articles met inclusion criteria and 52,497 unique authors were identified. Of these unique authors, 10,175 (19.4%) were female and 42,322 (80.6%) were male. On average, each unique female author published 1.7 ± 0.1 manuscripts since 2002 and each male author published 2.5 ± 0.2 (P < .001). Female representation in shoulder and elbow publications began at 10.2% in 2002 and rose to 15.9% in 2020 (P < .001). Female representation in the lead author position began at 4.1% in 2002 and rose to 5.8% in 2020 (P = .009). Female representation in the senior author position began at 6.0% in 2002 and rose to 9.1% in 2020 (P < .001).
Although female representation in first, senior, and general authorship lags behind male representation in the shoulder and elbow literature, female authorship has significantly increased since 2002. The same men tend to publish more frequently while the number of unique female authors surpasses the annual representation of female authorship. Efforts to improve female representation in the field of orthopedic surgery should include efforts directed at improving female representation in academic literature.
假设/背景:女性在骨科领域的代表性,特别是在肩肘外科领域,落后于其他外科专业。近年来,人们越来越有兴趣更好地描述和解决该领域的性别差距。本研究的目的是描述 2002 年至 2020 年肩肘文献中作者的性别趋势。
从在线 PubMed 数据库中提取了 2002 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月 15 种临床骨科和肩肘特定期刊上发表的文章。纳入了包含第一作者和资深作者的名字且包含肩肘亚专科相关关键字的文章。使用 Genderize 算法确定每位作者的性别。使用描述性和显著性检验以及逻辑回归分析 2002 年至 2020 年的性别发表趋势。
符合纳入标准的文章有 34695 篇,共确定了 52497 位独特作者。在这些独特的作者中,有 10175 位(19.4%)是女性,42322 位(80.6%)是男性。平均而言,自 2002 年以来,每位独特的女性作者发表了 1.7±0.1 篇文章,而每位男性作者发表了 2.5±0.2 篇(P<0.001)。2002 年,肩肘出版物中女性的代表性为 10.2%,2020 年上升至 15.9%(P<0.001)。2002 年,第一作者职位的女性代表比例为 4.1%,2020 年上升至 5.8%(P=0.009)。2002 年,资深作者职位的女性代表比例为 6.0%,2020 年上升至 9.1%(P<0.001)。
尽管女性在肩肘文献中的第一、资深和一般作者的代表性落后于男性,但自 2002 年以来,女性作者的比例显著增加。同样的男性往往发表的频率更高,而独特的女性作者的数量超过了女性作者年度代表性的数量。改善骨科领域女性代表性的努力应包括努力改善学术文献中的女性代表性。