• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伪影对压力反应指数的影响。

Effect of artifacts upon the pressure reactivity index.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Intensive Care Medicine, Masaryk Hospital in Usti nad Labem, Faculty of Health Studies, J. E. Purkinje University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 6;12(1):15131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19101-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-19101-y
PMID:36068281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9448724/
Abstract

The pressure reactivity index (PRx) is a parameter for the assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation, but its calculation is affected by artifacts in the source biosignals-intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial blood pressure. We sought to describe the most common short-duration artifacts and their effect on the PRx. A retrospective analysis of 935 h of multimodal monitoring data was conducted, and five types of artifacts, characterized by their shape, duration, and amplitude, were identified: rectangular, fast impulse, isoline drift, saw tooth, and constant ICP value. Subsequently, all types of artifacts were mathematically modeled and inserted into undisturbed segments of biosignals. Fast impulse, the most common artifact, did not alter the PRx index significantly when inserted into one or both signals. Artifacts present in one signal exceeded the threshold PRx in less than 5% of samples, except for isoline drift. Compared to that, the shortest rectangular artifact inserted into both signals changed PRx to a value above the set threshold in 55.4% of cases. Our analysis shows that the effect of individual artifacts on the PRx index is variable, depending on their occurrence in one or both signals, duration, and shape. This different effect suggests that potentially not all artifacts need to be removed.

摘要

压力反应指数(PRx)是评估脑血管自动调节的一个参数,但它的计算受到源生物信号(颅内压 [ICP] 和动脉血压)中的伪影的影响。我们旨在描述最常见的短持续时间伪影及其对 PRx 的影响。对 935 小时的多模式监测数据进行了回顾性分析,并确定了五种类型的伪影,其特征为形状、持续时间和幅度:矩形、快速脉冲、等线漂移、锯齿形和恒定的 ICP 值。随后,对所有类型的伪影进行了数学建模,并将其插入到生物信号的未受干扰的部分。快速脉冲是最常见的伪影,当插入一个或两个信号时,不会显著改变 PRx 指数。除等线漂移外,一个信号中存在的伪影在不到 5%的样本中超过 PRx 指数的阈值。相比之下,插入两个信号的最短矩形伪影在 55.4%的情况下将 PRx 改变为设定阈值以上的值。我们的分析表明,单个伪影对 PRx 指数的影响是可变的,取决于它们在一个或两个信号中的出现、持续时间和形状。这种不同的影响表明,可能并非所有的伪影都需要去除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/9b6a700b882f/41598_2022_19101_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/dbbccfb9d0b9/41598_2022_19101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/eced53db0f65/41598_2022_19101_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/9b6a700b882f/41598_2022_19101_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/dbbccfb9d0b9/41598_2022_19101_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/eced53db0f65/41598_2022_19101_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6db/9448724/9b6a700b882f/41598_2022_19101_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of artifacts upon the pressure reactivity index.伪影对压力反应指数的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 6;12(1):15131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19101-y.
2
Statistical Signal Properties of the Pressure-Reactivity Index (PRx).压力反应性指数(PRx)的统计信号特性
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:317-320. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_62.
3
Outcome, Pressure Reactivity and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Calculation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison of Two Variants.创伤性脑损伤的结果、压力反应性与最佳脑灌注压计算:两种变体的比较
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:221-3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_44.
4
Validation of Intracranial Pressure-Derived Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices against the Lower Limit of Autoregulation, Part II: Experimental Model of Arterial Hypotension.颅内压衍生脑血管反应性指数对自动调节下限的验证,第二部分:动脉低血压的实验模型。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Dec 1;35(23):2812-2819. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5604. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
5
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
'Long' pressure reactivity index (L-PRx) as a measure of autoregulation correlates with outcome in traumatic brain injury patients.'长时'压力反应指数(L-PRx)作为自动调节的测量指标与创伤性脑损伤患者的预后相关。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Sep;154(9):1575-81. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1423-0. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Effects of Brain Temperature on Cerebrovascular Autoregulation During the Acute Stage of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.脑温对重度创伤性脑损伤急性期脑血管自动调节的影响
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:193-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_39.
8
Impaired cerebrovascular reactivity after acute traumatic brain injury can be detected by wavelet phase coherence analysis of the intracranial and arterial blood pressure signals.急性创伤性脑损伤后脑血管反应性受损可以通过颅内和动脉血压信号的小波相位相干性分析来检测。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Aug;27(4):375-83. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9484-z. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
9
Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with head injury.对颅脑损伤患者脑血管压力反应性的持续监测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2008 Oct;25(4):E2. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.10.E2.
10
State of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Correlates with Outcome in Severe Infant/Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.脑血管自动调节状态与重度婴幼儿/儿童创伤性脑损伤的预后相关。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:239-44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_48.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalizing the Pressure Reactivity Index for Quantifying Cerebral Autoregulation in Neurocritical Care.个性化压力反应指数以量化神经重症监护中的脑自动调节功能
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2025 May 15;PP. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2025.3570249.
2
Eight rules for the haemodynamic management of traumatic brain-injured patients.创伤性脑损伤患者血流动力学管理的八条规则。
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023 Jun 22;2(4):e0029. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000029. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Artifact Management for Cerebral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
An Update on the COGiTATE Phase II Study: Feasibility and Safety of Targeting an Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure as a Patient-Tailored Therapy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.COGiTATE 二期研究更新:在严重创伤性脑损伤中靶向最佳脑灌注压作为患者定制治疗的可行性和安全性。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:143-147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_29.
2
Artifacts annotations in anesthesia blood pressure data by man and machine.人工和机器对麻醉血压数据中的伪影进行注释。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):259-267. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00574-z. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol.
脑近红外光谱信号的伪影管理:一项系统综述。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;11(9):933. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090933.
4
Cerebral autoregulation, spreading depolarization, and implications for targeted therapy in brain injury and ischemia.脑自动调节、扩散性去极化及其对脑损伤和缺血靶向治疗的意义。
Rev Neurosci. 2024 Apr 8;35(6):651-678. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2024-0028. Print 2024 Aug 27.
5
CPPopt on Medical Devices: The Imitation Game.医疗设备上的CPP优化:模仿游戏。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):330-331. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01977-5. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
Evaluation of Morlet Wavelet Analysis for Artifact Detection in Low-Frequency Commercial Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Systems.用于低频商用近红外光谱系统伪迹检测的Morlet小波分析评估
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;11(1):0. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11010033.
7
The pressure reactivity index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation and its application in traumatic brain injury management.作为脑自动调节指标的压力反应性指数及其在创伤性脑损伤管理中的应用。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 14;25(4):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.009. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Continuous monitoring of the lower limit of reactivity in traumatic brain injury patients: understanding what is feasible.创伤性脑损伤患者反应性下限的连续监测:了解可行之处。
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 11;27(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04773-3.
采用自动评估最佳脑灌注压方法对个体化严重创伤性脑损伤管理的可行性:COGiTATE 二期研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.
4
Artifact removal from neurophysiological signals: impact on intracranial and arterial pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury.从神经生理信号中去除伪迹:对创伤性脑损伤中颅内压和动脉压监测的影响
J Neurosurg. 2019 May 10;132(6):1952-1960. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.JNS182260. Print 2020 Jun 1.
5
Pressure reactivity index: journey through the past 20 years.压力反应性指数:过去20年的历程
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Nov;159(11):2063-2065. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3310-1. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
6
Calculation of cerebral perfusion pressure in the management of traumatic brain injury: joint position statement by the councils of the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland (NACCS) and the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS).创伤性脑损伤管理中脑灌注压的计算:英国和爱尔兰神经麻醉与重症监护学会(NACCS)及英国神经外科医生学会(SBNS)理事会联合立场声明
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Oct;115(4):487-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev233. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Management at Bedside: A Single-Center Pilot Study.床边最佳脑灌注压管理:一项单中心试点研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):92-102. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0103-8.
8
Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后脑血管反应性的临界阈值。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Apr;16(2):258-66. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9630-8.
9
Artificial arterial blood pressure artifact models and an evaluation of a robust blood pressure and heart rate estimator.人工动脉血压伪像模型及一种稳健的血压和心率估计器的评估。
Biomed Eng Online. 2009 Jul 8;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-13.
10
ICM+, a flexible platform for investigations of cerebrospinal dynamics in clinical practice.ICM+,一个用于临床实践中脑脊液动力学研究的灵活平台。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:145-51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-85578-2_30.