Suppr超能文献

电子听诊器远程听诊系统的真实世界评估。

Real-world evaluation of the Stemoscope electronic tele-auscultation system.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (Initially Named "Shanghai First People's Hospital"), 100 Haining Road, Shanghai, 200080, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nursing, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (Initially Named "Shanghai First People's Hospital"), Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Biomed Eng Online. 2022 Sep 6;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12938-022-01032-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the spread of COVID-19, telemedicine has played an important role, but tele-auscultation is still unavailable in most countries. This study introduces and tests a tele-auscultation system (Stemoscope) and compares the concordance of the Stemoscope with the traditional stethoscope in the evaluation of heart murmurs.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients with murmurs were recruited, and echocardiographs were performed. Three cardiologists were asked to correctly categorize heart sounds (both systolic murmur and diastolic murmur) as normal vs. abnormal with both the Stemoscope and a traditional acoustic stethoscope under different conditions. Firstly, we compared the in-person auscultation agreement between Stemoscope and the conventional acoustic stethoscope. Secondly, we compared tele-auscultation (recorded heart sounds) agreement between Stemoscope and acoustic results. Thirdly, we compared both the Stemoscope tele-auscultation results and traditional acoustic stethoscope in-person auscultation results with echocardiography. Finally, ten other cardiologists were asked to complete a qualitative questionnaire to assess their experience using the Stemoscope.

RESULTS

For murmurs detection, the in-person auscultation agreement between Stemoscope and the acoustic stethoscope was 91% (p = 0.67). The agreement between Stemoscope tele-auscultation and the acoustic stethoscope in-person auscultation was 90% (p = 0.32). When using the echocardiographic findings as the reference, the agreement between Stemoscope (tele-auscultation) and the acoustic stethoscope (in-person auscultation) was 89% vs. 86% (p = 1.00). The system evaluated by ten cardiologists is considered easy to use, and most of them would consider using it in a telemedical setting.

CONCLUSION

In-person auscultation and tele-auscultation by the Stemoscope are in good agreement with manual acoustic auscultation. The Stemoscope is a helpful heart murmur screening tool at a distance and can be used in telemedicine.

摘要

背景

随着 COVID-19 的传播,远程医疗发挥了重要作用,但大多数国家仍无法进行远程听诊。本研究介绍并测试了一种远程听诊系统(Stemoscope),并比较了 Stemoscope 在评估心杂音方面与传统听诊器的一致性。

方法

共招募了 57 例有杂音的患者,并进行了超声心动图检查。三名心脏病专家在不同条件下,使用 Stemoscope 和传统声学听诊器,正确分类心音(收缩期杂音和舒张期杂音)为正常或异常。首先,我们比较了 Stemoscope 与传统声学听诊器的现场听诊一致性。其次,我们比较了 Stemoscope 远程听诊(记录的心音)与声学结果的一致性。第三,我们比较了 Stemoscope 远程听诊结果和传统声学听诊器现场听诊结果与超声心动图的一致性。最后,另外 10 名心脏病专家完成了一份定性问卷,以评估他们使用 Stemoscope 的经验。

结果

对于杂音检测,Stemoscope 与声学听诊器的现场听诊一致性为 91%(p=0.67)。Stemoscope 远程听诊与声学听诊器现场听诊的一致性为 90%(p=0.32)。当以超声心动图结果为参考时,Stemoscope(远程听诊)与声学听诊器(现场听诊)的一致性为 89%与 86%(p=1.00)。十位心脏病专家评估的系统被认为易于使用,他们大多数人会考虑在远程医疗环境中使用它。

结论

现场听诊和 Stemoscope 远程听诊与手动声学听诊具有良好的一致性。Stemoscope 是一种有助于远程进行心杂音筛查的工具,可用于远程医疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d58d/9450463/e6bfcf24358f/12938_2022_1032_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验